From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: "Nguyen, Brian3" <brian3.nguyen@intel.com>
Cc: "intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Upadhyay, Tejas" <tejas.upadhyay@intel.com>,
"Lin, Shuicheng" <shuicheng.lin@intel.com>,
"Summers, Stuart" <stuart.summers@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/11] drm/xe: Create page reclaim list on unbind
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2025 10:34:19 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aSX2qxiSvdNrXvbX@lstrano-desk.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SA1PR11MB883987BC9C5A7FCAE239C273AAD1A@SA1PR11MB8839.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
On Tue, Nov 25, 2025 at 04:18:19AM -0700, Nguyen, Brian3 wrote:
> On Saturday, November 22, 2025 11:18 AM, Matthew Brost wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 05:05:47PM +0800, Brian Nguyen wrote:
> > > Page reclaim list (PRL) is preparation work for the page reclaim feature.
> > > The PRL is firstly owned by pt_update_ops and all other page reclaim
> > > operations will point back to this PRL. PRL generates its entries
> > > during the unbind page walker, updating the PRL.
> > >
> > > This PRL is restricted to a 4K page, so 512 page entries at most.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Brian Nguyen <brian3.nguyen@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile | 1 +
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_gtt_defs.h | 1 +
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_page_reclaim.c | 52 ++++++++++++
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_page_reclaim.h | 49 ++++++++++++
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c | 109 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt_types.h | 5 ++
> > > 6 files changed, 217 insertions(+)
> > > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_page_reclaim.c
> > > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_page_reclaim.h
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile
> > > index e4b273b025d2..048e6c93271c 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile
> > > @@ -95,6 +95,7 @@ xe-y += xe_bb.o \
> > > xe_oa.o \
> > > xe_observation.o \
> > > xe_pagefault.o \
> > > + xe_page_reclaim.o \
> > > xe_pat.o \
> > > xe_pci.o \
> > > xe_pcode.o \
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_gtt_defs.h
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_gtt_defs.h
> > > index 4389e5a76f89..4d83461e538b 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_gtt_defs.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_gtt_defs.h
> > > @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
> > > #define XELPG_GGTT_PTE_PAT0 BIT_ULL(52)
> > > #define XELPG_GGTT_PTE_PAT1 BIT_ULL(53)
> > >
> > > +#define XE_PTE_ADDR_MASK GENMASK_ULL(51, 12)
> > > #define GGTT_PTE_VFID GENMASK_ULL(11, 2)
> > >
> > > #define GUC_GGTT_TOP 0xFEE00000
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_page_reclaim.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_page_reclaim.c
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 000000000000..a0d15efff58c
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_page_reclaim.c
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
> > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
> > > +/*
> > > + * Copyright (c) 2025 Intel Corporation */
> > > +
> > > +#include <linux/bitfield.h>
> > > +#include <linux/kref.h>
> > > +#include <linux/mm.h>
> > > +#include <linux/slab.h>
> > > +
> > > +#include "xe_page_reclaim.h"
> > > +
> > > +#include "regs/xe_gt_regs.h"
> > > +#include "xe_assert.h"
> > > +#include "xe_macros.h"
> > > +
> > > +/**
> > > + * xe_page_reclaim_list_invalidate() - Mark a PRL as invalid
> > > + * @prl: Page reclaim list to reset
> > > + *
> > > + * Clears the entries pointer and marks the list as invalid so
> > > + * future use know PRL is unusable. It is expected that the entries
> > > + * have already been released.
> > > + */
> > > +void xe_page_reclaim_list_invalidate(struct xe_page_reclaim_list
> > > +*prl) {
> > > + prl->entries = NULL;
> > > + prl->num_entries = XE_PAGE_RECLAIM_INVALID_LIST; }
> > > +
> > > +/**
> > > + * xe_page_reclaim_list_alloc_entries() - Allocate page reclaim list
> > > +entries
> > > + * @prl: Page reclaim list to allocate entries for
> > > + *
> > > + * Allocate one 4K page for the PRL entries, otherwise assign prl->entries to NULL.
> > > + */
> > > +int xe_page_reclaim_list_alloc_entries(struct xe_page_reclaim_list
> > > +*prl) {
> > > + struct page *page;
> > > +
> > > + XE_WARN_ON(prl->entries != NULL);
> > > + if (prl->entries)
> > > + return 0;
> > > +
> > > + page = alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO);
> > > + if (page) {
> > > + prl->entries = page_address(page);
> > > + prl->num_entries = 0;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + return page ? 0 : -ENOMEM;
> > > +}
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_page_reclaim.h
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_page_reclaim.h
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 000000000000..d066d7d97f79
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_page_reclaim.h
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
> > > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT */
> > > +/*
> > > + * Copyright (c) 2025 Intel Corporation */
> > > +
> > > +#ifndef _XE_PAGE_RECLAIM_H_
> > > +#define _XE_PAGE_RECLAIM_H_
> > > +
> > > +#include <linux/kref.h>
> > > +#include <linux/mm.h>
> > > +#include <linux/slab.h>
> > > +#include <linux/types.h>
> > > +#include <linux/workqueue.h>
> > > +
> > > +#define XE_PAGE_RECLAIM_MAX_ENTRIES 512
> > > +#define XE_PAGE_RECLAIM_LIST_MAX_SIZE SZ_4K
> > > +
> > > +struct xe_guc_page_reclaim_entry {
> > > + u32 valid:1;
> > > + u32 reclamation_size:6;
> > > + u32 reserved:5;
> > > + u32 address_lo:20;
> > > + u32 address_hi:20;
> > > + u32 reserved1:12;
> >
> > This is wire interface with the GuC. Bitfields can based on endianess of the CPU. I
> > know this is a iGPU feature for now but it could possibly change in the future, with
> > that, to future proof can the layout of this be setup via defines / macros?
> >
>
> Sure, I moved over to the typical FIELD_PREP/GENMASK macros used elsewhere
> for the guc interfaces.
>
> > > +} __packed;
> > > +
> > > +struct xe_page_reclaim_list {
> > > + /** @entries: array of page reclaim entries, page allocated */
> > > + struct xe_guc_page_reclaim_entry *entries;
> > > + /** @num_entries: number of entries */
> > > + int num_entries;
> > > +#define XE_PAGE_RECLAIM_INVALID_LIST -1
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +void xe_page_reclaim_list_invalidate(struct xe_page_reclaim_list
> > > +*prl); int xe_page_reclaim_list_alloc_entries(struct
> > > +xe_page_reclaim_list *prl); static inline void
> > > +xe_page_reclaim_entries_get(struct xe_guc_page_reclaim_entry *entries) {
> > > + if (entries)
> > > + get_page(virt_to_page(entries));
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static inline void xe_page_reclaim_entries_put(struct
> > > +xe_guc_page_reclaim_entry *entries) {
> > > + if (entries)
> > > + put_page(virt_to_page(entries));
> > > +}
> >
> > Kernel doc for static inlines.
> >
>
> Added.
>
> > > +
> > > +#endif /* _XE_PAGE_RECLAIM_H_ */
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c
> > > index 884127b4d97d..532a047676d4 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c
> > > @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
> > > #include "xe_exec_queue.h"
> > > #include "xe_gt.h"
> > > #include "xe_migrate.h"
> > > +#include "xe_page_reclaim.h"
> > > #include "xe_pt_types.h"
> > > #include "xe_pt_walk.h"
> > > #include "xe_res_cursor.h"
> > > @@ -1538,6 +1539,9 @@ struct xe_pt_stage_unbind_walk {
> > > /* Output */
> > > /* @wupd: Structure to track the page-table updates we're building */
> > > struct xe_walk_update wupd;
> > > +
> > > + /** @prl: Backing pointer to page reclaim list in pt_update_ops */
> > > + struct xe_page_reclaim_list *prl;
> > > };
> > >
> > > /*
> > > @@ -1572,6 +1576,69 @@ static bool xe_pt_check_kill(u64 addr, u64 next,
> > unsigned int level,
> > > return false;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +/* Huge 2MB leaf lives directly in a level-1 table and has no
> > > +children */ static bool is_large_pte(struct xe_pt *pte) {
> > > + return pte->level == 1 && !pte->base.children; }
> > > +
> > > +/* page_size = 2^(reclamation_size + 12) */
> > > +#define COMPUTE_RECLAIM_ADDRESS_MASK(page_size)
> > \
> > > +({ \
> > > + BUILD_BUG_ON(!__builtin_constant_p(page_size)); \
> > > + ilog2(page_size) - 12; \
> >
> > s/12/XE_PTE_SHIFT ?
> >
>
> Done.
>
> > > +})
> > > +
> > > +static void generate_reclaim_entry(struct xe_tile *tile,
> > > + struct xe_page_reclaim_list *prl,
> > > + u64 pte,
> > > + struct xe_pt *xe_child)
> >
> > Nit, xe_pt can be on the same line as 'u64 pte'.
> >
>
> Done.
>
> > > +{
> > > + struct xe_guc_page_reclaim_entry *reclaim_entries = prl->entries;
> > > + u64 phys_addr = pte & XE_PTE_ADDR_MASK;
> > > + const u64 field_mask = GENMASK_ULL(19, 0);
> > > + u32 reclamation_size;
> >
> > Nit, I'd make the last variable declared on the stack for readability.
> >
>
> Ahh got it, reclamation_size moved to after num_entries.
>
> > > + const uint max_entries = XE_PAGE_RECLAIM_MAX_ENTRIES;
> > > + int num_entries = prl->num_entries;
> > > +
> > > + xe_tile_assert(tile, xe_child->level <= MAX_HUGEPTE_LEVEL);
> > > + xe_tile_assert(tile, reclaim_entries);
> > > +
> > > + if (num_entries == XE_PAGE_RECLAIM_INVALID_LIST)
> > > + return;
> > > +
> > > + /* Overflow: mark as invalid through num_entries */
> > > + if (num_entries >= max_entries) {
> > > + prl->num_entries = XE_PAGE_RECLAIM_INVALID_LIST;
> > > + return;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + /**
> > > + * reclamation_size indicates the size of the page to be
> > > + * invalidated and flushed from non-coherent cache.
> > > + * Page size is computed as 2^(reclamation_size+12) bytes.
> > > + * Only valid for these specific levels.
> > > + */
> > > +
> > > + if (xe_child->level == 0 && !(pte & XE_PTE_PS64))
> > > + reclamation_size = COMPUTE_RECLAIM_ADDRESS_MASK(SZ_4K); /* reclamation_size = 0 */
> > > + else if (xe_child->level == 0)
> > > + reclamation_size = COMPUTE_RECLAIM_ADDRESS_MASK(SZ_64K); /* reclamation_size = 1 */
> > > + else if (is_large_pte(xe_child))
> > > + reclamation_size = COMPUTE_RECLAIM_ADDRESS_MASK(SZ_2M); /* reclamation_size = 2 */
> >
> > What happens if we have 1G page? That doesn't seem to be handled.
> >
>
> Page reclamation hardware does not support 1G page. This should
> be handled and fallback to standard TLB invalidation PPC flush. I can add
Make sense that we fallback. I am however not seeing where this fallback occurs.
> a comment somewhere discussing this but the format for PRL only
> supports 4K, 64K, and 2M pages to reclaim. I'll add a comment here
> mentioning the HW support being limited to these pages and rename the
> is_large_pte to is_2m_pte.
>
> > > + else
> > > + return;
I would think for the fallback, we'd set prl->num_entries to
XE_PAGE_RECLAIM_INVALID_LIST here.
Maybe I'm missing something?
Matt
> > > +
> > > + reclaim_entries[num_entries].valid = 1;
> > > + reclaim_entries[num_entries].reclamation_size =
> > > + reclamation_size;
> > > + reclaim_entries[num_entries].address_lo =
> > > + FIELD_GET(field_mask, phys_addr);
> > > + reclaim_entries[num_entries].address_hi =
> > > + FIELD_GET(field_mask, phys_addr >> 20);
> >
> > As suggested above, use macros/defines here to setup the entry.
> >
>
> Got it, moved over to using other standard define macros.
>
> > > + prl->num_entries++;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > static int xe_pt_stage_unbind_entry(struct xe_ptw *parent, pgoff_t offset,
> > > unsigned int level, u64 addr, u64 next,
> > > struct xe_ptw **child,
> > > @@ -1579,10 +1646,27 @@ static int xe_pt_stage_unbind_entry(struct xe_ptw
> > *parent, pgoff_t offset,
> > > struct xe_pt_walk *walk)
> > > {
> > > struct xe_pt *xe_child = container_of(*child, typeof(*xe_child),
> > > base);
> > > + struct xe_pt_stage_unbind_walk *xe_walk =
> > > + container_of(walk, typeof(*xe_walk), base);
> > > + struct xe_device *xe = tile_to_xe(xe_walk->tile);
> > >
> > > XE_WARN_ON(!*child);
> > > XE_WARN_ON(!level);
> > >
> > > + /* 4K and 64K Pages are level 0, large pte needs additional handling. */
> > > + if (xe_walk->prl && (xe_child->level == 0 ||
> > > +is_large_pte(xe_child))) {
> >
> > And also here? 1G pages are unhandled? Please explain.
> >
>
> As stated above, page reclamation only supports 4K, 64K, and 2M pages.
> 1G page will have to fallback to the standard tlb invalidation with PPC flush.
>
> > > + struct iosys_map *leaf_map = &xe_child->bo->vmap;
> > > + pgoff_t first = xe_pt_offset(addr, 0, walk);
> > > + pgoff_t count = xe_pt_num_entries(addr, next, 0, walk);
> > > +
> > > + for (pgoff_t i = 0; i < count; i++) {
> > > + u64 pte = xe_map_rd(xe, leaf_map, (first + i) * sizeof(u64),
> > u64);
> > > +
> > > + generate_reclaim_entry(xe_walk->tile, xe_walk->prl,
> > > + pte, xe_child);
> > > + }
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > xe_pt_check_kill(addr, next, level - 1, xe_child, action, walk);
> > >
> > > return 0;
> > > @@ -1654,6 +1738,8 @@ static unsigned int xe_pt_stage_unbind(struct
> > > xe_tile *tile, {
> > > u64 start = range ? xe_svm_range_start(range) : xe_vma_start(vma);
> > > u64 end = range ? xe_svm_range_end(range) : xe_vma_end(vma);
> > > + struct xe_vm_pgtable_update_op *pt_update_op =
> > > + container_of(entries, struct xe_vm_pgtable_update_op,
> > entries[0]);
> > > struct xe_pt_stage_unbind_walk xe_walk = {
> > > .base = {
> > > .ops = &xe_pt_stage_unbind_ops,
> > > @@ -1665,6 +1751,7 @@ static unsigned int xe_pt_stage_unbind(struct xe_tile
> > *tile,
> > > .modified_start = start,
> > > .modified_end = end,
> > > .wupd.entries = entries,
> > > + .prl = pt_update_op->prl,
> > > };
> > > struct xe_pt *pt = vm->pt_root[tile->id];
> > >
> > > @@ -1897,6 +1984,7 @@ static int unbind_op_prepare(struct xe_tile *tile,
> > > struct xe_vm_pgtable_update_ops *pt_update_ops,
> > > struct xe_vma *vma)
> > > {
> > > + struct xe_device *xe = tile_to_xe(tile);
> > > u32 current_op = pt_update_ops->current_op;
> > > struct xe_vm_pgtable_update_op *pt_op = &pt_update_ops-
> > >ops[current_op];
> > > int err;
> > > @@ -1914,6 +2002,13 @@ static int unbind_op_prepare(struct xe_tile *tile,
> > > pt_op->vma = vma;
> > > pt_op->bind = false;
> > > pt_op->rebind = false;
> > > + /* Maintain one PRL located in pt_update_ops that all others in unbind op
> > reference */
> > > + if (xe->info.has_page_reclaim_hw_assist && !pt_update_ops->prl.entries) {
> > > + err = xe_page_reclaim_list_alloc_entries(&pt_update_ops->prl);
> > > + if (err < 0)
> > > + xe_page_reclaim_list_invalidate(&pt_update_ops->prl);
> >
> > I don't think you need to call xe_page_reclaim_list_invalidate, right?
> > If xe_page_reclaim_list_alloc_entries fails the prl should be in the init state.
> >
>
> Yes. I'll drop this call for now then.
>
> > > + }
> > > + pt_op->prl = (pt_update_ops->prl.entries) ? &pt_update_ops->prl :
> > > +NULL;
> > >
> > > err = vma_reserve_fences(tile_to_xe(tile), vma);
> > > if (err)
> > > @@ -1921,6 +2016,13 @@ static int unbind_op_prepare(struct xe_tile
> > > *tile,
> > >
> > > pt_op->num_entries = xe_pt_stage_unbind(tile, xe_vma_vm(vma),
> > > vma, NULL, pt_op->entries);
> > > + /* Free PRL if list declared as invalid */
> > > + if (pt_update_ops->prl.entries &&
> > > + pt_update_ops->prl.num_entries == XE_PAGE_RECLAIM_INVALID_LIST) {
> > > + xe_page_reclaim_entries_put(pt_update_ops->prl.entries);
> > > + pt_op->prl = NULL;
> > > + pt_update_ops->prl.entries = NULL;
> >
> > Call xe_page_reclaim_list_invalidate for clarity?
> >
>
> Updated.
>
> > > + }
> > >
> > > xe_vm_dbg_print_entries(tile_to_xe(tile), pt_op->entries,
> > > pt_op->num_entries, false);
> > > @@ -1979,6 +2081,7 @@ static int unbind_range_prepare(struct xe_vm *vm,
> > > pt_op->vma = XE_INVALID_VMA;
> > > pt_op->bind = false;
> > > pt_op->rebind = false;
> > > + pt_op->prl = NULL;
> > >
> > > pt_op->num_entries = xe_pt_stage_unbind(tile, vm, NULL, range,
> > > pt_op->entries);
> > > @@ -2096,6 +2199,7 @@ xe_pt_update_ops_init(struct
> > xe_vm_pgtable_update_ops *pt_update_ops)
> > > init_llist_head(&pt_update_ops->deferred);
> > > pt_update_ops->start = ~0x0ull;
> > > pt_update_ops->last = 0x0ull;
> > > + xe_page_reclaim_list_invalidate(&pt_update_ops->prl);
> >
> > Can we introduce a function called xe_page_reclaim_list_init for clarity? It might
> > do the same thing as xe_page_reclaim_list_invalidate but it would make this a
> > little more clear. Likewise later in the series when a job is created, you can call
> > xe_page_reclaim_list_init there too.
> >
>
> Sure, I'll write another helper for this and modify both those PRL creation points.
>
> > > }
> > >
> > > /**
> > > @@ -2518,6 +2622,11 @@ void xe_pt_update_ops_fini(struct xe_tile *tile, struct xe_vma_ops *vops)
> > > &vops->pt_update_ops[tile->id];
> > > int i;
> > >
> > > + if (pt_update_ops->prl.entries) {
> > > + xe_page_reclaim_entries_put(pt_update_ops->prl.entries);
> > > + xe_page_reclaim_list_invalidate(&pt_update_ops->prl);
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > lockdep_assert_held(&vops->vm->lock);
> > > xe_vm_assert_held(vops->vm);
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt_types.h
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt_types.h
> > > index 881f01e14db8..26e5295f118e 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt_types.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt_types.h
> > > @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
> > >
> > > #include <linux/types.h>
> > >
> > > +#include "xe_page_reclaim.h"
> > > #include "xe_pt_walk.h"
> > >
> > > struct xe_bo;
> > > @@ -85,6 +86,8 @@ struct xe_vm_pgtable_update_op {
> > > bool bind;
> > > /** @rebind: is a rebind */
> > > bool rebind;
> > > + /** @prl: Backing pointer to page reclaim list of pt_update_ops */
> > > + struct xe_page_reclaim_list *prl;
> >
> > Can you move this above the bools in the layout of xe_vm_pgtable_update_op,
> > likely just below "struct xe_vma".
> >
>
> Ahh got it. Moved.
>
> > > };
> > >
> > > /** struct xe_vm_pgtable_update_ops: page table update operations */
> > > @@ -119,6 +122,8 @@ struct xe_vm_pgtable_update_ops {
> > > * slots are idle.
> > > */
> > > bool wait_vm_kernel;
> > > + /** @prl: embedded page reclaim list */
> > > + struct xe_page_reclaim_list prl;
> >
> > Same thing here, move just below "struct xe_exec_queue".
> >
> > Matt
> >
>
> Moved.
>
> Brian
>
> > > };
> > >
> > > #endif
> > > --
> > > 2.51.2
> > >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-25 18:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-18 9:05 [PATCH 00/11] Page Reclamation Support for Xe3p Platforms Brian Nguyen
2025-11-18 9:05 ` [PATCH 01/11] [DO, NOT, REVIEW] drm/xe: Do not forward invalid TLB invalidation seqnos to upper layers Brian Nguyen
2025-11-18 9:05 ` [PATCH 02/11] drm/xe: Reset tlb fence timeout on invalid seqno received Brian Nguyen
2025-11-21 17:23 ` Lin, Shuicheng
2025-11-22 1:53 ` Nguyen, Brian3
2025-11-22 18:25 ` Matthew Brost
2025-11-25 11:01 ` Nguyen, Brian3
2025-11-18 9:05 ` [PATCH 03/11] drm/xe/xe_tlb_inval: Modify fence interface to support PPC flush Brian Nguyen
2025-11-21 18:02 ` Lin, Shuicheng
2025-11-22 1:54 ` Nguyen, Brian3
2025-11-22 19:32 ` Matthew Brost
2025-11-25 11:07 ` Nguyen, Brian3
2025-11-18 9:05 ` [PATCH 04/11] drm/xe: Add page reclamation info to device info Brian Nguyen
2025-11-21 18:15 ` Lin, Shuicheng
2025-11-22 18:31 ` Matthew Brost
2025-11-18 9:05 ` [PATCH 05/11] drm/xe/guc: Add page reclamation interface to GuC Brian Nguyen
2025-11-21 18:32 ` Lin, Shuicheng
2025-11-22 1:56 ` Nguyen, Brian3
2025-11-22 18:39 ` Matthew Brost
2025-11-25 11:13 ` Nguyen, Brian3
2025-11-18 9:05 ` [PATCH 06/11] drm/xe: Create page reclaim list on unbind Brian Nguyen
2025-11-21 21:29 ` Lin, Shuicheng
2025-11-22 1:57 ` Nguyen, Brian3
2025-11-22 19:18 ` Matthew Brost
2025-11-25 11:18 ` Nguyen, Brian3
2025-11-25 18:34 ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2025-11-25 19:01 ` Nguyen, Brian3
2025-11-25 19:07 ` Matthew Brost
2025-11-25 19:46 ` Nguyen, Brian3
2025-11-25 22:35 ` Matthew Brost
2025-11-26 2:33 ` Nguyen, Brian3
2025-11-18 9:05 ` [PATCH 07/11] drm/xe: Suballocate BO for page reclaim Brian Nguyen
2025-11-22 19:42 ` Matthew Brost
2025-11-25 11:20 ` Nguyen, Brian3
2025-11-18 9:05 ` [PATCH 08/11] drm/xe: Prep page reclaim in tlb inval job Brian Nguyen
2025-11-22 13:52 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-11-25 11:20 ` Nguyen, Brian3
2025-11-18 9:05 ` [PATCH 09/11] drm/xe: Append page reclamation action to tlb inval Brian Nguyen
2025-11-18 9:05 ` [PATCH 10/11] drm/xe: Optimize flushing of L2$ by skipping unnecessary page reclaim Brian Nguyen
2025-11-24 12:29 ` Matthew Auld
2025-11-25 6:12 ` Nguyen, Brian3
2025-11-25 11:48 ` Upadhyay, Tejas
2025-11-25 13:05 ` Upadhyay, Tejas
2025-11-18 9:05 ` [PATCH 11/11] drm/xe: Add debugfs support for page reclamation Brian Nguyen
2025-11-21 22:32 ` Lin, Shuicheng
2025-11-22 1:57 ` Nguyen, Brian3
2025-11-22 14:18 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-11-25 11:21 ` Nguyen, Brian3
2025-11-18 9:52 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Page Reclamation Support for Xe3p Platforms Patchwork
2025-11-18 9:53 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-11-18 13:02 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aSX2qxiSvdNrXvbX@lstrano-desk.jf.intel.com \
--to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=brian3.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=shuicheng.lin@intel.com \
--cc=stuart.summers@intel.com \
--cc=tejas.upadhyay@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox