From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: "Summers, Stuart" <stuart.summers@intel.com>
Cc: "intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/xe: Skip media GT TLB invalidation when VM has no queues mapped
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2026 09:17:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <acFnkD6HZV4r/8o6@lstrano-desk.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7f334028a55504b5f75f2fddd555a65107de2a49.camel@intel.com>
On Mon, Mar 23, 2026 at 10:13:28AM -0600, Summers, Stuart wrote:
> On Wed, 2026-03-04 at 15:37 -0800, Matthew Brost wrote:
> > If no exec queues from a VM are mapped on the media GT, issuing a
> > PPGTT TLB invalidation for that GT requires an rc6 wake which is
> > expensive.
> >
> > Skip the media GT TLB invalidation when the VM has no exec queues
> > mapped on it. If TLB invalidations are already in-flight on that GT
> > we can't break fence ordering, so issue a dummy GGTT invalidation
> > instead to maintain seqno ordering.
> >
> > This optimization is particularly impactful for SVM workloads which
> > may or may not use the media GT. Average TLB invalidation time drops
> > from ~75us to ~18us in such benchmarks.
>
> So.. what if the user creates the VM, binds it, and only then creates
> an exec queue and submits?
>
I would think the TLBs would be empty but something is clearly wrong in
patch per CI and perhaps this is the problem. Need to dig into failures
this week.
Matt
> -Stuart
>
> >
> > Assisted-by: GitHub Copilot:claude-sonnet-4.6 # Documentation only.
> > Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_tlb_inval.c | 43
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_tlb_inval.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_tlb_inval.c
> > index ced58f46f846..20c34469d9a5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_tlb_inval.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_tlb_inval.c
> > @@ -205,14 +205,53 @@ static int send_tlb_inval_asid_ppgtt(struct
> > xe_tlb_inval *tlb_inval, u32 seqno,
> > struct drm_suballoc *prl_sa)
> > {
> > struct xe_guc *guc = tlb_inval->private;
> > + struct xe_device *xe = guc_to_xe(guc);
> > + struct xe_gt *gt = guc_to_gt(guc);
> > + struct xe_vm *vm;
> > + int err = 0, id = guc_to_gt(guc)->info.id;
> >
> > lockdep_assert_held(&tlb_inval->seqno_lock);
> >
> > if (guc_to_xe(guc)->info.force_execlist)
> > return -ECANCELED;
> >
> > - return send_tlb_inval_ppgtt(guc, seqno, start, end, asid,
> > - XE_GUC_TLB_INVAL_PAGE_SELECTIVE,
> > prl_sa);
> > + if (!xe_gt_is_media_type(gt))
> > + return send_tlb_inval_ppgtt(guc, seqno, start, end,
> > asid,
> > +
> > XE_GUC_TLB_INVAL_PAGE_SELECTIVE,
> > + prl_sa);
> > +
> > + /* Try to skip media GT TLB invalidations */
> > +
> > + vm = xe_device_asid_to_vm(xe, asid);
> > + if (IS_ERR(vm))
> > + return PTR_ERR(vm);
> > +
> > + down_read(&vm->exec_queues.lock);
> > +
> > + if (!vm->exec_queues.count[id]) {
> > + /*
> > + * We can't break fence ordering for TLB invalidation
> > jobs, if
> > + * TLB invalidations are inflight issue a dummy
> > invalidation to
> > + * maintain ordering. Nor can we move safely the
> > seqno_recv when
> > + * returning -ECANCELED if TLB invalidations are in
> > flight. Use
> > + * GGTT invalidation as dummy invalidation given ASID
> > + * invalidations are unsupported here.
> > + */
> > + if (xe_tlb_inval_idle(tlb_inval))
> > + err = -ECANCELED;
> > + else
> > + err = send_tlb_inval_ggtt(tlb_inval, seqno);
> > + goto err_unlock;
> > + }
> > +
> > + err = send_tlb_inval_ppgtt(guc, seqno, start, end, asid,
> > + XE_GUC_TLB_INVAL_PAGE_SELECTIVE,
> > prl_sa);
> > +
> > +err_unlock:
> > + up_read(&vm->exec_queues.lock);
> > + xe_vm_put(vm);
> > +
> > + return err;
> > }
> >
> > static int send_tlb_inval_ctx_ppgtt(struct xe_tlb_inval *tlb_inval,
> > u32 seqno,
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-23 16:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-04 23:37 [PATCH] drm/xe: Skip media GT TLB invalidation when VM has no queues mapped Matthew Brost
2026-03-05 22:47 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for " Patchwork
2026-03-05 22:48 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-03-06 0:19 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-03-06 18:07 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
2026-03-20 13:06 ` [PATCH] " Thomas Hellström
2026-03-23 7:00 ` Matthew Brost
2026-03-23 16:13 ` Summers, Stuart
2026-03-23 16:17 ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2026-03-23 16:26 ` Summers, Stuart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=acFnkD6HZV4r/8o6@lstrano-desk.jf.intel.com \
--to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=stuart.summers@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox