public inbox for intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: <fei.yang@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Stuart Summers <stuart.summers@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/xe: Wait for HW clearance before issuing the next TLB inval.
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2026 11:59:18 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <adQChk1p9hRnvQxl@gsse-cloud1.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260404062250.3435419-1-fei.yang@intel.com>

On Fri, Apr 03, 2026 at 11:22:49PM -0700, fei.yang@intel.com wrote:
> From: Fei Yang <fei.yang@intel.com>
> 
> Hardware requires the software to poll the valid bit and make sure it's
> cleared before issuing a new TLB invalidation request.
> We also need to avoid racing against GuC on TLB invalidations by only
> allowing KMD to issue TLB invalidation request during GuC reset.
> 
> v2: separate ggtt inval to xe_gam_port and call in guc_reset only (Matt)
> 

I guess CI doesn't like this... Unsure why, clearly missed something in
my suggestion.

Maybe it is best move this new code into xe_guc_tlb_inval.c for TLB now
unless someone really has time to dig in.

Matt

> Signed-off-by: Fei Yang <fei.yang@intel.com>
> Suggested-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> Cc: Stuart Summers <stuart.summers@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile           |  1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gam_port.c      | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gam_port.h      | 15 ++++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c            |  1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_types.h      |  7 +++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c           |  4 ++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_tlb_inval.c | 18 -------
>  7 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gam_port.c
>  create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gam_port.h
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile
> index f9abaf687d46..96127ad60e9b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile
> @@ -78,6 +78,7 @@ xe-y += xe_bb.o \
>  	xe_guc_rc.o \
>  	xe_guc_submit.o \
>  	xe_guc_tlb_inval.o \
> +	xe_gam_port.o \
>  	xe_heci_gsc.o \
>  	xe_huc.o \
>  	xe_hw_engine.o \
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gam_port.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gam_port.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..137887cf93b8
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gam_port.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
> +/*
> + * Copyright © 2025 Intel Corporation
> + */
> +
> +#include "xe_gt_stats.h"
> +#include "xe_gt_types.h"
> +#include "xe_gt_printk.h"
> +#include "xe_mmio.h"
> +#include "xe_gam_port.h"
> +
> +#include "regs/xe_guc_regs.h"
> +
> +/*
> + * GGTT TLB invalidation as part of GuC reset flow while the communication
> + * between host and GuC is disabled.
> + */
> +
> +int xe_gam_port_tlb_inval_ggtt(struct xe_gt *gt)
> +{
> +	struct xe_device *xe = gt_to_xe(gt);
> +	struct xe_mmio *mmio = &gt->mmio;
> +	int ret = 0;
> +
> +	spin_lock(&gt->mmio_tlb_invl_lock);
> +
> +	if (xe->info.platform == XE_PVC || GRAPHICS_VER(xe) >= 20) {
> +		/* Wait 1-second for the valid bit to be cleared */
> +		ret = xe_mmio_wait32(mmio, PVC_GUC_TLB_INV_DESC0, PVC_GUC_TLB_INV_DESC0_VALID,
> +				     0, 1000 * USEC_PER_MSEC, NULL, true);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			ret = -ECANCELED;
> +			goto out;
> +		}
> +
> +		xe_mmio_write32(mmio, PVC_GUC_TLB_INV_DESC1, PVC_GUC_TLB_INV_DESC1_INVALIDATE);
> +		xe_mmio_write32(mmio, PVC_GUC_TLB_INV_DESC0, PVC_GUC_TLB_INV_DESC0_VALID);
> +
> +		/* Wait 1-second for the valid bit to be cleared */
> +		ret = xe_mmio_wait32(mmio, PVC_GUC_TLB_INV_DESC0, PVC_GUC_TLB_INV_DESC0_VALID,
> +				     0, 1000 * USEC_PER_MSEC, NULL, true);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			ret = -ECANCELED;
> +			goto out;
> +		}
> +	} else {
> +		/* Wait 1-second for the valid bit to be cleared */
> +		ret = xe_mmio_wait32(mmio, GUC_TLB_INV_CR, GUC_TLB_INV_CR_INVALIDATE,
> +				     0, 1000 * USEC_PER_MSEC, NULL, true);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			ret = -ECANCELED;
> +			goto out;
> +		}
> +
> +		xe_mmio_write32(mmio, GUC_TLB_INV_CR, GUC_TLB_INV_CR_INVALIDATE);
> +
> +		/* Wait 1-second for the valid bit to be cleared */
> +		ret = xe_mmio_wait32(mmio, GUC_TLB_INV_CR, GUC_TLB_INV_CR_INVALIDATE,
> +				     0, 1000 * USEC_PER_MSEC, NULL, true);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			ret = -ECANCELED;
> +			goto out;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +out:
> +	spin_unlock(&gt->mmio_tlb_invl_lock);
> +
> +	if (ret)
> +		xe_gt_warn(gt, "TLB INVAL cancelled due to uncleared valid bit\n");
> +	return ret;
> +}
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gam_port.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gam_port.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..b5c383d635f1
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gam_port.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT */
> +/*
> + * Copyright © 2025 Intel Corporation
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef _XE_GAM_PORT_H_
> +#define _XE_GAM_PORT_H_
> +
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +
> +struct xe_gt;
> +
> +int xe_gam_port_tlb_inval_ggtt(struct xe_gt *gt);
> +
> +#endif
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c
> index 8a31c963c372..6bb990069eff 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c
> @@ -514,6 +514,7 @@ int xe_gt_init_early(struct xe_gt *gt)
>  
>  	xe_force_wake_init_gt(gt, gt_to_fw(gt));
>  	spin_lock_init(&gt->global_invl_lock);
> +	spin_lock_init(&gt->mmio_tlb_invl_lock);
>  
>  	err = xe_gt_tlb_inval_init_early(gt);
>  	if (err)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_types.h
> index 8b55cf25a75f..2418a0b2f19c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_types.h
> @@ -324,6 +324,13 @@ struct xe_gt {
>  	 */
>  	spinlock_t global_invl_lock;
>  
> +	/**
> +	 * @mmio_tlb_invl_lock: prevents back to back TLB invalidation
> +	 *    without polling for hardware clearance for the previous
> +	 *    invalidation
> +	 */
> +	spinlock_t mmio_tlb_invl_lock;
> +
>  	/** @wa_active: keep track of active workarounds */
>  	struct {
>  		/** @wa_active.gt: bitmap with active GT workarounds */
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c
> index e762eada21db..70eff5b22fbb 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c
> @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@
>  #include "xe_uc_fw.h"
>  #include "xe_wa.h"
>  #include "xe_wopcm.h"
> +#include "xe_gam_port.h"
>  
>  static u32 guc_bo_ggtt_addr(struct xe_guc *guc,
>  			    struct xe_bo *bo)
> @@ -991,6 +992,9 @@ int xe_guc_reset(struct xe_guc *guc)
>  		goto err_out;
>  	}
>  
> +	if (xe_gam_port_tlb_inval_ggtt(gt))
> +		xe_gt_warn(gt, "GGTT TLB invalidation timed out\n");
> +
>  	return 0;
>  
>  err_out:
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_tlb_inval.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_tlb_inval.c
> index ced58f46f846..7c3e63e49760 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_tlb_inval.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_tlb_inval.c
> @@ -61,8 +61,6 @@ static int send_tlb_inval_all(struct xe_tlb_inval *tlb_inval, u32 seqno)
>  static int send_tlb_inval_ggtt(struct xe_tlb_inval *tlb_inval, u32 seqno)
>  {
>  	struct xe_guc *guc = tlb_inval->private;
> -	struct xe_gt *gt = guc_to_gt(guc);
> -	struct xe_device *xe = guc_to_xe(guc);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Returning -ECANCELED in this function is squashed at the caller and
> @@ -77,22 +75,6 @@ static int send_tlb_inval_ggtt(struct xe_tlb_inval *tlb_inval, u32 seqno)
>  		};
>  
>  		return send_tlb_inval(guc, action, ARRAY_SIZE(action));
> -	} else if (xe_device_uc_enabled(xe) && !xe_device_wedged(xe)) {
> -		struct xe_mmio *mmio = &gt->mmio;
> -
> -		if (IS_SRIOV_VF(xe))
> -			return -ECANCELED;
> -
> -		CLASS(xe_force_wake, fw_ref)(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GT);
> -		if (xe->info.platform == XE_PVC || GRAPHICS_VER(xe) >= 20) {
> -			xe_mmio_write32(mmio, PVC_GUC_TLB_INV_DESC1,
> -					PVC_GUC_TLB_INV_DESC1_INVALIDATE);
> -			xe_mmio_write32(mmio, PVC_GUC_TLB_INV_DESC0,
> -					PVC_GUC_TLB_INV_DESC0_VALID);
> -		} else {
> -			xe_mmio_write32(mmio, GUC_TLB_INV_CR,
> -					GUC_TLB_INV_CR_INVALIDATE);
> -		}
>  	}
>  
>  	return -ECANCELED;
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-04-06 18:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-04  6:22 [PATCH] drm/xe: Wait for HW clearance before issuing the next TLB inval fei.yang
2026-04-04  6:23 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/xe: Wait for HW clearance before issuing the next TLB inval. (rev2) Patchwork
2026-04-04  6:24 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-04-04  7:12 ` ✗ Xe.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2026-04-04  7:31 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork
2026-04-06 18:59 ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2026-04-06 21:01 ` [PATCH] drm/xe: Wait for HW clearance before issuing the next TLB inval Matt Roper
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-03-17 23:21 fei.yang
2026-03-17 23:28 ` Summers, Stuart
2026-03-22  5:35   ` Matthew Brost
2026-03-24 20:39     ` Yang, Fei
2026-03-24 20:53       ` Matthew Brost
2026-03-24 20:58         ` Matthew Brost
2026-03-24 21:10           ` Summers, Stuart
2026-03-24 23:36             ` Matthew Brost
2026-03-25 18:37               ` Summers, Stuart
2026-03-25 22:00                 ` Matthew Brost
2026-03-25 22:25                   ` Summers, Stuart
2026-03-25 22:38                     ` Matthew Brost
2026-03-25 22:43                       ` Summers, Stuart
2026-03-26  0:54                         ` Matthew Brost

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=adQChk1p9hRnvQxl@gsse-cloud1.jf.intel.com \
    --to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=fei.yang@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=stuart.summers@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox