From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: Shuicheng Lin <shuicheng.lin@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/xe/sync: Fix user fence leak on alloc failure
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2026 19:00:50 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aZZ84pd1PREju2n5@lstrano-desk.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260219014216.2893391-2-shuicheng.lin@intel.com>
On Thu, Feb 19, 2026 at 01:42:17AM +0000, Shuicheng Lin wrote:
> When dma_fence_chain_alloc() fails, properly release the user fence
> reference to prevent a memory leak.
>
> The error cleanup path in callers (xe_exec.c, xe_oa.c, xe_vm.c) uses a
> while loop that cleans up syncs from index 0 to num_syncs-1. The failed
> sync at the current index num_syncs is not covered by this loop, so the
> local user_fence_put() is necessary to prevent a leak.
> Set sync->ufence = NULL after the user_fence_put() call to avoid if the
> caller later calls xe_sync_entry_cleanup() on the failed sync, it will
> trigger another user_fence_put() on the already-freed memory, causing
> a use-after-free bug.
>
> Also remove extra whitespace in function call and comment.
>
> Fixes: adda4e855ab6 ("drm/xe: Enforce correct user fence signaling order using")
> Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Shuicheng Lin <shuicheng.lin@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sync.c | 9 ++++++---
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sync.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sync.c
> index c8fdcdbd6ae7..c5f71067fcd2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sync.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sync.c
> @@ -200,8 +200,11 @@ int xe_sync_entry_parse(struct xe_device *xe, struct xe_file *xef,
> if (XE_IOCTL_DBG(xe, IS_ERR(sync->ufence)))
> return PTR_ERR(sync->ufence);
> sync->ufence_chain_fence = dma_fence_chain_alloc();
> - if (!sync->ufence_chain_fence)
> + if (!sync->ufence_chain_fence) {
> + user_fence_put(sync->ufence);
> + sync->ufence = NULL;
> return -ENOMEM;
So there are multiple problems in DRM_XE_SYNC_TYPE_SYNCOBJ,
DRM_XE_SYNC_TYPE_TIMELINE_SYNCOBJ case statements too. e.g., after
drm_syncobj_find is called, we can fail but the reference isn't dropped
to the syncobj.
With above, would it be better if the callers called
xe_sync_entry_cleanup on the current sync even if xe_sync_entry_parse
fails? Or another option is change xe_sync_entry_parse to call
xe_sync_entry_cleanup internally on failure points after any internl
state is setup?
> + }
> sync->ufence_syncobj = ufence_syncobj;
> }
>
> @@ -222,7 +225,7 @@ ALLOW_ERROR_INJECTION(xe_sync_entry_parse, ERRNO);
> int xe_sync_entry_add_deps(struct xe_sync_entry *sync, struct xe_sched_job *job)
> {
> if (sync->fence)
> - return drm_sched_job_add_dependency(&job->drm,
> + return drm_sched_job_add_dependency(&job->drm,
> dma_fence_get(sync->fence));
>
> return 0;
> @@ -311,7 +314,7 @@ void xe_sync_entry_cleanup(struct xe_sync_entry *sync)
> *
> * Get a fence from syncs, exec queue, and VM. If syncs contain in-fences create
> * and return a composite fence of all in-fences + last fence. If no in-fences
> - * return last fence on input exec queue. Caller must drop reference to
> + * return last fence on input exec queue. Caller must drop reference to
Keep whitespace changes in a seperate patch please.
Matt
> * returned fence.
> *
> * Return: fence on success, ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM) on failure
> --
> 2.50.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-19 3:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-19 1:42 [PATCH] drm/xe/sync: Fix user fence leak on alloc failure Shuicheng Lin
2026-02-19 2:03 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for " Patchwork
2026-02-19 2:38 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-02-19 3:00 ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2026-02-19 21:32 ` [PATCH] " Lin, Shuicheng
2026-02-19 3:37 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure for " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aZZ84pd1PREju2n5@lstrano-desk.jf.intel.com \
--to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=shuicheng.lin@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox