From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Badal Nilawar <badal.nilawar@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>, <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>,
<alexander.usyskin@intel.com>, <michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>,
<daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] drm/xe/xe_late_bind_fw: Refactor pm flow
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2026 09:20:25 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aamRKQBSGjoBIdMq@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260305104441.2857181-7-badal.nilawar@intel.com>
On Thu, Mar 05, 2026 at 04:14:42PM +0530, Badal Nilawar wrote:
> Refactor late binding flow across suspend/resume by adding dedicated
> pm functions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Badal Nilawar <badal.nilawar@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_late_bind_fw.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++-------
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_late_bind_fw.h | 4 ++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.c | 6 +++---
> 3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_late_bind_fw.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_late_bind_fw.c
> index 768442ca7da6d..5ca25186dc0cc 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_late_bind_fw.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_late_bind_fw.c
> @@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ static int xe_late_bind_fw_num_fans(struct xe_late_bind *late_bind, u32 *num_fan
> PCODE_MBOX(FAN_SPEED_CONTROL, FSC_READ_NUM_FANS, 0), num_fans, NULL);
> }
>
> -void xe_late_bind_wait_for_worker_completion(struct xe_late_bind *late_bind)
> +static void xe_late_bind_wait_for_worker_completion(struct xe_late_bind *late_bind)
since it is now static, you can perhaps remove entirely the
prefix 'xe_late_bind_' to make it shorter.
I prefer without it but I don't believe it hurts to keep it. Up to you:
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> {
> struct xe_device *xe = late_bind_to_xe(late_bind);
> struct xe_late_bind_fw *lbfw;
> @@ -269,18 +269,12 @@ static void xe_late_bind_work(struct work_struct *work)
> xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);
> }
>
> -int xe_late_bind_fw_load(struct xe_late_bind *late_bind)
> +static int xe_late_bind_fw_load(struct xe_late_bind *late_bind)
> {
> struct xe_device *xe = late_bind_to_xe(late_bind);
> struct xe_late_bind_fw *lbfw;
> int fw_id;
>
> - if (!late_bind->component_added)
> - return -ENODEV;
> -
> - if (late_bind->disable)
> - return 0;
> -
> for (fw_id = 0; fw_id < XE_LB_FW_MAX_ID; fw_id++) {
> lbfw = &late_bind->late_bind_fw[fw_id];
> if (lbfw->payload) {
> @@ -424,6 +418,28 @@ static void xe_late_bind_remove(void *arg)
> }
> }
>
> +void xe_late_bind_pm_suspend(struct xe_late_bind *late_bind)
> +{
> + if (!late_bind->component_added)
> + return;
> +
> + if (late_bind->disable)
> + return;
> +
> + xe_late_bind_wait_for_worker_completion(late_bind);
> +}
> +
> +void xe_late_bind_pm_resume(struct xe_late_bind *late_bind)
> +{
> + if (!late_bind->component_added)
> + return;
> +
> + if (late_bind->disable)
> + return;
> +
> + xe_late_bind_fw_load(late_bind);
> +}
> +
> /**
> * xe_late_bind_init() - add xe mei late binding component
> * @late_bind: pointer to late bind structure.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_late_bind_fw.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_late_bind_fw.h
> index 07e4373905395..8896fea3068e5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_late_bind_fw.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_late_bind_fw.h
> @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
> struct xe_late_bind;
>
> int xe_late_bind_init(struct xe_late_bind *late_bind);
> -int xe_late_bind_fw_load(struct xe_late_bind *late_bind);
> -void xe_late_bind_wait_for_worker_completion(struct xe_late_bind *late_bind);
> +void xe_late_bind_pm_suspend(struct xe_late_bind *late_bind);
> +void xe_late_bind_pm_resume(struct xe_late_bind *late_bind);
>
> #endif
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.c
> index 01185f10a8835..f85b12c1a85d2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.c
> @@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ int xe_pm_suspend(struct xe_device *xe)
> if (err)
> goto err;
>
> - xe_late_bind_wait_for_worker_completion(&xe->late_bind);
> + xe_late_bind_pm_suspend(&xe->late_bind);
>
> for_each_gt(gt, xe, id)
> xe_gt_suspend_prepare(gt);
> @@ -284,7 +284,7 @@ int xe_pm_resume(struct xe_device *xe)
> if (IS_VF_CCS_READY(xe))
> xe_sriov_vf_ccs_register_context(xe);
>
> - xe_late_bind_fw_load(&xe->late_bind);
> + xe_late_bind_pm_resume(&xe->late_bind);
>
> drm_dbg(&xe->drm, "Device resumed\n");
> xe_pm_block_end_signalling();
> @@ -698,7 +698,7 @@ int xe_pm_runtime_resume(struct xe_device *xe)
> xe_sriov_vf_ccs_register_context(xe);
>
> if (xe->d3cold.allowed)
> - xe_late_bind_fw_load(&xe->late_bind);
> + xe_late_bind_pm_resume(&xe->late_bind);
>
> out:
> xe_rpm_lockmap_release(xe);
> --
> 2.52.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-05 14:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-05 10:44 [RFC PATCH 0/4] Add ocode late binding support for CRI Badal Nilawar
2026-03-05 10:44 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] drm/xe/xe_late_bind_fw: Refactor pm flow Badal Nilawar
2026-03-05 14:20 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2026-03-05 10:44 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] drm/xe/xe_late_bind_fw: Add support to load Ocode firmware on CRI Badal Nilawar
2026-03-05 23:38 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2026-03-05 10:44 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] drm/xe/xe_late_bind_fw: Track firmware load status Badal Nilawar
2026-03-05 23:52 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2026-03-05 10:44 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] drm/xe/xe_late_bind_fw: Enable late binding support for CRI Badal Nilawar
2026-03-06 11:26 ` ✗ CI.KUnit: failure for Add ocode " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aamRKQBSGjoBIdMq@intel.com \
--to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.usyskin@intel.com \
--cc=anshuman.gupta@intel.com \
--cc=badal.nilawar@intel.com \
--cc=daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=michael.j.ruhl@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox