Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915/dp: Check if guardband can accommodate sdp latencies
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2025 15:02:57 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aPIwcasPJ9PCU4yq@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251017050202.2211985-4-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>

On Fri, Oct 17, 2025 at 10:32:00AM +0530, Ankit Nautiyal wrote:
> Check if guardband is sufficient for all DP SDP latencies.
> If its not, fail .compute_config_late().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> index 3f2c319e3d6f..8ae99cee79d4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> @@ -93,6 +93,7 @@
>  #include "intel_psr.h"
>  #include "intel_quirks.h"
>  #include "intel_tc.h"
> +#include "intel_vblank.h"
>  #include "intel_vdsc.h"
>  #include "intel_vrr.h"
>  
> @@ -6980,14 +6981,35 @@ void intel_dp_mst_resume(struct intel_display *display)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> +static
> +int intel_dp_sdp_compute_config_late(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> +{
> +	struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(crtc_state);
> +	int guardband = intel_crtc_vblank_length(crtc_state);

In theory we might have enough legacy TG vblank but not VRR guardband
(I suppose that can only happen on ICL/TGL due to the pipeline full
limit) so I was pondering whether we might need to check both. But I
think this is fine. We would just fail when trying to enable VRR in
those cases, but without VRR enabled we can still light up th display.

Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

> +	int min_sdp_guardband = intel_dp_sdp_min_guardband(crtc_state, false);
> +
> +	if (guardband < min_sdp_guardband) {
> +		drm_dbg_kms(display->drm, "guardband %d < min sdp guardband %d\n",
> +			    guardband, min_sdp_guardband);
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  int intel_dp_compute_config_late(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>  				 struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>  				 struct drm_connector_state *conn_state)
>  {
>  	struct intel_dp *intel_dp = enc_to_intel_dp(encoder);
> +	int ret;
>  
>  	intel_psr_compute_config_late(intel_dp, crtc_state);
>  
> +	ret = intel_dp_sdp_compute_config_late(crtc_state);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.45.2

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel

  reply	other threads:[~2025-10-17 12:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-17  5:01 [PATCH 0/5] Optimize vrr.guardband Ankit Nautiyal
2025-10-17  5:01 ` [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915/psr: Add helper to get min psr guardband Ankit Nautiyal
2025-10-17  9:07   ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-10-17  9:30     ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-10-17  9:41       ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-10-17  9:37     ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-10-17  9:58       ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-10-17 10:15         ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-10-17 10:30           ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-10-17 11:11           ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-10-17 11:30             ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-10-17  5:01 ` [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915/dp: Add helper to get min sdp guardband Ankit Nautiyal
2025-10-17 10:50   ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-10-17 11:07     ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-10-17  5:02 ` [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915/dp: Check if guardband can accommodate sdp latencies Ankit Nautiyal
2025-10-17 12:02   ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2025-10-17  5:02 ` [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915/vrr: Use the min static optimized guardband Ankit Nautiyal
2025-10-17 12:06   ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-10-17  5:02 ` [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915/vrr: Use optimized guardband whenever VRR TG is active Ankit Nautiyal
2025-10-17 12:13   ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-10-17  5:23 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for Optimize vrr.guardband (rev3) Patchwork
2025-10-17  5:38 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2025-10-17  6:14 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2025-10-18  4:53 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-10-17 12:34 [PATCH 0/5] Optimize vrr.guardband Ankit Nautiyal
2025-10-17 12:35 ` [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915/dp: Check if guardband can accommodate sdp latencies Ankit Nautiyal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aPIwcasPJ9PCU4yq@intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox