From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Walk crtcs in pipe order
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2025 20:42:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aR9hCIHDIJKtt_Su@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <add11487eaa3a418d199d8f9b851e4dfbad0cf25@intel.com>
On Thu, Nov 20, 2025 at 07:47:54PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Nov 2025, Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> >
> > Currently our crtcs are registered in pipe order, and thus
> > all the for_intel_crtc*() iterators walk the crtcs in pipe
> > order. There are a bunch of places that more or less depend
> > on that. Eg. during plane updates and such we want joined
> > pipes to be processed back-to-back to give a better chance
> > of an atomic update across the whole set.
> >
> > When we start to register crtcs in a different order we don't
> > want to change the order in which the pipes get handled.
> > Decouple the for_each_intel_crtc*() iterators from the crtc
> > registration order by using a separate list which will be
> > sorted by the pipe rather than the crtc index.
> >
> > We could priobably use a simple array or something, but that
> > would require some kind of extra iterator variable for the
> > macros, and thus would require a lot more changes. Using
> > a linked list keeps the fallout minimal. We can look at
> > using a more optimal data structure later.
>
> I think the list works fine.
I supose. Though we do walk these a lot, and we might be
hitting a few more cachelines now, but hopefully they
remain clean so there's no ping-pong between CPUs...
>
> > I also added this extra junk to the atomic state iterators:
> > "(__i) = drm_crtc_index(&(crtc)->base), (void)(__i)"
> > even though the macro itself no longer needs the "__i" iterator.
> > This in case the "__i" is used by the caller, and to
> > avoid compiler warnings if it's completely unused now.
>
> At a glance, I can't find any. Perhaps you could cook up some cocci to
> remove the parameter as follow-up?
IIRC I already took some kind of stab at hiding the __i inside
the macros (using the UNIQUE_ID stuff) but never posted it.
But I guess we can avoid that now. Might have to think about
doing the same to the drm core macros as well.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_crtc.c | 20 +++++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h | 90 ++++++++-----------
> > .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_core.h | 3 +
> > .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_driver.c | 1 +
> > .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h | 1 +
> > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c | 1 +
> > 6 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_crtc.c
> > index 153ff4b4b52c..7ebbde716238 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_crtc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_crtc.c
> > @@ -209,6 +209,8 @@ static struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc_alloc(void)
> > crtc->base.state = &crtc_state->uapi;
> > crtc->config = crtc_state;
> >
> > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&crtc->pipe_head);
> > +
> > return crtc;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -222,6 +224,8 @@ static void intel_crtc_destroy(struct drm_crtc *_crtc)
> > {
> > struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(_crtc);
> >
> > + list_del(&crtc->pipe_head);
> > +
> > cpu_latency_qos_remove_request(&crtc->vblank_pm_qos);
> >
> > drm_crtc_cleanup(&crtc->base);
> > @@ -308,6 +312,20 @@ static const struct drm_crtc_funcs i8xx_crtc_funcs = {
> > .get_vblank_timestamp = intel_crtc_get_vblank_timestamp,
> > };
> >
> > +static void add_crtc_to_pipe_list(struct intel_display *display, struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> > +{
> > + struct intel_crtc *iter;
> > +
> > + list_for_each_entry(iter, &display->pipe_list, pipe_head) {
> > + if (iter->pipe > crtc->pipe) {
>
> Nitpick, somehow I found it easier to think of this in reverse order,
> "crtc->pipe < iter->pipe", but could be just me. *shrug*.
Yeah, I suppose that might be better. Would at least match the order
of arguments to list_add_tail(), which does match the order they
end up on the list.
>
> > + list_add_tail(&crtc->pipe_head, &iter->pipe_head);
> > + return;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + list_add_tail(&crtc->pipe_head, &display->pipe_list);
> > +}
> > +
> > int intel_crtc_init(struct intel_display *display, enum pipe pipe)
> > {
> > struct intel_plane *primary, *cursor;
> > @@ -398,6 +416,8 @@ int intel_crtc_init(struct intel_display *display, enum pipe pipe)
> > if (HAS_CASF(display))
> > drm_crtc_create_sharpness_strength_property(&crtc->base);
> >
> > + add_crtc_to_pipe_list(display, crtc);
> > +
> > return 0;
> >
> > fail:
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
> > index bcc6ccb69d2b..ac83d4f09bb9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
> > @@ -238,22 +238,23 @@ enum phy_fia {
> > base.head) \
> > for_each_if((intel_plane)->pipe == (intel_crtc)->pipe)
> >
> > -#define for_each_intel_crtc(dev, intel_crtc) \
> > - list_for_each_entry(intel_crtc, \
> > - &(dev)->mode_config.crtc_list, \
> > - base.head)
> > +#define for_each_intel_crtc(dev, crtc) \
> > + list_for_each_entry((crtc), \
> > + &to_intel_display(dev)->pipe_list, \
> > + pipe_head)
> >
> > -#define for_each_intel_crtc_in_pipe_mask(dev, intel_crtc, pipe_mask) \
> > - list_for_each_entry(intel_crtc, \
> > - &(dev)->mode_config.crtc_list, \
> > - base.head) \
> > - for_each_if((pipe_mask) & BIT(intel_crtc->pipe))
> > +#define for_each_intel_crtc_reverse(dev, crtc) \
> > + list_for_each_entry_reverse((crtc), \
> > + &to_intel_display(dev)->pipe_list, \
> > + pipe_head)
> >
> > -#define for_each_intel_crtc_in_pipe_mask_reverse(dev, intel_crtc, pipe_mask) \
> > - list_for_each_entry_reverse((intel_crtc), \
> > - &(dev)->mode_config.crtc_list, \
> > - base.head) \
> > - for_each_if((pipe_mask) & BIT((intel_crtc)->pipe))
> > +#define for_each_intel_crtc_in_pipe_mask(dev, crtc, pipe_mask) \
> > + for_each_intel_crtc((dev), (crtc)) \
> > + for_each_if((pipe_mask) & BIT((crtc)->pipe))
> > +
> > +#define for_each_intel_crtc_in_pipe_mask_reverse(dev, crtc, pipe_mask) \
> > + for_each_intel_crtc_reverse((dev), (crtc)) \
> > + for_each_if((pipe_mask) & BIT((crtc)->pipe))
> >
> > #define for_each_intel_encoder(dev, intel_encoder) \
> > list_for_each_entry(intel_encoder, \
> > @@ -295,14 +296,6 @@ enum phy_fia {
> > (__i)++) \
> > for_each_if(plane)
> >
> > -#define for_each_old_intel_crtc_in_state(__state, crtc, old_crtc_state, __i) \
> > - for ((__i) = 0; \
> > - (__i) < (__state)->base.dev->mode_config.num_crtc && \
> > - ((crtc) = to_intel_crtc((__state)->base.crtcs[__i].ptr), \
> > - (old_crtc_state) = to_intel_crtc_state((__state)->base.crtcs[__i].old_state), 1); \
> > - (__i)++) \
> > - for_each_if(crtc)
> > -
> > #define for_each_new_intel_plane_in_state(__state, plane, new_plane_state, __i) \
> > for ((__i) = 0; \
> > (__i) < (__state)->base.dev->mode_config.num_total_plane && \
> > @@ -311,22 +304,6 @@ enum phy_fia {
> > (__i)++) \
> > for_each_if(plane)
> >
> > -#define for_each_new_intel_crtc_in_state(__state, crtc, new_crtc_state, __i) \
> > - for ((__i) = 0; \
> > - (__i) < (__state)->base.dev->mode_config.num_crtc && \
> > - ((crtc) = to_intel_crtc((__state)->base.crtcs[__i].ptr), \
> > - (new_crtc_state) = to_intel_crtc_state((__state)->base.crtcs[__i].new_state), 1); \
> > - (__i)++) \
> > - for_each_if(crtc)
> > -
> > -#define for_each_new_intel_crtc_in_state_reverse(__state, crtc, new_crtc_state, __i) \
> > - for ((__i) = (__state)->base.dev->mode_config.num_crtc - 1; \
> > - (__i) >= 0 && \
> > - ((crtc) = to_intel_crtc((__state)->base.crtcs[__i].ptr), \
> > - (new_crtc_state) = to_intel_crtc_state((__state)->base.crtcs[__i].new_state), 1); \
> > - (__i)--) \
> > - for_each_if(crtc)
> > -
> > #define for_each_oldnew_intel_plane_in_state(__state, plane, old_plane_state, new_plane_state, __i) \
> > for ((__i) = 0; \
> > (__i) < (__state)->base.dev->mode_config.num_total_plane && \
> > @@ -336,23 +313,32 @@ enum phy_fia {
> > (__i)++) \
> > for_each_if(plane)
> >
> > +#define for_each_old_intel_crtc_in_state(__state, crtc, old_crtc_state, __i) \
> > + for_each_intel_crtc((__state)->base.dev, (crtc)) \
> > + for_each_if(((__i) = drm_crtc_index(&(crtc)->base), (void)(__i), \
> > + (old_crtc_state) = intel_atomic_get_old_crtc_state((__state), (crtc))))
> > +
> > +#define for_each_new_intel_crtc_in_state(__state, crtc, new_crtc_state, __i) \
> > + for_each_intel_crtc((__state)->base.dev, (crtc)) \
> > + for_each_if(((__i) = drm_crtc_index(&(crtc)->base), (void)(__i), \
> > + (new_crtc_state) = intel_atomic_get_new_crtc_state((__state), (crtc))))
> > +
> > +#define for_each_new_intel_crtc_in_state_reverse(__state, crtc, new_crtc_state, __i) \
> > + for_each_intel_crtc_reverse((__state)->base.dev, (crtc)) \
> > + for_each_if(((__i) = drm_crtc_index(&(crtc)->base), (void)(__i), \
> > + (new_crtc_state) = intel_atomic_get_new_crtc_state((__state), (crtc))))
> > +
> > #define for_each_oldnew_intel_crtc_in_state(__state, crtc, old_crtc_state, new_crtc_state, __i) \
> > - for ((__i) = 0; \
> > - (__i) < (__state)->base.dev->mode_config.num_crtc && \
> > - ((crtc) = to_intel_crtc((__state)->base.crtcs[__i].ptr), \
> > - (old_crtc_state) = to_intel_crtc_state((__state)->base.crtcs[__i].old_state), \
> > - (new_crtc_state) = to_intel_crtc_state((__state)->base.crtcs[__i].new_state), 1); \
> > - (__i)++) \
> > - for_each_if(crtc)
> > + for_each_intel_crtc((__state)->base.dev, (crtc)) \
> > + for_each_if(((__i) = drm_crtc_index(&(crtc)->base), (void)(__i), \
> > + (old_crtc_state) = intel_atomic_get_old_crtc_state((__state), (crtc)), \
> > + (new_crtc_state) = intel_atomic_get_new_crtc_state((__state), (crtc))))
> >
> > #define for_each_oldnew_intel_crtc_in_state_reverse(__state, crtc, old_crtc_state, new_crtc_state, __i) \
> > - for ((__i) = (__state)->base.dev->mode_config.num_crtc - 1; \
> > - (__i) >= 0 && \
> > - ((crtc) = to_intel_crtc((__state)->base.crtcs[__i].ptr), \
> > - (old_crtc_state) = to_intel_crtc_state((__state)->base.crtcs[__i].old_state), \
> > - (new_crtc_state) = to_intel_crtc_state((__state)->base.crtcs[__i].new_state), 1); \
> > - (__i)--) \
> > - for_each_if(crtc)
> > + for_each_intel_crtc_reverse((__state)->base.dev, (crtc)) \
> > + for_each_if(((__i) = drm_crtc_index(&(crtc)->base), (void)(__i), \
> > + (old_crtc_state) = intel_atomic_get_old_crtc_state((__state), (crtc)), \
> > + (new_crtc_state) = intel_atomic_get_new_crtc_state((__state), (crtc))))
>
> These were a PITA to go through, but I think it's fine. Knocks wood.
>
> Thanks for doing this.
>
> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>
> >
> > #define intel_atomic_crtc_state_for_each_plane_state( \
> > plane, plane_state, \
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_core.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_core.h
> > index 9b8414b77c15..4f4d5c314394 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_core.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_core.h
> > @@ -294,6 +294,9 @@ struct intel_display {
> > /* Parent, or core, driver functions exposed to display */
> > const struct intel_display_parent_interface *parent;
> >
> > + /* list of all intel_crtcs sorted by pipe */
> > + struct list_head pipe_list;
> > +
> > /* Display functions */
> > struct {
> > /* Top level crtc-ish functions */
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_driver.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_driver.c
> > index 7e000ba3e08b..32726906e550 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_driver.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_driver.c
> > @@ -119,6 +119,7 @@ static void intel_mode_config_init(struct intel_display *display)
> >
> > drm_mode_config_init(display->drm);
> > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&display->global.obj_list);
> > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&display->pipe_list);
> >
> > mode_config->min_width = 0;
> > mode_config->min_height = 0;
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> > index 38702a9e0f50..1c2bd9445795 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> > @@ -1441,6 +1441,7 @@ struct intel_flipq {
> >
> > struct intel_crtc {
> > struct drm_crtc base;
> > + struct list_head pipe_head;
> > enum pipe pipe;
> > /*
> > * Whether the crtc and the connected output pipeline is active. Implies
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
> > index e3320d9e6314..cfcbc7dd8638 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
> > @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
> > #include "intel_audio.h"
> > #include "intel_bw.h"
> > #include "intel_display.h"
> > +#include "intel_display_core.h"
> > #include "intel_display_device.h"
> > #include "intel_display_driver.h"
> > #include "intel_display_irq.h"
>
> --
> Jani Nikula, Intel
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-20 18:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-20 14:49 [PATCH] drm/i915: Walk crtcs in pipe order Ville Syrjala
2025-11-20 16:45 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for " Patchwork
2025-11-20 16:46 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-11-20 17:43 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-11-20 17:47 ` [PATCH] " Jani Nikula
2025-11-20 18:42 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2025-11-20 19:21 ` [PATCH v2] " Ville Syrjala
2025-11-20 21:50 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure for " Patchwork
2025-11-20 22:49 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/i915: Walk crtcs in pipe order (rev2) Patchwork
2025-11-20 22:50 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-11-20 23:29 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-11-21 4:19 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aR9hCIHDIJKtt_Su@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).