From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: "Lin, Shuicheng" <shuicheng.lin@intel.com>
Cc: "Auld, Matthew" <matthew.auld@intel.com>,
"intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/xe: Fix stolen size check to allow equal WOPCM size
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2025 13:11:07 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aPe-q-JaxJAToN9q@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BL1PR11MB5447E7EA697902D7F6925F35EAF2A@BL1PR11MB5447.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 12:09:44PM -0400, Lin, Shuicheng wrote:
> Thanks Matthew for the review.
>
> Hi xe maintainers,
> Could you please help me review and merge it?
> Thanks in advance for your support.
Double sorry here, for the delay and for missing this case where
the stolen is solely the wocpm.
pushed to drm-xe-next now.
Thanks,
Rodrigo.
>
> Best Regards
> Shuicheng
>
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2025 1:55 AM Matthew Auld wrote:
> > On 16/10/2025 23:55, Shuicheng Lin wrote:
> > > On some platforms without dedicated stolen memory, the calculated
> > > stolen size may be exactly equal to the WOPCM size. The current
> > > assertion incorrectly requires it to be strictly greater, causing a
> > > false failure. Relax the check to allow equality.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 65369b8e2961 ("drm/xe: Change return type of detect_bar2_dgfx()
> > > from s64 to u64")
> > > Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/-/issues/6359
> > > Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
> > > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Shuicheng Lin <shuicheng.lin@intel.com>
> >
> > Looking at the logs for PVC it has previously never been probed with an actual
> > usable stolen area it seems, so this looks correct to me.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
> >
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ttm_stolen_mgr.c | 2 +-
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ttm_stolen_mgr.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ttm_stolen_mgr.c
> > > index e368b2a36bac..1bddecfb723a 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ttm_stolen_mgr.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ttm_stolen_mgr.c
> > > @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ static u64 detect_bar2_dgfx(struct xe_device *xe,
> > > struct xe_ttm_stolen_mgr *mgr)
> > >
> > > stolen_size = tile_size - mgr->stolen_base;
> > >
> > > - xe_assert(xe, stolen_size > wopcm_size);
> > > + xe_assert(xe, stolen_size >= wopcm_size);
> > > stolen_size -= wopcm_size;
> > >
> > > /* Verify usage fits in the actual resource available */
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-21 17:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-16 22:55 [PATCH] drm/xe: Fix stolen size check to allow equal WOPCM size Shuicheng Lin
2025-10-16 23:04 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for " Patchwork
2025-10-16 23:42 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-10-17 8:54 ` [PATCH] " Matthew Auld
2025-10-21 16:09 ` Lin, Shuicheng
2025-10-21 17:11 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2025-10-17 20:53 ` ✓ Xe.CI.Full: success for " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aPe-q-JaxJAToN9q@intel.com \
--to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
--cc=shuicheng.lin@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox