From: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: matthew.brost@intel.com, jani.nikula@intel.com,
ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com, rodrigo.vivi@intel.com,
thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com, riana.tauro@intel.com,
michal.wajdeczko@intel.com, matthew.d.roper@intel.com,
mallesh.koujalagi@intel.com, dev@lankhorst.se
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] drm/xe/irq: Introduce xe_irq_init_late()
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2026 11:38:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aYHQQvihdYGLOqeO@black.igk.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260202114609.1276227-1-raag.jadav@intel.com>
On Mon, Feb 02, 2026 at 05:14:29PM +0530, Raag Jadav wrote:
> Introduce xe_irq_init_late() which will enable the IRQs at the end of
> xe_device_probe() to make sure we don't hit them during probe sequence.
>
> Signed-off-by: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>
> ---
> PS: I'm not aware of any historic significance of current sequence.
> If I've missed anything, please let me know.
As per CI results, this looks like a bad idea. Sorry about the noise.
Raag
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c | 3 +++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_irq.c | 10 ++++++++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_irq.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> index 9cf82bde36c4..40c27e62bc01 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> @@ -1013,6 +1013,9 @@ int xe_device_probe(struct xe_device *xe)
>
> detect_preproduction_hw(xe);
>
> + /* Turn irqs on only after we're setup to service them */
> + xe_irq_init_late(xe);
> +
> return devm_add_action_or_reset(xe->drm.dev, xe_device_sanitize, xe);
>
> err_unregister_display:
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_irq.c
> index 7560a45f7f64..bf554268762e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_irq.c
> @@ -802,6 +802,14 @@ int xe_irq_init(struct xe_device *xe)
> return xe_irq_msix_init(xe);
> }
>
> +void xe_irq_init_late(struct xe_device *xe)
> +{
> + if (!atomic_read(&xe->irq.enabled))
> + return;
> +
> + xe_irq_postinstall(xe);
> +}
> +
> int xe_irq_install(struct xe_device *xe)
> {
> struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(xe->drm.dev);
> @@ -831,8 +839,6 @@ int xe_irq_install(struct xe_device *xe)
>
> atomic_set(&xe->irq.enabled, 1);
>
> - xe_irq_postinstall(xe);
> -
> return devm_add_action_or_reset(xe->drm.dev, irq_uninstall, xe);
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_irq.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_irq.h
> index a28bd577ba52..ad03e830a0b0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_irq.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_irq.h
> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ struct xe_tile;
> struct xe_gt;
>
> int xe_irq_init(struct xe_device *xe);
> +void xe_irq_init_late(struct xe_device *xe);
> int xe_irq_install(struct xe_device *xe);
> void xe_irq_suspend(struct xe_device *xe);
> void xe_irq_resume(struct xe_device *xe);
> --
> 2.43.0
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-03 10:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-02 11:44 [PATCH v1] drm/xe/irq: Introduce xe_irq_init_late() Raag Jadav
2026-02-02 22:01 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for " Patchwork
2026-02-02 23:19 ` ✗ Xe.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2026-02-03 10:38 ` Raag Jadav [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aYHQQvihdYGLOqeO@black.igk.intel.com \
--to=raag.jadav@intel.com \
--cc=dev@lankhorst.se \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=mallesh.koujalagi@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--cc=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
--cc=riana.tauro@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox