From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>, <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
<thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>, <riana.tauro@intel.com>,
<michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>, <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>,
<michal.winiarski@intel.com>, <matthew.auld@intel.com>,
<dev@lankhorst.se>, <jani.nikula@intel.com>,
<lukasz.laguna@intel.com>, <zhanjun.dong@intel.com>,
<lukas@wunner.de>, <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>,
<badal.nilawar@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 09/10] drm/xe/pci: Introduce PCIe FLR
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2026 06:40:17 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aiAEkacJRi3Obwo2@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260603101814.916948-10-raag.jadav@intel.com>
On Wed, Jun 03, 2026 at 03:47:09PM +0530, Raag Jadav wrote:
> With bare minimum pieces in place, we can finally introduce PCIe Function
> Level Reset (FLR) support which re-initializes hardware state without the
> need for reloading the driver from userspace. All VRAM contents are lost
> along with hardware state and driver takes care of recreating the required
> kernel bos as part of re-initialization, but user still needs to recreate
> user bos and reload context after PCIe FLR.
>
> Signed-off-by: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>
> Tested-by: Lukasz Laguna <lukasz.laguna@intel.com>
> ---
> v2: Spell out Function Level Reset (Jani)
> v5: Prevent PM ref leak for wedged device (Matthew Brost)
> v6: Add PCIe FLR documentation (Daniele)
> v7: Refine PCIe FLR documentation (Daniele)
> Introduce xe_pci_reset_skip() helper (Lukasz)
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h | 3 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.h | 2 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci_error.c | 126 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 5 files changed, 133 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci_error.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile
> index 09661f079d03..091872771e98 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile
> @@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ xe-y += xe_bb.o \
> xe_page_reclaim.o \
> xe_pat.o \
> xe_pci.o \
> + xe_pci_error.o \
> xe_pci_rebar.o \
> xe_pcode.o \
> xe_pm.o \
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h
> index 66e673e4e3e7..ddcfcf1ad0ac 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h
> @@ -480,6 +480,9 @@ struct xe_device {
> /** @pxp: Encapsulate Protected Xe Path support */
> struct xe_pxp *pxp;
>
> + /** @flr_prepared: Prepared for function-reset */
> + bool flr_prepared;
> +
> /** @needs_flr_on_fini: requests function-reset on fini */
> bool needs_flr_on_fini;
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c
> index 3165686e3e04..205ba01e713c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c
> @@ -1351,6 +1351,7 @@ static struct pci_driver xe_pci_driver = {
> #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> .driver.pm = &xe_pm_ops,
> #endif
> + .err_handler = &xe_pci_error_handlers,
> };
>
> /**
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.h
> index 11bcc5fe2c5b..24e51a71a959 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.h
> @@ -8,6 +8,8 @@
>
> struct pci_dev;
>
> +extern const struct pci_error_handlers xe_pci_error_handlers;
> +
> int xe_register_pci_driver(void);
> void xe_unregister_pci_driver(void);
> struct xe_device *xe_pci_to_pf_device(struct pci_dev *pdev);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci_error.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci_error.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..21d8a97e38cc
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci_error.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,126 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
> +/*
> + * Copyright © 2026 Intel Corporation
> + */
> +
> +#include "xe_device.h"
> +#include "xe_printk.h"
> +#include "xe_sriov_pf_helpers.h"
> +
> +/**
> + * DOC: PCI Error Handling
Perhaps 'Xe PCI Error Handling' on this and on the next patch as well.
Only to avoid some ditracted doc reader to think it is a main PCI section?!
> + *
> + * Xe driver registers PCI callbacks which are called by PCI core in case of
> + * bus errors or resets.
> + *
> + * Currently only Function Level Reset (FLR) callbacks are supported. PCIe FLR
> + * wipes the VRAM and resets the state of all the hardware units. Therefore, the
> + * contents of all exec queues and BOs in VRAM are lost and the hardware needs a
> + * full re-initialization. The way Xe driver handles it, is pretty much similar
> + * to system suspend/resume flow with a few notable exceptions.
> + *
> + * Prepare phase:
> + *
> + * - Temporarily wedge the device to prevent userspace access
> + * - Kill exec queues which signals all fences and frees in-flight jobs
> + * - Stop the scheduler and all submissions to GuC
> + * - The fact that FLR is needed is because hardware could be in corrupted state
> + * and access unreliable, so skip memory eviction due to untrustworthy VRAM
> + * contents
> + * - Remove all memory mappings since VRAM contents will be lost
> + *
> + * Re-initialization phase:
> + *
> + * - Recreate kernel BOs due to skipped memory eviction in prepare phase
> + * - Restore kernel queues which were killed in prepare phase
> + * - Reload all uC firmwares
> + * - Bring up all hardware units
> + * - Unwedge the device to allow userspace access
> + *
> + * Since VRAM contents are lost, the user is expected to recreate user memory
> + * and reload context.
> + *
> + * TODO: Add PCIe error handling callbacks using similar flow.
> + *
> + * Current implementation is only limited to re-initializing GT. This needs to
> + * be extended for a lot of components listed below.
> + *
> + * - Proper re-initialization of GSC and PXP for integrated platforms
> + * - SR-IOV cases which need PF and VF synchronization
> + * - Re-initialization of all child devices registered by Xe
> + * - User memory handling and MM corner cases
> + * - Display
Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> + */
> +
> +static inline bool xe_pci_reset_skip(struct xe_device *xe)
> +{
> + return !IS_DGFX(xe) || IS_SRIOV_VF(xe) || xe_sriov_pf_num_vfs(xe) || xe->info.probe_display;
> +}
> +
> +static void xe_pci_reset_prepare(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> + struct xe_device *xe = pdev_to_xe_device(pdev);
> +
> + if (xe_pci_reset_skip(xe)) {
> + xe_err(xe, "PCIe FLR not supported\n");
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + if (xe_device_wedged(xe)) {
> + xe_err(xe, "PCIe FLR aborted, device in unexpected state\n");
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + /* Wedge the device to prevent userspace access but don't send the event yet */
> + xe_device_wedged_get(xe);
> +
> + /*
> + * The hardware could be in corrupted state and access unreliable, but we try to
> + * update data structures and cleanup any pending work to avoid side effects during
> + * PCIe FLR. This will be similar to system suspend flow but without eviction.
> + */
> + if (xe_device_suspend(xe, true)) {
perhaps err = xe_device...
if (err) {
> + xe_err(xe, "Failed to prepare for PCIe FLR\n");
> + /* Allow user to retry FLR */
> + xe_device_wedged_put(xe);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + xe->flr_prepared = true;
> + xe_info(xe, "Prepared for PCIe FLR\n");
> +}
> +
> +static void xe_pci_reset_done(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> + struct xe_device *xe = pdev_to_xe_device(pdev);
> +
> + if (xe_pci_reset_skip(xe))
> + return;
> +
> + if (!xe_device_wedged(xe) || !xe->flr_prepared)
> + return;
> +
> + /* Unprepare early in case we fail */
> + xe->flr_prepared = false;
> +
> + /*
> + * We already have the data structures intact, so try to re-initialize the device.
> + * This will be similar to system resume flow, except we'll also need to recreate
> + * kernel bos and restore kernel queues.
> + */
> + if (xe_device_resume(xe, true)) {
same here...
> + xe_err(xe, "Re-initialization failed\n");
> + /* Allow user to retry FLR */
> + xe_device_wedged_put(xe);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + /* Unwedge to allow userspace access */
> + xe_device_wedged_put(xe);
> + xe_info(xe, "Re-initialization success\n");
> +}
> +
> +const struct pci_error_handlers xe_pci_error_handlers = {
> + .reset_prepare = xe_pci_reset_prepare,
> + .reset_done = xe_pci_reset_done,
> +};
> --
> 2.43.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-03 10:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-03 10:17 [PATCH v8 00/10] Introduce Xe PCIe FLR Raag Jadav
2026-06-03 10:17 ` [PATCH v8 01/10] drm/xe/uc_fw: Allow re-initializing firmware Raag Jadav
2026-06-03 10:17 ` [PATCH v8 02/10] drm/xe/guc_submit: Introduce guc_exec_queue_reinit_kernel() Raag Jadav
2026-06-03 10:17 ` [PATCH v8 03/10] drm/xe/gt: Introduce FLR helpers Raag Jadav
2026-06-03 10:17 ` [PATCH v8 04/10] drm/xe/bo_evict: Introduce xe_bo_restore_map() Raag Jadav
2026-06-03 10:17 ` [PATCH v8 05/10] drm/xe/exec_queue: Introduce xe_exec_queue_reinit() Raag Jadav
2026-06-03 10:17 ` [PATCH v8 06/10] drm/xe/migrate: Introduce xe_migrate_reinit() Raag Jadav
2026-06-03 10:17 ` [PATCH v8 07/10] drm/xe/pm: Introduce xe_device_suspend/resume() Raag Jadav
2026-06-03 10:58 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-06-03 10:17 ` [PATCH v8 08/10] drm/xe: Improve wedged state management Raag Jadav
2026-06-03 10:56 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-06-04 6:52 ` Tauro, Riana
2026-06-04 8:39 ` Raag Jadav
2026-06-03 10:17 ` [PATCH v8 09/10] drm/xe/pci: Introduce PCIe FLR Raag Jadav
2026-06-03 10:40 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2026-06-03 10:17 ` [PATCH v8 10/10] drm/xe/doc: Wire up PCI Error Handling Raag Jadav
2026-06-03 10:28 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Introduce Xe PCIe FLR (rev8) Patchwork
2026-06-03 10:29 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-06-03 11:11 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-06-03 22:55 ` ✓ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aiAEkacJRi3Obwo2@intel.com \
--to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=badal.nilawar@intel.com \
--cc=daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com \
--cc=dev@lankhorst.se \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=lukasz.laguna@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--cc=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
--cc=michal.winiarski@intel.com \
--cc=raag.jadav@intel.com \
--cc=riana.tauro@intel.com \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
--cc=zhanjun.dong@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox