From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Sk Anirban <sk.anirban@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>, <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>,
<badal.nilawar@intel.com>, <riana.tauro@intel.com>,
<karthik.poosa@intel.com>, <raag.jadav@intel.com>,
<soham.purkait@intel.com>, <mallesh.koujalagi@intel.com>,
<vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] drm/xe/guc: Eliminate RPa frequency caching
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2025 22:21:59 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aQ63V87uylxo77ie@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251104195735.1606126-6-sk.anirban@intel.com>
On Wed, Nov 05, 2025 at 01:27:38AM +0530, Sk Anirban wrote:
> Remove the cached pc->rpa_freq field and refactor RPA frequency handling
> to fetch values directly from hardware registers on each request.
>
> v2: Check graphics version instead of platform (Rodrigo)
> v3: Fix graphics version check (Badal)
>
> Suggested-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> Suggested-by: Badal Nilawar <badal.nilawar@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sk Anirban <sk.anirban@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c | 55 +++++++++++++---------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc_types.h | 2 -
> 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c
> index efa9318c4587..ea9925cdc107 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c
> @@ -363,7 +363,7 @@ static int pc_set_max_freq(struct xe_guc_pc *pc, u32 freq)
> freq);
> }
>
> -static void mtl_update_rpa_value(struct xe_guc_pc *pc)
> +static u32 mtl_get_rpa_freq(struct xe_guc_pc *pc)
> {
> struct xe_gt *gt = pc_to_gt(pc);
> u32 reg;
> @@ -373,7 +373,7 @@ static void mtl_update_rpa_value(struct xe_guc_pc *pc)
> else
> reg = xe_mmio_read32(>->mmio, MTL_GT_RPA_FREQUENCY);
>
> - pc->rpa_freq = decode_freq(REG_FIELD_GET(MTL_RPA_MASK, reg));
> + return decode_freq(REG_FIELD_GET(MTL_RPA_MASK, reg));
> }
>
> static u32 mtl_get_rpe_freq(struct xe_guc_pc *pc)
> @@ -389,24 +389,28 @@ static u32 mtl_get_rpe_freq(struct xe_guc_pc *pc)
> return decode_freq(REG_FIELD_GET(MTL_RPE_MASK, reg));
> }
>
> -static void tgl_update_rpa_value(struct xe_guc_pc *pc)
> +static u32 pvc_get_rpa_freq(struct xe_guc_pc *pc)
> {
> - struct xe_gt *gt = pc_to_gt(pc);
> - struct xe_device *xe = gt_to_xe(gt);
> - u32 reg;
> -
> /*
> * For PVC we still need to use fused RP0 as the approximation for RPa
> * For other platforms than PVC we get the resolved RPa directly from
> * PCODE at a different register
> */
> - if (xe->info.platform == XE_PVC) {
> - reg = xe_mmio_read32(>->mmio, PVC_RP_STATE_CAP);
> - pc->rpa_freq = REG_FIELD_GET(RP0_MASK, reg) * GT_FREQUENCY_MULTIPLIER;
> - } else {
> - reg = xe_mmio_read32(>->mmio, FREQ_INFO_REC);
> - pc->rpa_freq = REG_FIELD_GET(RPA_MASK, reg) * GT_FREQUENCY_MULTIPLIER;
> - }
> +
> + struct xe_gt *gt = pc_to_gt(pc);
> + u32 reg;
> +
> + reg = xe_mmio_read32(>->mmio, PVC_RP_STATE_CAP);
> + return REG_FIELD_GET(RP0_MASK, reg) * GT_FREQUENCY_MULTIPLIER;
> +}
> +
> +static u32 tgl_get_rpa_freq(struct xe_guc_pc *pc)
> +{
> + struct xe_gt *gt = pc_to_gt(pc);
> + u32 reg;
> +
> + reg = xe_mmio_read32(>->mmio, FREQ_INFO_REC);
> + return REG_FIELD_GET(RPA_MASK, reg) * GT_FREQUENCY_MULTIPLIER;
> }
>
> static u32 pvc_get_rpe_freq(struct xe_guc_pc *pc)
> @@ -427,17 +431,6 @@ static u32 tgl_get_rpe_freq(struct xe_guc_pc *pc)
> return REG_FIELD_GET(RPE_MASK, reg) * GT_FREQUENCY_MULTIPLIER;
> }
>
> -static void pc_update_rp_values(struct xe_guc_pc *pc)
> -{
> - struct xe_gt *gt = pc_to_gt(pc);
> - struct xe_device *xe = gt_to_xe(gt);
> -
> - if (GRAPHICS_VERx100(xe) >= 1270)
> - mtl_update_rpa_value(pc);
> - else
> - tgl_update_rpa_value(pc);
> -}
> -
> /**
> * xe_guc_pc_get_act_freq - Get Actual running frequency
> * @pc: The GuC PC
> @@ -536,9 +529,15 @@ u32 xe_guc_pc_get_rp0_freq(struct xe_guc_pc *pc)
> */
> u32 xe_guc_pc_get_rpa_freq(struct xe_guc_pc *pc)
> {
> - pc_update_rp_values(pc);
> + struct xe_gt *gt = pc_to_gt(pc);
> + struct xe_device *xe = gt_to_xe(gt);
>
> - return pc->rpa_freq;
> + if (GRAPHICS_VERx100(xe) == 1260)
> + return pvc_get_rpa_freq(pc);
> + else if (GRAPHICS_VERx100(xe) >= 1270)
> + return mtl_get_rpa_freq(pc);
> + else
> + return tgl_get_rpa_freq(pc);
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -1135,8 +1134,6 @@ static int pc_init_freqs(struct xe_guc_pc *pc)
> if (ret)
> goto out;
>
> - pc_update_rp_values(pc);
> -
> pc_init_pcode_freq(pc);
>
> /*
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc_types.h
> index f27c05d81706..711bbcdcb0d3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc_types.h
> @@ -19,8 +19,6 @@ struct xe_guc_pc {
> atomic_t flush_freq_limit;
> /** @rp0_freq: HW RP0 frequency - The Maximum one */
> u32 rp0_freq;
> - /** @rpa_freq: HW RPa frequency - The Achievable one */
> - u32 rpa_freq;
> /** @rpn_freq: HW RPN frequency - The Minimum one */
> u32 rpn_freq;
> /** @user_requested_min: Stash the minimum requested freq by user */
> --
> 2.43.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-08 3:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-04 19:57 [PATCH v6 0/2] drm/xe/guc: Remove cached frequency values for GuC SLPC Sk Anirban
2025-11-04 19:57 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] drm/xe/guc: Eliminate RPe caching for SLPC parameter handling Sk Anirban
2025-11-07 1:51 ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2025-11-08 3:23 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-11-10 9:46 ` Anirban, Sk
2025-11-04 19:57 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] drm/xe/guc: Eliminate RPa frequency caching Sk Anirban
2025-11-08 3:21 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2025-11-05 2:51 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe/guc: Remove cached frequency values for GuC SLPC (rev3) Patchwork
2025-11-05 3:54 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-11-05 9:46 ` ✓ Xe.CI.Full: " Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-11-12 18:51 [PATCH v6 0/2] drm/xe/guc: Remove cached frequency values for GuC SLPC Sk Anirban
2025-11-12 18:51 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] drm/xe/guc: Eliminate RPa frequency caching Sk Anirban
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aQ63V87uylxo77ie@intel.com \
--to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=anshuman.gupta@intel.com \
--cc=badal.nilawar@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=karthik.poosa@intel.com \
--cc=mallesh.koujalagi@intel.com \
--cc=raag.jadav@intel.com \
--cc=riana.tauro@intel.com \
--cc=sk.anirban@intel.com \
--cc=soham.purkait@intel.com \
--cc=vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox