From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: Satyanarayana K V P <satyanarayana.k.v.p@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org,
"Michal Wajdeczko" <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>,
"Rodrigo Vivi" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
"Piotr Piórkowski" <piotr.piorkowski@intel.com>,
"Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
"Michał Winiarski" <michal.winiarski@intel.com>,
"Dunajski Bartosz" <bartosz.dunajski@intel.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v4 1/1] drm/xe/pf: Restrict device query responses in admin-only PF mode
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2026 10:54:31 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aaCW59fWwXcskx6n@lstrano-desk.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aaCVXnUYdsQwlSx1@lstrano-desk.jf.intel.com>
On Thu, Feb 26, 2026 at 10:47:58AM -0800, Matthew Brost wrote:
One more thing...
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2026 at 04:31:06PM +0000, Satyanarayana K V P wrote:
> > When the PF is configured for admin‑only mode, it is restricted to
> > management functions and should not allow users to run workloads.
> > Suppress device capabilities to userspace in admin-only PF mode.
> >
>
> I'd mention which IOCTLs we expose in PF admin only and why we expose
> each one of these IOCTLs.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Satyanarayana K V P <satyanarayana.k.v.p@intel.com>
> > Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
> > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> > Cc: Piotr Piórkowski <piotr.piorkowski@intel.com>
> > Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> > Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
> > Cc: Dunajski Bartosz <bartosz.dunajski@intel.com>
> > Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> >
> > ---
> > V3 -> V4:
> > - Suppressed device capabilities in admin-only PF mode. (Wajdeczko)
> >
> > V2 -> V3:
> > - Introduced new helper function xe_debugfs_create_files() to create
> > debugfs entries based on admin_only_pf mode or normal mode.
> >
> > V1 -> V2:
> > - Rebased to latest drm-tip.
> > - Update update_minor_dev() to debugfs_minor_dev().
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_query.c | 11 ++++++++++-
> > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov.h | 8 ++++++++
> > 3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> > index 3462645ca13c..7bf462eed917 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> > @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
> > #include "regs/xe_regs.h"
> > #include "xe_bo.h"
> > #include "xe_bo_evict.h"
> > +#include "xe_configfs.h"
> > #include "xe_debugfs.h"
> > #include "xe_defaults.h"
> > #include "xe_devcoredump.h"
> > @@ -213,6 +214,11 @@ static const struct drm_ioctl_desc xe_ioctls[] = {
> > DRM_RENDER_ALLOW),
> > };
> >
> > +static const struct drm_ioctl_desc xe_pf_admin_only_ioctls[] = {
> > + DRM_IOCTL_DEF_DRV(XE_DEVICE_QUERY, xe_query_ioctl, DRM_RENDER_ALLOW),
> > + DRM_IOCTL_DEF_DRV(XE_OBSERVATION, xe_observation_ioctl, DRM_RENDER_ALLOW),
>
> XE_OBSERVATION can create buffer objects and exec queues? Is desired to
> expose things like this?
>
> I like this approach of only exposing a subset of IOCTLs though, pretty slick.
>
> > +};
> > +
> > static long xe_drm_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
> > {
> > struct drm_file *file_priv = file->private_data;
> > @@ -442,6 +448,14 @@ struct xe_device *xe_device_create(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> > struct xe_device *xe;
> > int err;
> >
> > + if (xe_configfs_admin_only_pf(pdev)) {
> > + driver.ioctls = xe_pf_admin_only_ioctls;
> > + driver.num_ioctls = ARRAY_SIZE(xe_pf_admin_only_ioctls);
> > + } else {
While harmless, you don't need the else clause as these are default values.
Matt
>
> + driver.ioctls = xe_ioctls;
> > + driver.num_ioctls = ARRAY_SIZE(xe_ioctls);
> > + }
> > +
> > xe_display_driver_set_hooks(&driver);
> >
> > err = aperture_remove_conflicting_pci_devices(pdev, driver.name);
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_query.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_query.c
> > index 34db266b723f..1416ab7be809 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_query.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_query.c
> > @@ -215,7 +215,10 @@ static int query_engines(struct xe_device *xe,
> > i++;
> > }
> >
> > - engines->num_engines = i;
> > + if (xe_device_is_admin_only(xe))
> > + engines->num_engines = 0;
> > + else
> > + engines->num_engines = i;
> >
> > if (copy_to_user(query_ptr, engines, size)) {
> > kfree(engines);
> > @@ -297,6 +300,9 @@ static int query_mem_regions(struct xe_device *xe,
> > }
> > }
> >
> > + if (xe_device_is_admin_only(xe))
> > + mem_regions->num_mem_regions = 0;
> > +
> > if (!copy_to_user(query_ptr, mem_regions, size))
> > ret = 0;
> > else
> > @@ -419,6 +425,9 @@ static int query_gt_list(struct xe_device *xe, struct drm_xe_device_query *query
> > iter++;
> > }
> >
> > + if (xe_device_is_admin_only(xe))
> > + gt_list->num_gt = 0;
> > +
> > if (copy_to_user(query_ptr, gt_list, size)) {
> > kfree(gt_list);
> > return -EFAULT;
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov.h
> > index 72e55543c30e..be426afa90b1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov.h
> > @@ -37,6 +37,14 @@ static inline bool xe_device_is_sriov_vf(const struct xe_device *xe)
> > return xe_device_sriov_mode(xe) == XE_SRIOV_MODE_VF;
> > }
> >
> > +static inline bool xe_device_is_admin_only(const struct xe_device *xe)
>
> Kernel doc.
>
> Matt
>
> > +{
> > + if (xe_device_is_sriov_pf(xe) && xe->sriov.pf.admin_only)
> > + return true;
> > + else
> > + return false;
> > +}
> > +
> > #define IS_SRIOV_PF(xe) xe_device_is_sriov_pf(xe)
> > #define IS_SRIOV_VF(xe) xe_device_is_sriov_vf(xe)
> >
> > --
> > 2.43.0
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-26 18:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-26 16:31 [RFC v4 0/1] Do not create drm device for PF only admin mode Satyanarayana K V P
2026-02-26 16:31 ` [RFC v4 1/1] drm/xe/pf: Restrict device query responses in admin-only PF mode Satyanarayana K V P
2026-02-26 18:47 ` Matthew Brost
2026-02-26 18:54 ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2026-02-26 21:32 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2026-02-26 16:38 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for Do not create drm device for PF only admin mode (rev3) Patchwork
2026-02-26 17:18 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-02-26 18:44 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aaCW59fWwXcskx6n@lstrano-desk.jf.intel.com \
--to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=bartosz.dunajski@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
--cc=michal.winiarski@intel.com \
--cc=piotr.piorkowski@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=satyanarayana.k.v.p@intel.com \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox