From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Thomas Hellstrom <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@ffwll.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] drm/xe: Replace use of system_wq with tlb_inval->timeout_wq
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2026 18:54:46 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aWWz9pJ30Hxa0USG@lstrano-desk.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260112094406.82641-1-marco.crivellari@suse.com>
On Mon, Jan 12, 2026 at 10:44:06AM +0100, Marco Crivellari wrote:
> This patch continues the effort to refactor workqueue APIs, which has begun
> with the changes introducing new workqueues and a new alloc_workqueue flag:
>
> commit 128ea9f6ccfb ("workqueue: Add system_percpu_wq and system_dfl_wq")
> commit 930c2ea566af ("workqueue: Add new WQ_PERCPU flag")
>
> The point of the refactoring is to eventually alter the default behavior of
> workqueues to become unbound by default so that their workload placement is
> optimized by the scheduler.
>
> Before that to happen, workqueue users must be converted to the better named
> new workqueues with no intended behaviour changes:
>
> system_wq -> system_percpu_wq
> system_unbound_wq -> system_dfl_wq
>
> This way the old obsolete workqueues (system_wq, system_unbound_wq) can be
> removed in the future.
>
> After a carefully evaluation, because this is the fence signaling path, we
> changed the code in order to use one of the Xe's workqueue.
>
> So, a new workqueue named 'timeout_wq' has been added to
> 'struct xe_tlb_inval' and has been initialized with 'gt->ordered_wq'
> changing the system_wq uses with tlb_inval->timeout_wq.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250221112003.1dSuoGyc@linutronix.de/
> Suggested-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> ---
> Changes in v3:
> - refactoring workqueue name from fence_signal_wq to timeout_wq.
>
> - rebased on v6.19-rc5.
>
> Changes in v2:
> - added 'fence_signal_wq', initialized with 'gt->ordered_wq' in order to use
> it in the fence signaling path, instead of system_wq.
>
> - rebased on v6.19-rc4.
>
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_tlb_inval.c | 10 +++++++---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_tlb_inval_types.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_tlb_inval.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_tlb_inval.c
> index 918a59e686ea..084d996b818d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_tlb_inval.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_tlb_inval.c
> @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ static void xe_tlb_inval_fence_timeout(struct work_struct *work)
> xe_tlb_inval_fence_signal(fence);
> }
> if (!list_empty(&tlb_inval->pending_fences))
> - queue_delayed_work(system_wq, &tlb_inval->fence_tdr,
> + queue_delayed_work(tlb_inval->timeout_wq, &tlb_inval->fence_tdr,
> timeout_delay);
> spin_unlock_irq(&tlb_inval->pending_lock);
> }
> @@ -146,6 +146,10 @@ int xe_gt_tlb_inval_init_early(struct xe_gt *gt)
> if (IS_ERR(tlb_inval->job_wq))
> return PTR_ERR(tlb_inval->job_wq);
>
> + tlb_inval->timeout_wq = gt->ordered_wq;
> + if (IS_ERR(tlb_inval->timeout_wq))
> + return PTR_ERR(tlb_inval->timeout_wq);
> +
> /* XXX: Blindly setting up backend to GuC */
> xe_guc_tlb_inval_init_early(>->uc.guc, tlb_inval);
>
> @@ -226,7 +230,7 @@ static void xe_tlb_inval_fence_prep(struct xe_tlb_inval_fence *fence)
> list_add_tail(&fence->link, &tlb_inval->pending_fences);
>
> if (list_is_singular(&tlb_inval->pending_fences))
> - queue_delayed_work(system_wq, &tlb_inval->fence_tdr,
> + queue_delayed_work(tlb_inval->timeout_wq, &tlb_inval->fence_tdr,
> tlb_inval->ops->timeout_delay(tlb_inval));
> spin_unlock_irq(&tlb_inval->pending_lock);
>
> @@ -378,7 +382,7 @@ void xe_tlb_inval_done_handler(struct xe_tlb_inval *tlb_inval, int seqno)
> }
>
> if (!list_empty(&tlb_inval->pending_fences))
> - mod_delayed_work(system_wq,
> + mod_delayed_work(tlb_inval->timeout_wq,
> &tlb_inval->fence_tdr,
> tlb_inval->ops->timeout_delay(tlb_inval));
> else
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_tlb_inval_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_tlb_inval_types.h
> index 8f8b060e9005..e5ff35226826 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_tlb_inval_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_tlb_inval_types.h
> @@ -106,6 +106,8 @@ struct xe_tlb_inval {
> struct workqueue_struct *job_wq;
> /** @tlb_inval.lock: protects TLB invalidation fences */
> spinlock_t lock;
> + /** @timeout_wq: schedules TLB invalidation fence timeouts */
> + struct workqueue_struct *timeout_wq;
> };
>
> /**
> --
> 2.52.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-13 2:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-12 9:44 [PATCH v3] drm/xe: Replace use of system_wq with tlb_inval->timeout_wq Marco Crivellari
2026-01-12 9:49 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for " Patchwork
2026-01-12 9:51 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-01-12 10:42 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-01-12 12:34 ` ✓ Xe.CI.Full: " Patchwork
2026-01-13 2:54 ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2026-01-14 7:49 ` [PATCH v3] " Matthew Brost
2026-01-14 9:21 ` Marco Crivellari
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aWWz9pJ30Hxa0USG@lstrano-desk.jf.intel.com \
--to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marco.crivellari@suse.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox