From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: "Souza, Jose" <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: "intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Upadhyay, Tejas" <tejas.upadhyay@intel.com>,
"Brost, Matthew" <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
"Ghimiray, Himal Prasad" <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>,
"Auld, Matthew" <matthew.auld@intel.com>,
"thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com"
<thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
"Mrozek, Michal" <michal.mrozek@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V11 11/12] drm/xe/uapi: Expose ban reason in EXEC_QUEUE_GET_PROPERTY_BAN
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2026 20:37:59 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aidgZ1zsihvCPGqq@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <543ed281612b0f8b1cd289448ae917896f18200c.camel@intel.com>
On Mon, Jun 08, 2026 at 10:03:50AM -0400, Souza, Jose wrote:
> On Fri, 2026-06-05 at 18:08 +0530, Tejas Upadhyay wrote:
> > Extend DRM_XE_EXEC_QUEUE_GET_PROPERTY_BAN to return a bitmask
> > indicating
> > the reason for the ban, rather than a simple boolean. This allows
> > userspace to distinguish between different ban causes:
> >
> > - DRM_XE_EXEC_QUEUE_BAN_REASON_GPU_HANG (bit 0): exec queue was
> > banned
> > due to a GPU hang or job timeout detected by the TDR.
> > - DRM_XE_EXEC_QUEUE_BAN_REASON_PAGE_OFFLINE (bit 1): exec queue was
> > banned because a VRAM page backing its resources was taken offline.
> >
> > The ban_reason field is added to struct xe_exec_queue and set at the
> > point where the ban is triggered:
> > - In guc_exec_queue_timedout_job() for GPU hang.
> > - In xe_ttm_vram_purge_page() for memory page offline, before calling
> > xe_exec_queue_kill() or xe_vm_kill().
> >
> > The reset_status op is updated to return u64 with the reason bitmask.
> > When a queue is banned but no explicit reason was recorded (e.g.,
> > from a
> > generic CAT error), it defaults to GPU_HANG for backward
> > compatibility.
> > A value of 0 means the exec queue is not banned.
> >
>
> Acked-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Do we already have a userpace change with this?
Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Thomas, thought on this vs the watch_queue you have or they are orthogonal?
>
> > Assisted-by: Copilot:claude-opus-4.6
> > Signed-off-by: Tejas Upadhyay <tejas.upadhyay@intel.com>
> > cc: Mrozek, Michal <michal.mrozek@intel.com>
> > cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
> > cc: Vivi, Rodrigo <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue_types.h | 7 +++++--
> > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_execlist.c | 4 ++--
> > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++---
> > --
> > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ttm_vram_mgr.c | 7 +++++++
> > include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h | 12 +++++++++++-
> > 5 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue_types.h
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue_types.h
> > index 2f5ccf294675..77a621da4487 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue_types.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue_types.h
> > @@ -143,6 +143,9 @@ struct xe_exec_queue {
> > */
> > unsigned long flags;
> >
> > + /** @ban_reason: Bitmask of ban reasons
> > (DRM_XE_EXEC_QUEUE_BAN_REASON_*) */
> > + u32 ban_reason;
> > +
> > union {
> > /** @multi_gt_list: list head for VM bind engines if
> > multi-GT */
> > struct list_head multi_gt_list;
> > @@ -316,8 +319,8 @@ struct xe_exec_queue_ops {
> > * signalled when this function is called.
> > */
> > void (*resume)(struct xe_exec_queue *q);
> > - /** @reset_status: check exec queue reset status */
> > - bool (*reset_status)(struct xe_exec_queue *q);
> > + /** @reset_status: check exec queue ban status, returns ban
> > reason bitmask */
> > + u64 (*reset_status)(struct xe_exec_queue *q);
> > /** @active: check exec queue is active */
> > bool (*active)(struct xe_exec_queue *q);
> > };
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_execlist.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_execlist.c
> > index 9fb99c038ea8..35e6e05ba418 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_execlist.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_execlist.c
> > @@ -452,10 +452,10 @@ static void execlist_exec_queue_resume(struct
> > xe_exec_queue *q)
> > /* NIY */
> > }
> >
> > -static bool execlist_exec_queue_reset_status(struct xe_exec_queue
> > *q)
> > +static u64 execlist_exec_queue_reset_status(struct xe_exec_queue *q)
> > {
> > /* NIY */
> > - return false;
> > + return 0;
> > }
> >
> > static bool execlist_exec_queue_active(struct xe_exec_queue *q)
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
> > index 4b247a3019d2..ff28eab7cee2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
> > @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
> > #include "xe_guc_submit.h"
> >
> > #include <linux/bitfield.h>
> > +#include <uapi/drm/xe_drm.h>
> > #include <linux/bitmap.h>
> > #include <linux/circ_buf.h>
> > #include <linux/dma-fence-array.h>
> > @@ -1530,6 +1531,7 @@ guc_exec_queue_timedout_job(struct
> > drm_sched_job *drm_job)
> > if (!exec_queue_killed(q))
> > wedged =
> > guc_submit_hint_wedged(exec_queue_to_guc(q));
> >
> > + q->ban_reason |= DRM_XE_EXEC_QUEUE_BAN_REASON_GPU_HANG;
> > set_exec_queue_banned(q);
> >
> > /* Kick job / queue off hardware */
> > @@ -2211,13 +2213,25 @@ static void guc_exec_queue_resume(struct
> > xe_exec_queue *q)
> > xe_sched_msg_unlock(sched);
> > }
> >
> > -static bool guc_exec_queue_reset_status(struct xe_exec_queue *q)
> > +static u64 guc_exec_queue_reset_status(struct xe_exec_queue *q)
> > {
> > - if (xe_exec_queue_is_multi_queue_secondary(q) &&
> > -
> > guc_exec_queue_reset_status(xe_exec_queue_multi_queue_primary(q)))
> > - return true;
> > + if (xe_exec_queue_is_multi_queue_secondary(q)) {
> > + u64 status = guc_exec_queue_reset_status(
> > + xe_exec_queue_multi_queue_primary(q)
> > );
> > + if (status)
> > + return status;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (exec_queue_reset(q) ||
> > exec_queue_killed_or_banned_or_wedged(q)) {
> > + u64 reason = q->ban_reason;
> >
> > - return exec_queue_reset(q) ||
> > exec_queue_killed_or_banned_or_wedged(q);
> > + /* If no specific reason was recorded, default to
> > GPU hang */
> > + if (!reason)
> > + reason =
> > DRM_XE_EXEC_QUEUE_BAN_REASON_GPU_HANG;
> > + return reason;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > }
> >
> > static bool guc_exec_queue_active(struct xe_exec_queue *q)
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ttm_vram_mgr.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ttm_vram_mgr.c
> > index 35b5eaf590fa..3765e8fcdcec 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ttm_vram_mgr.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ttm_vram_mgr.c
> > @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
> > #include <drm/drm_managed.h>
> > #include <drm/drm_drv.h>
> > #include <drm/drm_buddy.h>
> > +#include <uapi/drm/xe_drm.h>
> >
> > #include <drm/ttm/ttm_placement.h>
> > #include <drm/ttm/ttm_range_manager.h>
> > @@ -537,10 +538,15 @@ static int xe_ttm_vram_purge_page(struct
> > xe_device *xe, struct xe_bo *bo)
> > xe_bo_unlock(bo);
> > /* Ban VM if BO is PPGTT */
> > if (vm && (flags & XE_BO_FLAG_PAGETABLE)) {
> > + struct xe_exec_queue *eq;
> > +
> > down_write(&vm->lock);
> > + list_for_each_entry(eq, &vm->preempt.exec_queues,
> > lr.link)
> > + eq->ban_reason |=
> > DRM_XE_EXEC_QUEUE_BAN_REASON_PAGE_OFFLINE;
> > xe_vm_kill(vm, true);
> > up_write(&vm->lock);
> > }
> > +
> > if (vm)
> > xe_vm_put(vm);
> >
> > @@ -548,6 +554,7 @@ static int xe_ttm_vram_purge_page(struct
> > xe_device *xe, struct xe_bo *bo)
> > /* Ban exec queue if BO is lrc */
> > if (bo->q && xe_exec_queue_get_unless_zero(bo->q)) {
> > /* ban queue */
> > + bo->q->ban_reason |=
> > DRM_XE_EXEC_QUEUE_BAN_REASON_PAGE_OFFLINE;
> > xe_exec_queue_kill(bo->q);
> > xe_exec_queue_put(bo->q);
> > }
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h
> > index 48e9f1fdb78d..904d58b039fe 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h
> > @@ -1503,7 +1503,17 @@ struct drm_xe_exec_queue_get_property {
> > /** @property: property to get */
> > __u32 property;
> >
> > - /** @value: property value */
> > + /**
> > + * @value: property value
> > + *
> > + * For %DRM_XE_EXEC_QUEUE_GET_PROPERTY_BAN, this is a
> > bitmask of:
> > + * - %DRM_XE_EXEC_QUEUE_BAN_REASON_GPU_HANG - banned due to
> > GPU hang/timeout
> > + * - %DRM_XE_EXEC_QUEUE_BAN_REASON_PAGE_OFFLINE - banned
> > due to memory page offline
> > + *
> > + * Value of 0 means the exec queue is not banned.
> > + */
> > +#define DRM_XE_EXEC_QUEUE_BAN_REASON_GPU_HANG (1 << 0)
> > +#define DRM_XE_EXEC_QUEUE_BAN_REASON_PAGE_OFFLINE (1 << 1)
> > __u64 value;
> >
> > /** @reserved: Reserved */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-09 0:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-05 12:38 [PATCH V11 00/12] Add memory page offlining support Tejas Upadhyay
2026-06-05 12:38 ` [PATCH V11 01/12] drm/xe: Link VRAM object with gpu buddy Tejas Upadhyay
2026-06-05 12:38 ` [PATCH V11 02/12] drm/buddy: Integrate lockdep annotations for gpu buddy manager Tejas Upadhyay
2026-06-05 12:38 ` [PATCH V11 03/12] drm/gpu: Add gpu_buddy_allocated_addr_to_block helper Tejas Upadhyay
2026-06-05 12:38 ` [PATCH V11 04/12] drm/xe: Link LRC BO and its execution Queue Tejas Upadhyay
2026-06-05 12:38 ` [PATCH V11 05/12] drm/xe: Extend BO purge to handle vram pages as well Tejas Upadhyay
2026-06-05 12:38 ` [PATCH V11 06/12] drm/xe: Handle physical memory address error Tejas Upadhyay
2026-06-05 12:38 ` [PATCH V11 07/12] drm/xe/cri: Add debugfs to inject faulty vram address Tejas Upadhyay
2026-06-05 12:38 ` [PATCH V11 08/12] gpu/buddy: Add routine to dump allocated buddy blocks Tejas Upadhyay
2026-06-05 12:38 ` [PATCH V11 09/12] drm/xe/configfs: Add vram bad page reservation policy Tejas Upadhyay
2026-06-05 12:38 ` [PATCH V11 10/12] drm/xe/cri: Add sysfs interface for bad gpu vram pages Tejas Upadhyay
2026-06-05 12:38 ` [PATCH V11 11/12] drm/xe/uapi: Expose ban reason in EXEC_QUEUE_GET_PROPERTY_BAN Tejas Upadhyay
2026-06-08 14:03 ` Souza, Jose
2026-06-09 0:37 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2026-06-10 14:17 ` Upadhyay, Tejas
2026-06-10 15:30 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-06-05 12:38 ` [PATCH V11 12/12] drm/xe: Add soft/hard offline mode for VRAM page retirement Tejas Upadhyay
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aidgZ1zsihvCPGqq@intel.com \
--to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jose.souza@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=michal.mrozek@intel.com \
--cc=tejas.upadhyay@intel.com \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox