From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] drm/{i915,xe}/display: duplicate gen2 irq/error init/reset in display irq
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2025 17:48:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aRNaz6blAVHCPlgS@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cf235460bbb11bde65cca4e65b7d6904adfe146c.1762846363.git.jani.nikula@intel.com>
On Tue, Nov 11, 2025 at 09:34:02AM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Duplicate gen2_irq_reset(), gen2_assert_iir_is_zero(), gen2_irq_init(),
> gen2_error_reset(), and gen2_error_init() in intel_display_irq.c.
>
> This allows us to drop the duplicates from xe, and prepares for future
> cleanups. Although duplication is undesirable in general, in this case
> the local duplicates lead to a cleaner end result.
>
> There's a slight wrinkle in gen2_assert_iir_is_zero(). We need to use
> non-device based logging until we pass in struct intel_display in a
> separate change.
>
> v2:
> - Keep xe compat stuff due to series reorder and rebase
> - Keep the WARN as regular WARN
> - Rename the functions in the same go
>
> Suggested-by: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> ---
>
> Note: 'git show --color-moved' helps review
> ---
> .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_irq.c | 82 +++++++++++++++++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/ext/i915_irq.c | 67 ---------------
> 2 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_irq.c
> index 43b27deb4a26..acfaff13c3ba 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_irq.c
> @@ -33,6 +33,72 @@
> #include "intel_psr_regs.h"
> #include "intel_uncore.h"
>
> +static void irq_reset(struct intel_uncore *uncore, struct i915_irq_regs regs)
> +{
> + intel_uncore_write(uncore, regs.imr, 0xffffffff);
> + intel_uncore_posting_read(uncore, regs.imr);
> +
> + intel_uncore_write(uncore, regs.ier, 0);
> +
> + /* IIR can theoretically queue up two events. Be paranoid. */
> + intel_uncore_write(uncore, regs.iir, 0xffffffff);
> + intel_uncore_posting_read(uncore, regs.iir);
> + intel_uncore_write(uncore, regs.iir, 0xffffffff);
> + intel_uncore_posting_read(uncore, regs.iir);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * We should clear IMR at preinstall/uninstall, and just check at postinstall.
> + */
> +static void assert_iir_is_zero(struct intel_uncore *uncore, i915_reg_t reg)
> +{
> + u32 val = intel_uncore_read(uncore, reg);
> +
> + if (val == 0)
> + return;
> +
> + WARN(1,
> + "Interrupt register 0x%x is not zero: 0x%08x\n",
> + i915_mmio_reg_offset(reg), val);
> + intel_uncore_write(uncore, reg, 0xffffffff);
> + intel_uncore_posting_read(uncore, reg);
> + intel_uncore_write(uncore, reg, 0xffffffff);
> + intel_uncore_posting_read(uncore, reg);
> +}
> +
> +static void irq_init(struct intel_uncore *uncore, struct i915_irq_regs regs,
> + u32 imr_val, u32 ier_val)
> +{
> + assert_iir_is_zero(uncore, regs.iir);
> +
> + intel_uncore_write(uncore, regs.ier, ier_val);
> + intel_uncore_write(uncore, regs.imr, imr_val);
> + intel_uncore_posting_read(uncore, regs.imr);
> +}
> +
> +static void error_reset(struct intel_uncore *uncore, struct i915_error_regs regs)
> +{
> + intel_uncore_write(uncore, regs.emr, 0xffffffff);
> + intel_uncore_posting_read(uncore, regs.emr);
> +
> + intel_uncore_write(uncore, regs.eir, 0xffffffff);
> + intel_uncore_posting_read(uncore, regs.eir);
> + intel_uncore_write(uncore, regs.eir, 0xffffffff);
> + intel_uncore_posting_read(uncore, regs.eir);
> +}
> +
> +static void error_init(struct intel_uncore *uncore, struct i915_error_regs regs,
> + u32 emr_val)
> +{
> + intel_uncore_write(uncore, regs.eir, 0xffffffff);
> + intel_uncore_posting_read(uncore, regs.eir);
> + intel_uncore_write(uncore, regs.eir, 0xffffffff);
> + intel_uncore_posting_read(uncore, regs.eir);
> +
> + intel_uncore_write(uncore, regs.emr, emr_val);
> + intel_uncore_posting_read(uncore, regs.emr);
> +}
> +
> static void
> intel_display_irq_regs_init(struct intel_display *display, struct i915_irq_regs regs,
> u32 imr_val, u32 ier_val)
> @@ -41,7 +107,7 @@ intel_display_irq_regs_init(struct intel_display *display, struct i915_irq_regs
> intel_dmc_wl_get(display, regs.ier);
> intel_dmc_wl_get(display, regs.iir);
>
> - gen2_irq_init(to_intel_uncore(display->drm), regs, imr_val, ier_val);
> + irq_init(to_intel_uncore(display->drm), regs, imr_val, ier_val);
>
> intel_dmc_wl_put(display, regs.iir);
> intel_dmc_wl_put(display, regs.ier);
> @@ -55,7 +121,7 @@ intel_display_irq_regs_reset(struct intel_display *display, struct i915_irq_regs
> intel_dmc_wl_get(display, regs.ier);
> intel_dmc_wl_get(display, regs.iir);
>
> - gen2_irq_reset(to_intel_uncore(display->drm), regs);
> + irq_reset(to_intel_uncore(display->drm), regs);
>
> intel_dmc_wl_put(display, regs.iir);
> intel_dmc_wl_put(display, regs.ier);
> @@ -67,7 +133,7 @@ intel_display_irq_regs_assert_irr_is_zero(struct intel_display *display, i915_re
> {
> intel_dmc_wl_get(display, reg);
>
> - gen2_assert_iir_is_zero(to_intel_uncore(display->drm), reg);
> + assert_iir_is_zero(to_intel_uncore(display->drm), reg);
>
> intel_dmc_wl_put(display, reg);
> }
> @@ -1918,8 +1984,7 @@ static void _vlv_display_irq_reset(struct intel_display *display)
> else
> intel_de_write(display, DPINVGTT, DPINVGTT_STATUS_MASK_VLV);
>
> - gen2_error_reset(to_intel_uncore(display->drm),
> - VLV_ERROR_REGS);
> + error_reset(to_intel_uncore(display->drm), VLV_ERROR_REGS);
>
> i915_hotplug_interrupt_update_locked(display, 0xffffffff, 0);
> intel_de_rmw(display, PORT_HOTPLUG_STAT(display), 0, 0);
> @@ -2014,8 +2079,7 @@ static void _vlv_display_irq_postinstall(struct intel_display *display)
> DPINVGTT_STATUS_MASK_VLV |
> DPINVGTT_EN_MASK_VLV);
>
> - gen2_error_init(to_intel_uncore(display->drm),
> - VLV_ERROR_REGS, ~vlv_error_mask());
> + error_init(to_intel_uncore(display->drm), VLV_ERROR_REGS, ~vlv_error_mask());
>
> pipestat_mask = PIPE_CRC_DONE_INTERRUPT_STATUS;
>
> @@ -2054,7 +2118,7 @@ static void ibx_display_irq_reset(struct intel_display *display)
> if (HAS_PCH_NOP(display))
> return;
>
> - gen2_irq_reset(to_intel_uncore(display->drm), SDE_IRQ_REGS);
> + irq_reset(to_intel_uncore(display->drm), SDE_IRQ_REGS);
>
> if (HAS_PCH_CPT(display) || HAS_PCH_LPT(display))
> intel_de_write(display, SERR_INT, 0xffffffff);
> @@ -2064,7 +2128,7 @@ void ilk_display_irq_reset(struct intel_display *display)
> {
> struct intel_uncore *uncore = to_intel_uncore(display->drm);
>
> - gen2_irq_reset(uncore, DE_IRQ_REGS);
> + irq_reset(uncore, DE_IRQ_REGS);
> display->irq.ilk_de_imr_mask = ~0u;
>
> if (DISPLAY_VER(display) == 7)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/ext/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/ext/i915_irq.c
> index 3c6bca66ddab..1011c1c754d0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/ext/i915_irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/ext/i915_irq.c
> @@ -7,73 +7,6 @@
> #include "i915_reg.h"
> #include "intel_uncore.h"
>
> -void gen2_irq_reset(struct intel_uncore *uncore, struct i915_irq_regs regs)
> -{
> - intel_uncore_write(uncore, regs.imr, 0xffffffff);
> - intel_uncore_posting_read(uncore, regs.imr);
> -
> - intel_uncore_write(uncore, regs.ier, 0);
> -
> - /* IIR can theoretically queue up two events. Be paranoid. */
> - intel_uncore_write(uncore, regs.iir, 0xffffffff);
> - intel_uncore_posting_read(uncore, regs.iir);
> - intel_uncore_write(uncore, regs.iir, 0xffffffff);
> - intel_uncore_posting_read(uncore, regs.iir);
> -}
> -
> -/*
> - * We should clear IMR at preinstall/uninstall, and just check at postinstall.
> - */
> -void gen2_assert_iir_is_zero(struct intel_uncore *uncore, i915_reg_t reg)
> -{
> - struct xe_device *xe = container_of(uncore, struct xe_device, uncore);
> - u32 val = intel_uncore_read(uncore, reg);
> -
> - if (val == 0)
> - return;
> -
> - drm_WARN(&xe->drm, 1,
> - "Interrupt register 0x%x is not zero: 0x%08x\n",
> - i915_mmio_reg_offset(reg), val);
> - intel_uncore_write(uncore, reg, 0xffffffff);
> - intel_uncore_posting_read(uncore, reg);
> - intel_uncore_write(uncore, reg, 0xffffffff);
> - intel_uncore_posting_read(uncore, reg);
> -}
> -
> -void gen2_irq_init(struct intel_uncore *uncore, struct i915_irq_regs regs,
> - u32 imr_val, u32 ier_val)
> -{
> - gen2_assert_iir_is_zero(uncore, regs.iir);
> -
> - intel_uncore_write(uncore, regs.ier, ier_val);
> - intel_uncore_write(uncore, regs.imr, imr_val);
> - intel_uncore_posting_read(uncore, regs.imr);
> -}
> -
> -void gen2_error_reset(struct intel_uncore *uncore, struct i915_error_regs regs)
> -{
> - intel_uncore_write(uncore, regs.emr, 0xffffffff);
> - intel_uncore_posting_read(uncore, regs.emr);
> -
> - intel_uncore_write(uncore, regs.eir, 0xffffffff);
> - intel_uncore_posting_read(uncore, regs.eir);
> - intel_uncore_write(uncore, regs.eir, 0xffffffff);
> - intel_uncore_posting_read(uncore, regs.eir);
> -}
> -
> -void gen2_error_init(struct intel_uncore *uncore, struct i915_error_regs regs,
> - u32 emr_val)
> -{
> - intel_uncore_write(uncore, regs.eir, 0xffffffff);
> - intel_uncore_posting_read(uncore, regs.eir);
> - intel_uncore_write(uncore, regs.eir, 0xffffffff);
> - intel_uncore_posting_read(uncore, regs.eir);
> -
> - intel_uncore_write(uncore, regs.emr, emr_val);
> - intel_uncore_posting_read(uncore, regs.emr);
> -}
> -
> bool intel_irqs_enabled(struct xe_device *xe)
> {
> return atomic_read(&xe->irq.enabled);
> --
> 2.47.3
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-11 15:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-11 7:34 [PATCH v2 0/3] drm/{i915, xe}/irq: clarify display and parent driver interfaces Jani Nikula
2025-11-11 7:34 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] drm/{i915, xe}/display: duplicate gen2 irq/error init/reset in display irq Jani Nikula
2025-11-11 15:48 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2025-11-11 7:34 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] drm/i915/display: convert the display irq interfaces to struct intel_display Jani Nikula
2025-11-11 15:48 ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-11-11 7:34 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] drm/{i915, xe}/display: move irq calls to parent interface Jani Nikula
2025-11-11 15:50 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] drm/{i915,xe}/display: " Ville Syrjälä
2025-11-12 9:50 ` Jani Nikula
2025-11-12 14:19 ` Jani Nikula
2025-11-12 14:18 ` [PATCH v3] " Jani Nikula
2025-11-11 7:40 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/{i915, xe}/irq: clarify display and parent driver interfaces (rev2) Patchwork
2025-11-11 7:41 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-11-11 8:23 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-11-11 15:25 ` ✓ Xe.CI.Full: " Patchwork
2025-11-12 15:29 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/{i915, xe}/irq: clarify display and parent driver interfaces (rev3) Patchwork
2025-11-12 15:30 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-11-12 16:10 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-11-12 20:26 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aRNaz6blAVHCPlgS@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).