public inbox for intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>
To: "Mallesh, Koujalagi" <mallesh.koujalagi@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, matthew.brost@intel.com,
	rodrigo.vivi@intel.com, michal.wajdeczko@intel.com,
	matthew.d.roper@intel.com, umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com,
	soham.purkait@intel.com, anoop.c.vijay@intel.com,
	aravind.iddamsetty@linux.intel.com,
	Riana Tauro <riana.tauro@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] drm/xe/ras: Introduce correctable error handling
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2026 05:43:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <acIWhfiaL3nLZ6Ic@black.igk.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <760c7a68-2755-449a-b1ca-8e9ef3bd9886@intel.com>

On Mon, Mar 23, 2026 at 08:16:23PM +0530, Mallesh, Koujalagi wrote:
> On 23-03-2026 05:15 pm, Raag Jadav wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 19, 2026 at 07:30:06PM +0530, Tauro, Riana wrote:
> > > On 3/12/2026 2:36 PM, Raag Jadav wrote:
> > > > Add initial support for correctable error handling which is serviced
> > > > using system controller event. Currently we only log the errors in
> > > > dmesg but this serves as a foundation for RAS infrastructure and will
> > > > be further extended to facilitate other RAS features.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >    drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile           |  1 +
> > > >    drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ras.c           | 89 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > >    drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ras.h           | 14 +++++
> > > >    drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ras_types.h     | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > >    drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sysctrl_event.c |  3 +-
> > > >    5 files changed, 179 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >    create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ras.c
> > > >    create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ras.h
> > > >    create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ras_types.h
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile
> > > > index 373adb20afb2..9811cf732260 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile
> > > > @@ -113,6 +113,7 @@ xe-y += xe_bb.o \
> > > >    	xe_pxp_submit.o \
> > > >    	xe_query.o \
> > > >    	xe_range_fence.o \
> > > > +	xe_ras.o \
> > > >    	xe_reg_sr.o \
> > > >    	xe_reg_whitelist.o \
> > > >    	xe_ring_ops.o \
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ras.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ras.c
> > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > index 000000000000..37a996a6abf8
> > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ras.c
> > > > @@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
> > > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
> > > > +/*
> > > > + * Copyright © 2026 Intel Corporation
> > > > + */
> > > > +
> > > > +#include "xe_assert.h"
> > > > +#include "xe_printk.h"
> > > > +#include "xe_ras.h"
> > > > +#include "xe_ras_types.h"
> > > > +#include "xe_sysctrl.h"
> > > > +#include "xe_sysctrl_event_types.h"
> > > > +
> > > > +/* Severity of detected errors  */
> > > > +enum xe_ras_severity {
> > > > +	XE_RAS_SEV_NOT_SUPPORTED = 0,
> > > > +	XE_RAS_SEV_CORRECTABLE,
> > > > +	XE_RAS_SEV_UNCORRECTABLE,
> > > > +	XE_RAS_SEV_INFORMATIONAL,
> > > > +	XE_RAS_SEV_MAX
> > > > +};
> > > > +
> > > > +/* Major IP blocks/components where errors can originate */
> > > > +enum xe_ras_component {
> > > > +	XE_RAS_COMP_NOT_SUPPORTED = 0,
> > > > +	XE_RAS_COMP_DEVICE_MEMORY,
> > > > +	XE_RAS_COMP_CORE_COMPUTE,
> > > > +	XE_RAS_COMP_RESERVED,
> > > > +	XE_RAS_COMP_PCIE,
> > > > +	XE_RAS_COMP_FABRIC,
> > > > +	XE_RAS_COMP_SOC_INTERNAL,
> > > > +	XE_RAS_COMP_MAX
> > > > +};
> > > > +
> > > > +static const char *const xe_ras_severities[] = {
> > > > +	[XE_RAS_SEV_NOT_SUPPORTED]		= "Not Supported",
> > > > +	[XE_RAS_SEV_CORRECTABLE]		= "Correctable",
> > > > +	[XE_RAS_SEV_UNCORRECTABLE]		= "Uncorrectable",
> > > > +	[XE_RAS_SEV_INFORMATIONAL]		= "Informational",
> > > > +};
> > > > +static_assert(ARRAY_SIZE(xe_ras_severities) == XE_RAS_SEV_MAX);
> > > > +
> > > > +static const char *const xe_ras_components[] = {
> > > > +	[XE_RAS_COMP_NOT_SUPPORTED]		= "Not Supported",
> > > > +	[XE_RAS_COMP_DEVICE_MEMORY]		= "Device Memory",
> > > > +	[XE_RAS_COMP_CORE_COMPUTE]		= "Core Compute",
> > > > +	[XE_RAS_COMP_RESERVED]			= "Reserved",
> > > > +	[XE_RAS_COMP_PCIE]			= "PCIe",
> > > > +	[XE_RAS_COMP_FABRIC]			= "Fabric",
> > > > +	[XE_RAS_COMP_SOC_INTERNAL]		= "SoC Internal",
> > > > +};
> > > > +static_assert(ARRAY_SIZE(xe_ras_components) == XE_RAS_COMP_MAX);
> > > > +
> > > > +static inline const char *sev_to_str(struct xe_device *xe, u32 sev)
> > > > +{
> > > > +	xe_assert(xe, sev < XE_RAS_SEV_MAX);
> > > > +
> > > > +	return sev < XE_RAS_SEV_MAX ? xe_ras_severities[sev] : "Unknown";
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static inline const char *comp_to_str(struct xe_device *xe, u32 comp)
> > > > +{
> > > > +	xe_assert(xe, comp < XE_RAS_COMP_MAX);
> > > > +
> > > > +	return comp < XE_RAS_COMP_MAX ? xe_ras_components[comp] : "Unknown";
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +void xe_ras_event_log(struct xe_sysctrl *sc, struct xe_sysctrl_event_response *response)
> > > > +{
> > > > +	struct xe_ras_event_threshold_crossed *pending = (void *)&response->data;
> > > > +	struct xe_ras_error *errors = pending->counters;
> > > > +	struct xe_device *xe = sc_to_xe(sc);
> > > > +	u32 cid, sev, comp, inst, cause;
> > > > +	u8 tile;
> > > > +
> > > > +	xe_assert(xe, pending->ncounters < XE_RAS_NUM_COUNTERS);
> > > > +	xe_warn(xe, "[RAS]: threshold crossed, %u new errors\n", pending->ncounters);
> > > > +
> > > > +	for (cid = 0; cid < pending->ncounters && cid < XE_RAS_NUM_COUNTERS; cid++) {
> > > > +		sev = errors[cid].common.severity;
> > > > +		comp = errors[cid].common.component;
> > > > +
> > > > +		tile = errors[cid].product.unit.tile;
> > > > +		inst = errors[cid].product.unit.instance;
> > > > +		cause = errors[cid].product.cause.cause;
> > > > +
> > > > +		xe_warn(xe, "[RAS]: Tile:%u Instance:%u Component:%s Error:%s Cause:%#x\n",
> > > > +			tile, inst, comp_to_str(xe, sev), sev_to_str(xe, comp), cause);
> 
> Please fix Severity/Component Parameter Swap.

Yep, missed it.

Raag

> > > We can have minimal logging here with only severity and component and add
> > > additional logging
> > > 
> > > in following patches.
> > I plan to remove it entirely once we have cper in place, but until that
> > happens (and given the fragility of things) it'll good for debugging.
> > 
> > > > +	}
> > > > +}
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ras.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ras.h
> > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > index 000000000000..22f035fa498d
> > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ras.h
> > > > @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
> > > > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT */
> > > > +/*
> > > > + * Copyright © 2026 Intel Corporation
> > > > + */
> > > > +
> > > > +#ifndef _XE_RAS_H_
> > > > +#define _XE_RAS_H_
> > > > +
> > > > +struct xe_sysctrl;
> > > > +struct xe_sysctrl_event_response;
> > > > +
> > > > +void xe_ras_event_log(struct xe_sysctrl *sc, struct xe_sysctrl_event_response *response);
> > > > +
> > > > +#endif
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ras_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ras_types.h
> > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > index 000000000000..2982c4696b6d
> > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ras_types.h
> > > > @@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
> > > > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT */
> > > > +/*
> > > > + * Copyright © 2026 Intel Corporation
> > > > + */
> > > > +
> > > > +#ifndef _XE_RAS_TYPES_H_
> > > > +#define _XE_RAS_TYPES_H_
> > > > +
> > > > +#include <linux/types.h>
> > > > +
> > > > +#define XE_RAS_NUM_COUNTERS			16
> > > > +
> > > > +/**
> > > > + * struct xe_ras_error_common - Error fields that are common across all products
> > > > + */
> > > > +struct xe_ras_error_common {
> > > > +	/** @severity: Error severity */
> > > > +	u8 severity;
> > > > +	/** @component: IP block where error originated */
> > > > +	u8 component;
> > > > +} __packed;
> > > > +
> > > > +/**
> > > > + * struct xe_ras_error_unit - Error unit information
> > > > + */
> > > > +struct xe_ras_error_unit {
> > > > +	/** @tile: Tile identifier */
> > > > +	u8 tile;
> > > > +	/** @instance: Instance identifier specific to IP */
> > > > +	u32 instance;
> > > > +} __packed;
> > > > +
> > > > +/**
> > > > + * struct xe_ras_error_cause - Error cause information
> > > > + */
> > > > +struct xe_ras_error_cause {
> > > > +	/** @cause: Cause/checker */
> > > > +	u32 cause;
> > > > +	/** @reserved: For future use */
> > > > +	u8 reserved;
> > > > +} __packed;
> > > > +
> > > > +/**
> > > > + * struct xe_ras_error_product - Error fields that are specific to the product
> > > > + */
> > > > +struct xe_ras_error_product {
> > > > +	/** @unit: Unit within IP block */
> > > > +	struct xe_ras_error_unit unit;
> > > > +	/** @cause: Cause/checker */
> > > > +	struct xe_ras_error_cause cause;
> > > > +} __packed;
> > > > +
> > > > +/**
> > > > + * struct xe_ras_error - Combines common and product-specific parts
> > > > + */
> > > > +struct xe_ras_error {
> > > error_class ?
> > I know that how it's in the spec, but it's full of needless verbiage that
> > doesn't add much to the meaning. I'm fine either way.
> > 
> > Raag
> > 
> > > > +	/** @common: Common error type and component */
> > > > +	struct xe_ras_error_common common;
> > > > +	/** @product: Product-specific unit and cause */
> > > > +	struct xe_ras_error_product product;
> > > > +} __packed;
> > > > +
> > > > +/**
> > > > + * struct xe_ras_event_threshold_crossed - Event data for threshold crossed event
> > > > + */
> > > > +struct xe_ras_event_threshold_crossed {
> > > > +	/** @ncounters: Number of error counters that crossed thresholds */
> > > > +	u32 ncounters;
> > > > +	/** @counters: Array of error counters that crossed threshold */
> > > > +	struct xe_ras_error counters[XE_RAS_NUM_COUNTERS];
> > > > +} __packed;
> > > > +
> > > > +#endif
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sysctrl_event.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sysctrl_event.c
> > > > index 47afca586bd1..1833ecadd9a1 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sysctrl_event.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sysctrl_event.c
> > > > @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
> > > >    #include "xe_device.h"
> > > >    #include "xe_irq.h"
> > > >    #include "xe_printk.h"
> > > > +#include "xe_ras.h"
> > > >    #include "xe_sysctrl.h"
> > > >    #include "xe_sysctrl_event_types.h"
> > > >    #include "xe_sysctrl_mailbox.h"
> > > > @@ -38,7 +39,7 @@ static void xe_sysctrl_get_pending_event(struct xe_sysctrl *sc,
> > > >    		}
> > > >    		if (response.event == XE_SYSCTRL_EVENT_THRESHOLD_CROSSED) {
> > > > -			xe_warn(xe, "[RAS]: error counter threshold crossed\n");
> > > > +			xe_ras_event_log(sc, &response);
> > > >    		} else {
> > > >    			xe_err(xe, "sysctrl: unexpected event %#x\n", response.event);
> > > >    			return;

  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-24  4:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-12  9:06 [PATCH v3 0/4] Introduce Xe Correctable Error Handling Raag Jadav
2026-03-12  9:06 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] drm/xe/sysctrl: Add System Controller Raag Jadav
2026-03-12  9:06 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] drm/xe/sysctrl: Add system controller interrupt handler Raag Jadav
2026-03-17  5:47   ` Mallesh, Koujalagi
2026-03-23 11:32     ` Raag Jadav
2026-03-12  9:06 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] drm/xe/sysctrl: Add system controller event support Raag Jadav
2026-03-19 14:09   ` Tauro, Riana
2026-03-23 11:40     ` Raag Jadav
2026-03-23 12:27       ` Mallesh, Koujalagi
2026-03-24  4:42         ` Raag Jadav
2026-03-12  9:06 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] drm/xe/ras: Introduce correctable error handling Raag Jadav
2026-03-19 14:00   ` Tauro, Riana
2026-03-23 11:45     ` Raag Jadav
2026-03-23 14:46       ` Mallesh, Koujalagi
2026-03-24  4:43         ` Raag Jadav [this message]
2026-03-12 10:27 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Introduce Xe Correctable Error Handling (rev3) Patchwork
2026-03-12 10:28 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-03-12 11:15 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-03-13  6:22 ` ✓ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=acIWhfiaL3nLZ6Ic@black.igk.intel.com \
    --to=raag.jadav@intel.com \
    --cc=anoop.c.vijay@intel.com \
    --cc=aravind.iddamsetty@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=mallesh.koujalagi@intel.com \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
    --cc=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
    --cc=riana.tauro@intel.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=soham.purkait@intel.com \
    --cc=umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox