From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BCA2CF259F for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2025 15:00:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C329810E654; Wed, 19 Nov 2025 15:00:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: gabe.freedesktop.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="PwqIxE92"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.7]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC5A210E64F; Wed, 19 Nov 2025 15:00:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1763564451; x=1795100451; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=6VLOKmDo4WviGUhM4qQZA7IzCWHn1ZvDUbxiE4MHVTw=; b=PwqIxE92BHunt/rCEM+35DFrV5Js1lkLdEcSgqSbWQ2mwnb8LXlyrYu1 Xsw2Yi6CgDptdwZG9jKX596BkpTmpBBJylkwjDdCMsjF8y92SYeTBni0V L02L8Y5UT+gqi2D6XKxUF+eH3Ca0rGuH+TXvrmEtyFgk1hqkzRhpZtlgt KXVTlFFSDt7Etbq4dc1NmLWNgP6Yd31CJWBmFf8zADODprEjFIREKzK/F mwLdwOfYrLZiXQiQgoGSNy46zTrBn6ee95a6vYbN4PBI9GmAZvBwfO9Mo INWT85WJNnnK7Dl1iO7JjwEWPzSfVUOVeeObxFD6CQWD/NRl1llDAwUuw g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: KtOsV4EgRGWFZCoXNOli9A== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 49qp4tYFQzaG4LRpcg5LIw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11618"; a="91085420" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.19,315,1754982000"; d="scan'208";a="91085420" Received: from fmviesa008.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.148]) by fmvoesa101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Nov 2025 06:59:36 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 1p6r6x9uS5u32zRd1eVaZg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: voIFHWIqQSaE97KThetVqA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.19,315,1754982000"; d="scan'208";a="191329073" Received: from rvuia-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.245.245]) by fmviesa008-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Nov 2025 06:59:30 -0800 Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2025 16:59:28 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Petr Mladek Cc: Steven Rostedt , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rasmus Villemoes , Sergey Senozhatsky , Jonathan Corbet Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/21] treewide: Introduce %ptS for struct timespec64 and convert users Message-ID: References: <20251113150217.3030010-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo X-BeenThere: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel Xe graphics driver List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: intel-xe-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-xe" On Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 02:11:12PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote: > On Thu 2025-11-13 15:32:14, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > Here is the third part of the unification time printing in the kernel. > > This time for struct timespec64. The first patch brings a support > > into printf() implementation (test cases and documentation update > > included) followed by the treewide conversion of the current users. > > > > Petr, we got like more than a half being Acked, I think if you are okay > > with this, the patches that have been tagged can be applied. > > > > Note, not everything was compile-tested. Kunit test has been passed, though. > > JFYI, the patchset has been committed into printk/linux.git, > branch for-6.19-vsprintf-timespec64. > > Note, that I have: > > + fixed the 19th patch as proposed, see > https://lore.kernel.org/all/aR2XAYWTEgMZu_Mx@pathway.suse.cz/ > > + reviewed all patches but I triple checked 7th patch which > did not have any ack yet. And I added my Reviewed-by tag > there. ;-) > > + I tried build with allyesconfig. It succeeded. I am not 100% > sure that it built all modified sources but... Thank you! -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko