From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
John Falkowski <john.falkowski@intel.com>,
Michal Mrozek <michal.mrozek@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/xe/uapi: Introduce a flag to disallow vm overcommit in fault mode
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2026 09:58:37 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aYTaTTm+iaj2VfQt@lstrano-desk.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4a012fa66d9eb5858f41159d5b65f790d57e6297.camel@linux.intel.com>
On Thu, Feb 05, 2026 at 09:06:24AM +0100, Thomas Hellström wrote:
> On Wed, 2026-02-04 at 10:56 -0800, Matthew Brost wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 04, 2026 at 04:33:20PM +0100, Thomas Hellström wrote:
> > > Some compute applications may try to allocate device memory to
> > > probe
> > > how much device memory is actually available, assuming that the
> > > application will be the only one running on the particular GPU.
> > >
> > > That strategy fails in fault mode since it allows VM overcommit.
> > >
> > > While this could be resolved in user-space it's further complicated
> > > by cgroups potentially restricting the amount of memory available
> > > to the application.
> > >
> > > Introduce a vm create flag, DRM_XE_VM_CREATE_NO_VM_OVERCOMMIT, that
> > > allows fault mode to mimic the behaviour of !fault mode WRT this.
> > > It
> > > blocks evicting same vm bos during VM_BIND processing. However,
> > > it does *not* block evicting same-vm bos during pagefault
> > > processing, preferring eviction rather than VM banning in
> > > OOM situations.
> > >
> > > Cc: John Falkowski <john.falkowski@intel.com>
> > > Cc: Michal Mrozek <michal.mrozek@intel.com>
> > > Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c | 11 +++++++++--
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.h | 7 +++++++
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_types.h | 1 +
> > > include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h | 6 ++++++
> > > 4 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> > > index 8fe54a998385..cf92b6e13a16 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> > > @@ -1938,7 +1938,8 @@ find_ufence_get(struct xe_sync_entry *syncs,
> > > u32 num_syncs)
> > >
> > > #define ALL_DRM_XE_VM_CREATE_FLAGS
> > > (DRM_XE_VM_CREATE_FLAG_SCRATCH_PAGE | \
> > > DRM_XE_VM_CREATE_FLAG_LR_MODE
> > > | \
> > > -
> > > DRM_XE_VM_CREATE_FLAG_FAULT_MODE)
> > > +
> > > DRM_XE_VM_CREATE_FLAG_FAULT_MODE | \
> > > +
> > > DRM_XE_VM_CREATE_FLAG_NO_VM_OVERCOMMIT)
> > >
> > > int xe_vm_create_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
> > > struct drm_file *file)
> > > @@ -1977,12 +1978,18 @@ int xe_vm_create_ioctl(struct drm_device
> > > *dev, void *data,
> > > args->flags &
> > > DRM_XE_VM_CREATE_FLAG_FAULT_MODE))
> > > return -EINVAL;
> > >
> > > + if (XE_IOCTL_DBG(xe, !(args->flags &
> > > DRM_XE_VM_CREATE_FLAG_FAULT_MODE) &&
> > > + args->flags &
> > > DRM_XE_VM_CREATE_FLAG_NO_VM_OVERCOMMIT))
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > > if (args->flags & DRM_XE_VM_CREATE_FLAG_SCRATCH_PAGE)
> > > flags |= XE_VM_FLAG_SCRATCH_PAGE;
> > > if (args->flags & DRM_XE_VM_CREATE_FLAG_LR_MODE)
> > > flags |= XE_VM_FLAG_LR_MODE;
> > > if (args->flags & DRM_XE_VM_CREATE_FLAG_FAULT_MODE)
> > > flags |= XE_VM_FLAG_FAULT_MODE;
> > > + if (args->flags & DRM_XE_VM_CREATE_FLAG_NO_VM_OVERCOMMIT)
> > > + flags |= XE_VM_FLAG_NO_VM_OVERCOMMIT;
> > >
> > > vm = xe_vm_create(xe, flags, xef);
> > > if (IS_ERR(vm))
> > > @@ -2903,7 +2910,7 @@ static int vma_lock_and_validate(struct
> > > drm_exec *exec, struct xe_vma *vma,
> > > err = drm_exec_lock_obj(exec, &bo-
> > > >ttm.base);
> > > if (!err && validate)
> > > err = xe_bo_validate(bo, vm,
> > > -
> > > !xe_vm_in_preempt_fence_mode(vm) &&
> > > +
> > > xe_vm_allow_vm_eviction(vm) &&
> >
> > One question. This is existing code but can you refresh my memory why
> > we
> > allow overcommit on dma-fencing VMs? Wouldn't the next exec IOCTL
> > immediately fail?
>
> Yes, but mesa can handle that by user-space eviction. In practice IIRC
> they unbind everything and re-bind on demand. No care for performance.
>
Right, no I recall the background.
This patch LGTM:
Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> For preempt-fence mode we have the dreaded oom-in-the-rebind-worker
> which we still haven't fixed with a UMD notification, so we're forced
> to avoid that if at all possible.
>
> /Thomas
>
>
> >
> > Matt
> >
> > > res_evict, exec);
> > > }
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.h
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.h
> > > index 288115c7844a..f849e369432b 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.h
> > > @@ -220,6 +220,13 @@ static inline bool
> > > xe_vm_in_preempt_fence_mode(struct xe_vm *vm)
> > > return xe_vm_in_lr_mode(vm) && !xe_vm_in_fault_mode(vm);
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static inline bool xe_vm_allow_vm_eviction(struct xe_vm *vm)
> > > +{
> > > + return !xe_vm_in_lr_mode(vm) ||
> > > + (xe_vm_in_fault_mode(vm) &&
> > > + !(vm->flags & XE_VM_FLAG_NO_VM_OVERCOMMIT));
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > int xe_vm_add_compute_exec_queue(struct xe_vm *vm, struct
> > > xe_exec_queue *q);
> > > void xe_vm_remove_compute_exec_queue(struct xe_vm *vm, struct
> > > xe_exec_queue *q);
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_types.h
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_types.h
> > > index 43203e90ee3e..1f6f7e30e751 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_types.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_types.h
> > > @@ -232,6 +232,7 @@ struct xe_vm {
> > > #define XE_VM_FLAG_TILE_ID(flags) FIELD_GET(GENMASK(7, 6),
> > > flags)
> > > #define XE_VM_FLAG_SET_TILE_ID(tile) FIELD_PREP(GENMASK(7, 6),
> > > (tile)->id)
> > > #define XE_VM_FLAG_GSC BIT(8)
> > > +#define XE_VM_FLAG_NO_VM_OVERCOMMIT BIT(9)
> > > unsigned long flags;
> > >
> > > /**
> > > diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h
> > > index 077e66a682e2..e54f8e12acd9 100644
> > > --- a/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h
> > > +++ b/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h
> > > @@ -975,6 +975,11 @@ struct drm_xe_gem_mmap_offset {
> > > * demand when accessed, and also allows per-VM overcommit of
> > > memory.
> > > * The xe driver internally uses recoverable pagefaults to
> > > implement
> > > * this.
> > > + * - %DRM_XE_VM_CREATE_FLAG_NO_VM_OVERCOMMIT - Requires also
> > > + * DRM_XE_VM_CREATE_FLAG_FAULT_MODE. This disallows per-VM
> > > overcommit
> > > + * but only during a &DRM_IOCTL_XE_VM_BIND operation with the
> > > + * %DRM_XE_VM_BIND_FLAG_IMMEDIATE flag set. This may be useful
> > > for
> > > + * user-space naively probing the amount of available memory.
> > > */
> > > struct drm_xe_vm_create {
> > > /** @extensions: Pointer to the first extension struct, if
> > > any */
> > > @@ -983,6 +988,7 @@ struct drm_xe_vm_create {
> > > #define DRM_XE_VM_CREATE_FLAG_SCRATCH_PAGE (1 << 0)
> > > #define DRM_XE_VM_CREATE_FLAG_LR_MODE (1 << 1)
> > > #define DRM_XE_VM_CREATE_FLAG_FAULT_MODE (1 << 2)
> > > +#define DRM_XE_VM_CREATE_FLAG_NO_VM_OVERCOMMIT (1 << 3)
> > > /** @flags: Flags */
> > > __u32 flags;
> > >
> > > --
> > > 2.52.0
> > >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-05 17:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-04 15:33 [PATCH] drm/xe/uapi: Introduce a flag to disallow vm overcommit in fault mode Thomas Hellström
2026-02-04 18:56 ` Matthew Brost
2026-02-05 8:06 ` Thomas Hellström
2026-02-05 17:58 ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2026-02-05 0:50 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for " Patchwork
2026-02-05 1:23 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-02-05 16:14 ` ✓ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aYTaTTm+iaj2VfQt@lstrano-desk.jf.intel.com \
--to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=john.falkowski@intel.com \
--cc=michal.mrozek@intel.com \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox