Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	<himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>,
	<thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>, <pallavi.mishra@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 3/9] drm/xe/bo: Prevent purging of shared buffer objects
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 15:10:51 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aS4geyZDuwlcyc9R@lstrano-desk.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251201055309.854074-4-arvind.yadav@intel.com>

On Mon, Dec 01, 2025 at 11:20:13AM +0530, Arvind Yadav wrote:
> Introduce the `xe_bo_is_shared_locked()` inline helper to determine if a
> buffer object is shared across multiple clients or drivers. A buffer is
> considered shared if it is exported via dma-buf, imported, or has a
> handle count greater than one.
> 
> This check is critical for safely implementing purgeable memory. Purging
> a buffer that is shared would lead to data corruption for other clients
> that still hold a reference to it.
> 
> The kernel cannot safely determine when all clients are done with a
> shared buffer, so shared BOs must never be marked DONTNEED or purged.
> 
> The new helper is used in two key locations:
> 1.  In `xe_vm_madvise_purgeable_bo()`, to prevent userspace from
>     successfully marking a shared buffer as `DONTNEED`. This is the
>     primary safeguard against incorrect usage.
> 
> 2.  In `xe_bo_move()`, as a final safety check before the kernel
>     initiates a purge during eviction. This ensures that even if a
>     shared buffer were somehow marked `DONTNEED`, it would not be
>     purged.
> 
> Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.h | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.h
> index b0a31c77e612..97edb38bf1ed 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.h
> @@ -478,4 +478,34 @@ static inline bool xe_bo_is_mem_type(struct xe_bo *bo, u32 mem_type)
>  	xe_bo_assert_held(bo);
>  	return bo->ttm.resource->mem_type == mem_type;
>  }
> +
> +/**
> + * xe_bo_is_shared_locked - Check if a buffer object is shared
> + * @bo: The buffer object to check
> + *
> + * Determines if a buffer object is considered shared, which includes:
> + * - Exported via dma-buf (obj->dma_buf is set)
> + * - Imported from another driver (obj->import_attach is set)
> + * - Referenced by multiple clients (handle_count > 1)
> + *
> + * This check is used to prevent data loss on shared content by avoiding
> + * certain operations like purging on buffers that other processes or
> + * drivers might still be using.
> + *
> + * Return: true if the buffer object is shared, false otherwise.
> + */
> +static inline bool xe_bo_is_shared_locked(const struct xe_bo *bo)
> +{
> +	const struct drm_gem_object *obj = &bo->ttm.base;
> +

It seems like everything below here should be a new drm gem helper.

> +	dma_resv_assert_held(obj->resv);
> +
> +	if (obj->dma_buf || obj->import_attach)
> +		return true;
> +
> +	if (obj->handle_count > 1)

So this covers the case when we prime fd to handle but we resolve to a
BO (i.e., we don't do a dma-buf attach, rather just take reference on BO
as the BO is from the same device)? I just want to make sure I'm
understanding this part correctly. If so, maybe throw a comment in here
or update the functions kernel doc a bit with a better explaination.

Matt 

> +		return true;
> +
> +	return false;
> +}
>  #endif
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2025-12-01 23:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-01  5:50 [RFC v2 0/9] drm/xe/madvise: Add support for purgeable buffer objects Arvind Yadav
2025-12-01  5:50 ` [RFC v2 1/9] drm/xe/uapi: Add UAPI " Arvind Yadav
2025-12-01 23:00   ` Matthew Brost
2025-12-02  2:55     ` Yadav, Arvind
2025-12-01  5:50 ` [RFC v2 2/9] drm/xe/bo: Add purgeable bo state tracking and field madv to xe_bo Arvind Yadav
2025-12-01 23:02   ` Matthew Brost
2025-12-02  2:56     ` Yadav, Arvind
2025-12-02 18:52   ` Matthew Brost
2025-12-01  5:50 ` [RFC v2 3/9] drm/xe/bo: Prevent purging of shared buffer objects Arvind Yadav
2025-12-01 23:10   ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2025-12-02  3:42     ` Yadav, Arvind
2025-12-02  9:42       ` Thomas Hellström
2025-12-02 15:17         ` Matthew Brost
2025-12-02 18:22           ` Yadav, Arvind
2025-12-02 18:35             ` Matthew Brost
2025-12-01  5:50 ` [RFC v2 4/9] drm/xe/madvise: Implement purgeable buffer object support Arvind Yadav
2025-12-02  1:46   ` Matthew Brost
2025-12-02  4:01     ` Yadav, Arvind
2025-12-02 21:39   ` Matthew Brost
2025-12-03 14:01     ` Yadav, Arvind
2025-12-01  5:50 ` [RFC v2 5/9] drm/xe/bo: Handle CPU faults on purged buffer objects Arvind Yadav
2025-12-02 18:42   ` Matthew Brost
2025-12-02 18:48     ` Matthew Brost
2025-12-03  7:25       ` Yadav, Arvind
2025-12-03 16:24         ` Matthew Brost
2025-12-01  5:50 ` [RFC v2 6/9] drm/xe/bo: Prevent mmap of " Arvind Yadav
2025-12-02 18:54   ` Matthew Brost
2025-12-01  5:50 ` [RFC v2 7/9] drm/xe/vm: Prevent binding " Arvind Yadav
2025-12-02 18:57   ` Matthew Brost
2025-12-03 11:24     ` Yadav, Arvind
2025-12-01  5:50 ` [RFC v2 8/9] drm/xe/uapi: Add UAPI for purgeable bo state to madvise query response Arvind Yadav
2025-12-02 19:01   ` Matthew Brost
2025-12-03  3:54     ` Yadav, Arvind
2025-12-01  5:50 ` [RFC v2 9/9] drm/xe: Add support for querying purgeable BO states Arvind Yadav
2025-12-02 18:36 ` [RFC v2 0/9] drm/xe/madvise: Add support for purgeable buffer objects Souza, Jose

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aS4geyZDuwlcyc9R@lstrano-desk.jf.intel.com \
    --to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=arvind.yadav@intel.com \
    --cc=himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=pallavi.mishra@intel.com \
    --cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox