From: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>
To: Karthik Poosa <karthik.poosa@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, anshuman.gupta@intel.com,
badal.nilawar@intel.com, rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] drm/xe/hwmon: Expose memory controller temperature
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2026 11:56:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aWDe56t90FND09x2@black.igk.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260108130323.426531-3-karthik.poosa@intel.com>
On Thu, Jan 08, 2026 at 06:33:21PM +0530, Karthik Poosa wrote:
> Expose GPU memory controller average temperature and its limits
> under temp4_xxx.
Same comments as last patch.
> Update Xe hwmon documentation for this.
>
> v2:
> - Rephrase commit message. (Badal)
> - Update kernel version in Xe hwmon documentation. (Raag)
>
> v3:
> - Update kernel version in Xe hwmon documentation.
> - Address review comments from Raag.
> - Remove obvious comments.
> - Remove redundant debug logs.
> - Remove unnecessary checks.
> - Avoid magic numbers.
> - Add new comments.
> - Use temperature sensors count to make memory controller visible.
> - Use temperature limits of package for memory controller.
>
> Signed-off-by: Karthik Poosa <karthik.poosa@intel.com>
> ---
> .../ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-intel-xe-hwmon | 24 ++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hwmon.c | 86 ++++++++++++++++++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pcode_api.h | 4 +
> 3 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-intel-xe-hwmon b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-intel-xe-hwmon
> index c3b367c42741..a9fcfa6f11b9 100644
> --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-intel-xe-hwmon
> +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-intel-xe-hwmon
> @@ -236,3 +236,27 @@ Contact: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
> Description: RO. VRAM critical temperature in millidegree Celsius.
>
> Only supported for particular Intel Xe graphics platforms.
> +
> +What: /sys/bus/pci/drivers/xe/.../hwmon/hwmon<i>/temp4_input
> +Date: January 2026
> +KernelVersion: 7.0
> +Contact: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
> +Description: RO. Memory controller average temperature in millidegree Celsius.
> +
> + Only supported for particular Intel Xe graphics platforms.
> +
> +What: /sys/bus/pci/drivers/xe/.../hwmon/hwmon<i>/temp4_emergency
> +Date: January 2026
> +KernelVersion: 7.0
> +Contact: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
> +Description: RO. Memory controller shutdown temperature in millidegree Celsius.
> +
> + Only supported for particular Intel Xe graphics platforms.
> +
> +What: /sys/bus/pci/drivers/xe/.../hwmon/hwmon<i>/temp4_crit
> +Date: January 2026
> +KernelVersion: 7.0
> +Contact: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
> +Description: RO. Memory controller critical temperature in millidegree Celsius.
> +
> + Only supported for particular Intel Xe graphics platforms.
Same comments as last patch.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hwmon.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hwmon.c
> index db00728c89e4..2bf5c9ac948a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hwmon.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hwmon.c
> @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ enum xe_hwmon_channel {
> CHANNEL_CARD,
> CHANNEL_PKG,
> CHANNEL_VRAM,
> + CHANNEL_MCTRL,
> CHANNEL_MAX,
> };
>
> @@ -100,6 +101,11 @@ enum sensor_attr_power {
> */
> #define PL_WRITE_MBX_TIMEOUT_MS (1)
>
> +/*
> + * Maximum number of thermal sensors supported by hardware.
> + */
> +#define MAX_THERMAL_SENSORS (255)
I don't think we need this, see below.
> +
> /**
> * struct xe_hwmon_energy_info - to accumulate energy
> */
> @@ -130,6 +136,10 @@ struct xe_hwmon_thermal_info {
> /** @data: temperature limits in dwords */
> u32 data[(TEMP_LIMIT_MAX / sizeof(u32)) + ((TEMP_LIMIT_MAX % sizeof(u32)) ? 1 : 0)];
> };
> + /** @count: no of temperature sensors available for the platform */
> + u8 count;
> + /** @value: value from each sensor, bit 7 is for sign and 6:0 for value */
Nit: "Signed value from each sensor" would be sufficient.
> + s8 value[MAX_THERMAL_SENSORS];
Just use U8_MAX and add a comment that it's the size of count member.
> };
>
> /**
> @@ -703,6 +713,7 @@ static const struct hwmon_channel_info * const hwmon_info[] = {
> HWMON_T_LABEL,
> HWMON_T_LABEL | HWMON_T_INPUT | HWMON_T_EMERGENCY | HWMON_T_CRIT |
> HWMON_T_MAX,
> + HWMON_T_LABEL | HWMON_T_INPUT | HWMON_T_EMERGENCY | HWMON_T_CRIT,
Alphabetic order please!
> HWMON_T_LABEL | HWMON_T_INPUT | HWMON_T_EMERGENCY | HWMON_T_CRIT),
> HWMON_CHANNEL_INFO(power, HWMON_P_MAX | HWMON_P_RATED_MAX | HWMON_P_LABEL | HWMON_P_CRIT |
> HWMON_P_CAP,
> @@ -718,15 +729,58 @@ static int xe_hwmon_pcode_read_thermal_info(struct xe_hwmon *hwmon)
> {
> struct xe_tile *root_tile = xe_device_get_root_tile(hwmon->xe);
> int ret = 0;
> + u32 val = 0;
Make this config.
> ret = xe_pcode_read(root_tile, PCODE_MBOX(PCODE_THERMAL_INFO, READ_THERMAL_LIMITS, 0),
> &hwmon->temp.data[0], &hwmon->temp.data[1]);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> drm_dbg(&hwmon->xe->drm, "thermal info read val 0x%x val1 0x%x\n",
> hwmon->temp.data[0], hwmon->temp.data[1]);
>
> + ret = xe_pcode_read(root_tile, PCODE_MBOX(PCODE_THERMAL_INFO, READ_THERMAL_CONFIG, 0),
> + &val, NULL);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + drm_dbg(&hwmon->xe->drm, "thermal config count %d\n", val);
> + hwmon->temp.count = val & TEMP_MASK;
> +
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static int get_mc_temp(struct xe_hwmon *hwmon, long *val)
> +{
> + struct xe_tile *root_tile = xe_device_get_root_tile(hwmon->xe);
> + int ret = 0, i = 0;
Redundant initializations.
> + u32 *dword = (u32 *)hwmon->temp.value;
Use reverse xmas tree order.
> + s16 average = 0;
I know this does the job but let's use s32 for uniformity.
> + for (i = 0; i < (hwmon->temp.count / sizeof(u32)); i++) {
Hm... see below.
> + ret = xe_pcode_read(root_tile, PCODE_MBOX(PCODE_THERMAL_INFO, READ_THERMAL_DATA, i),
> + (dword + i), NULL);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + drm_dbg(&hwmon->xe->drm, "thermal data for group %d val 0x%x\n", i, dword[i]);
> + }
> +
> + if (hwmon->temp.count % (sizeof(u32))) {
I think the correct logic would be to use
(((hwmon->temp.count - 1)/ sizeof(u32)) + 1) as loop condition,
or did I miss something?
> + ret = xe_pcode_read(root_tile, PCODE_MBOX(PCODE_THERMAL_INFO, READ_THERMAL_DATA, i),
> + (dword + i), NULL);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + drm_dbg(&hwmon->xe->drm, "thermal data for group %d val 0x%x\n", i, dword[i]);
> + }
> +
> + for (i = TEMP_INDEX_MCTRL; i < hwmon->temp.count - 1; i++)
> + average += hwmon->temp.value[i];
> +
> + average /= (hwmon->temp.count - TEMP_INDEX_MCTRL - 1);
> + *val = average * MILLIDEGREE_PER_DEGREE;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> /* I1 is exposed as power_crit or as curr_crit depending on bit 31 */
> static int xe_hwmon_pcode_read_i1(const struct xe_hwmon *hwmon, u32 *uval)
> {
> @@ -831,6 +885,8 @@ xe_hwmon_temp_is_visible(struct xe_hwmon *hwmon, u32 attr, int channel)
> return hwmon->temp.limit[TEMP_LIMIT_PKG_SHUTDOWN] ? 0444 : 0;
> case CHANNEL_VRAM:
> return hwmon->temp.limit[TEMP_LIMIT_MEM_SHUTDOWN] ? 0444 : 0;
> + case CHANNEL_MCTRL:
> + return hwmon->temp.count ? 0444 : 0;
> default:
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -841,6 +897,8 @@ xe_hwmon_temp_is_visible(struct xe_hwmon *hwmon, u32 attr, int channel)
> return hwmon->temp.limit[TEMP_LIMIT_PKG_TJMAX] ? 0444 : 0;
> case CHANNEL_VRAM:
> return hwmon->temp.limit[TEMP_LIMIT_MEM_TJMAX] ? 0444 : 0;
> + case CHANNEL_MCTRL:
> + return hwmon->temp.count ? 0444 : 0;
> default:
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -855,7 +913,16 @@ xe_hwmon_temp_is_visible(struct xe_hwmon *hwmon, u32 attr, int channel)
> break;
> case hwmon_temp_input:
> case hwmon_temp_label:
> - return xe_reg_is_valid(xe_hwmon_get_reg(hwmon, REG_TEMP, channel)) ? 0444 : 0;
> + switch (channel) {
> + case CHANNEL_PKG:
> + case CHANNEL_VRAM:
> + return xe_reg_is_valid(xe_hwmon_get_reg(hwmon, REG_TEMP,
> + channel)) ? 0444 : 0;
Align with correct braces.
> + case CHANNEL_MCTRL:
> + return hwmon->temp.count ? 0444 : 0;
> + default:
> + return 0;
> + }
> default:
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -869,14 +936,22 @@ xe_hwmon_temp_read(struct xe_hwmon *hwmon, u32 attr, int channel, long *val)
>
> switch (attr) {
> case hwmon_temp_input:
> - reg_val = xe_mmio_read32(mmio, xe_hwmon_get_reg(hwmon, REG_TEMP, channel));
> + switch (channel) {
> + case CHANNEL_PKG:
> + case CHANNEL_VRAM:
> + reg_val = xe_mmio_read32(mmio, xe_hwmon_get_reg(hwmon, REG_TEMP, channel));
>
> - /* HW register value is in degrees Celsius, convert to millidegrees. */
> - *val = REG_FIELD_GET(TEMP_MASK, reg_val) * MILLIDEGREE_PER_DEGREE;
> + /* HW register value is in degrees Celsius, convert to millidegrees. */
> + *val = REG_FIELD_GET(TEMP_MASK, reg_val) * MILLIDEGREE_PER_DEGREE;
> + break;
Nope, just return.
> + case CHANNEL_MCTRL:
> + return get_mc_temp(hwmon, val);
Add a default case with return 0 to make static checker happy (and also
in all other similar places).
> + }
> break;
> case hwmon_temp_emergency:
> switch (channel) {
> case CHANNEL_PKG:
> + case CHANNEL_MCTRL:
> *val = hwmon->temp.limit[TEMP_LIMIT_PKG_SHUTDOWN] * MILLIDEGREE_PER_DEGREE;
> break;
> case CHANNEL_VRAM:
> @@ -887,6 +962,7 @@ xe_hwmon_temp_read(struct xe_hwmon *hwmon, u32 attr, int channel, long *val)
> case hwmon_temp_crit:
> switch (channel) {
> case CHANNEL_PKG:
> + case CHANNEL_MCTRL:
> *val = hwmon->temp.limit[TEMP_LIMIT_PKG_TJMAX] * MILLIDEGREE_PER_DEGREE;
> break;
> case CHANNEL_VRAM:
> @@ -1263,6 +1339,8 @@ static int xe_hwmon_read_label(struct device *dev,
> *str = "pkg";
> else if (channel == CHANNEL_VRAM)
> *str = "vram";
> + else if (channel == CHANNEL_MCTRL)
> + *str = "mctrl";
> return 0;
> case hwmon_power:
> case hwmon_energy:
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pcode_api.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pcode_api.h
> index 6c84c1780fe9..fc8811a87741 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pcode_api.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pcode_api.h
> @@ -67,6 +67,10 @@
>
> #define PCODE_THERMAL_INFO 0x25
> #define READ_THERMAL_LIMITS 0x0
> +#define READ_THERMAL_CONFIG 0x1
> +#define READ_THERMAL_DATA 0x2
> +#define TEMP_INDEX_MCTRL 0x2
This is not used by pcode and should not be in this file. I think the right
place for it would be xe_hwmon.c.
> +#define TEMP_MASK_MAILBOX REG_GENMASK8(6, 0)
Is this used in this patch?
Raag
> #define PCODE_FREQUENCY_CONFIG 0x6e
> /* Frequency Config Sub Commands (param1) */
> --
> 2.25.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-09 10:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-08 13:03 [PATCH v4 0/4] drm/xe/hwmon: Expose new temperature attributes Karthik Poosa
2026-01-08 13:03 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] drm/xe/hwmon: Expose temperature limits Karthik Poosa
2026-01-09 9:29 ` Raag Jadav
2026-01-09 13:42 ` Poosa, Karthik
2026-01-09 14:24 ` Poosa, Karthik
2026-01-08 13:03 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] drm/xe/hwmon: Expose memory controller temperature Karthik Poosa
2026-01-09 10:56 ` Raag Jadav [this message]
2026-01-08 13:03 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] drm/xe/hwmon: Expose GPU pcie temperature Karthik Poosa
2026-01-09 13:26 ` Raag Jadav
2026-01-08 13:03 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] drm/xe/hwmon: Expose individual vram channel temperature Karthik Poosa
2026-01-08 13:20 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe/hwmon: Expose new temperature attributes (rev5) Patchwork
2026-01-08 13:58 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-01-08 19:02 ` ✓ Xe.CI.Full: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aWDe56t90FND09x2@black.igk.intel.com \
--to=raag.jadav@intel.com \
--cc=anshuman.gupta@intel.com \
--cc=badal.nilawar@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=karthik.poosa@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox