From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D68ECCD1BE for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2025 06:31:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EF7510E6B3; Wed, 22 Oct 2025 06:31:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: gabe.freedesktop.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="V8la5H9M"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.17]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5220D10E6B3 for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2025 06:31:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1761114703; x=1792650703; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=/Vq4DYq59sABXa2nMwLkrUSWFKe9K2bA/NiDbAR9eSA=; b=V8la5H9M4xgB8z4qZOg9OrJEpBB9fSKUBD9wIi71CtB5S6bxwB8JLN4k AuYBGo26KpkfFFeZWz7Ag1hwladEOnoPwFqLNPPvMPwG+44jI7bJduAhN jsohyN/5t2y0mpips6h7dw9ce/zDPxUj6DsAyZgzdYD7Nmt+ZToQCbmi0 qVoj+qPVVF3m5O4VeuL94MMZGMpTlfGx/OwJVqK4PGSZExZKdtEyyNktL sLGgCgUf3WAxO61RAb7Z/8sPCzMw94YV1KqiEMxMZvS5cD51n8H3c5WIE X7yzOdc9tix3mdfNFSj8put42qcgKotB5oIlAjXWk3dnYfbHhPmeaKkjc Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: Re4/oQv+QUGqzUOImslZOA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: bJkqL1/7RqKmCwfBPu5lhA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11586"; a="63162375" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.19,246,1754982000"; d="scan'208";a="63162375" Received: from fmviesa005.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.145]) by fmvoesa111.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Oct 2025 23:31:43 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: Eg2K3LEkSIWCp2eBbnxz/w== X-CSE-MsgGUID: eHD3uXYXQs2Qz6RE2PywQg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.19,246,1754982000"; d="scan'208";a="188199639" Received: from black.igk.intel.com ([10.91.253.5]) by fmviesa005.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Oct 2025 23:31:41 -0700 Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2025 08:31:39 +0200 From: Raag Jadav To: Sk Anirban , lucas.demarchi@intel.com Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/12] drm/xe/cri: Add new performance limit reasons bits Message-ID: References: <20251021-cri-v1-4-bf11e61d9f49@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20251021-cri-v1-4-bf11e61d9f49@intel.com> X-BeenThere: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel Xe graphics driver List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: intel-xe-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-xe" On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 10:17:36PM -0700, Sk Anirban wrote: > Add support for additional performance limit reasons in > GT0_PERF_LIMIT_REASONS register. > > Signed-off-by: Sk Anirban > --- > There are some improvements to be made here before applying to reduce > the amount of code for one platform. I plan to take a look on that for > v2. Yes, I had planned this but there were some concerns related to backporting (in case there arises such a requirement). I'll leave the final call to you. Raag > Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi > ---