From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 302A6CD37BE for ; Mon, 11 May 2026 15:46:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1AA310E1D4; Mon, 11 May 2026 15:46:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: gabe.freedesktop.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="cxg7ndTw"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.9]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CB5B10E1D4 for ; Mon, 11 May 2026 15:46:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1778514387; x=1810050387; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=kB89qdXOyZLuTbG6QgzINZW54APg6GSemzWZ4Yl4oTQ=; b=cxg7ndTwNrqGlWXlTTCYH25Q5l0G+DXwNk4Tdqjosr1Oax15y1XD80ds d0W1gV9e+g9eJYxv1MQTUtKH5Z3FhdTRY/UwUREz1IYLS78XD+4PCBRJj eirC6V6QBe08kJLrL0R1rDr6c/q/q+m8q4j4TfrlSCbcwk9p4rvmM4cb0 W53WwXH+0TFdDPYxLLR035GXulVF2Rnmz83nGrsDK4Ne+XOIP8HZuGGLV LoY6okUq8NyX66LNKmzJrZNt7v2wtgMs9VtC0dr4x8WHejo99ZZnm5QUk QCdLlvND9oRiwTs6kVvIsoQGuTzGXadTV2XhAXuMaxB4/sV3VXSTxHE+h A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: Zw2YpNdxRV6MoAJNCh6aNA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 0IjVxBlfRJiPmuXauEuNvw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11783"; a="102067667" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,229,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="102067667" Received: from orviesa006.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.146]) by orvoesa101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 May 2026 08:46:27 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: x1oClgffRMGzoC/YJYkQNg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: no4WJUhGSwybL0Pr3uxQpg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,229,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="236513812" Received: from black.igk.intel.com ([10.91.253.5]) by orviesa006.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 May 2026 08:46:25 -0700 Date: Mon, 11 May 2026 17:46:21 +0200 From: Raag Jadav To: Riana Tauro Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, anshuman.gupta@intel.com, rodrigo.vivi@intel.com, aravind.iddamsetty@linux.intel.com, badal.nilawar@intel.com, ravi.kishore.koppuravuri@intel.com, mallesh.koujalagi@intel.com, soham.purkait@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 6/6] drm/xe/xe_ras: Control xe drm_ras registration with a flag Message-ID: References: <20260504065614.3832331-8-riana.tauro@intel.com> <20260504065614.3832331-14-riana.tauro@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260504065614.3832331-14-riana.tauro@intel.com> X-BeenThere: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel Xe graphics driver List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: intel-xe-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-xe" On Mon, May 04, 2026 at 12:26:21PM +0530, Riana Tauro wrote: > Add a flag to control xe drm_ras registration. Technically we don't control anything, it's just a matter of preference :D But nit: "Add drm_ras feature flag." > Enable this flag for PVC and CRI to support exposing RAS error counters via netlink. How's checkpatch happy with this? :/ > Signed-off-by: Riana Tauro Reviewed-by: Raag Jadav