Re: [PATCH] drm/xe: Reduce LRC timestamp stuck message on VFs to notice

[Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>]

On Wed, Jan 14, 2026 at 01:25:55PM -0700, Summers, Stuart wrote:
> On Wed, 2026-01-14 at 10:49 -0800, Matthew Brost wrote:
> > An LRC timestamp getting stuck is a somewhat normal occurrence. If a
> > single VF submits a job that does not get timesliced, the LRC
> > timestamp
> > will not increment. Reduce the LRC timestamp stuck message on VFs to
> > notice (same log level as job timeout) to avoid false CI bugs in
> > tests
> > where a VF submits a job that does not get timesliced.
> 
> Ok and if this happens and there is an actual problem, the queue will
> be banned it looks like from the earlier patch, so should still be ok. 
> 
> My only question is why not move both cases (VF and non-VF) to notice?

The non-VF case the LRC timestamp should always be moving, if it isn't
something has badly gone wrong and CI should notify us of the error.

Matt

> Is the idea that in the non-VF case, the reset is already an error and
> so the extra warn is ok? But in that case I'd already expect some other
> error message to trigger CI (like the engine reset notification from
> GuC). So the extra information here really isn't doing a whole lot more
> from a warning level (CI triggering) perspective.
> 
> Thanks,
> Stuart
> 
> > 
> > Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/-/issues/7032
> > Fixes: bb63e7257e63 ("drm/xe: Avoid toggling schedule state to check
> > LRC timestamp in TDR")
> > Suggested-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
> > <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c | 11 ++++++++---
> >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
> > index be8fa76baf1d..0311c89107f9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
> > @@ -1319,9 +1319,14 @@ static bool check_timeout(struct xe_exec_queue
> > *q, struct xe_sched_job *job)
> >  
> >         ctx_timestamp = lower_32_bits(xe_lrc_timestamp(q->lrc[0]));
> >         if (ctx_timestamp == job->sample_timestamp) {
> > -               xe_gt_warn(gt, "Check job timeout: seqno=%u,
> > lrc_seqno=%u, guc_id=%d, timestamp stuck",
> > -                          xe_sched_job_seqno(job),
> > xe_sched_job_lrc_seqno(job),
> > -                          q->guc->id);
> > +               if (IS_SRIOV_VF(gt_to_xe(gt)))
> > +                       xe_gt_notice(gt, "Check job timeout:
> > seqno=%u, lrc_seqno=%u, guc_id=%d, timestamp stuck",
> > +                                    xe_sched_job_seqno(job),
> > +                                    xe_sched_job_lrc_seqno(job), q-
> > >guc->id);
> > +               else
> > +                       xe_gt_warn(gt, "Check job timeout: seqno=%u,
> > lrc_seqno=%u, guc_id=%d, timestamp stuck",
> > +                                  xe_sched_job_seqno(job),
> > +                                  xe_sched_job_lrc_seqno(job), q-
> > >guc->id);
> >  
> >                 return xe_sched_invalidate_job(job, 0);
> >         }
>