From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] drm/gpusvm: Add a DMA-mapping accounting callback
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2026 08:37:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aimExeYtw8KZBsUq@gsse-cloud1.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260610133451.8930-1-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
On Wed, Jun 10, 2026 at 03:34:50PM +0200, Thomas Hellström wrote:
> Drivers that use the GPU SVM core to DMA-map system memory for GPU
> access may want to keep track of how many pages they have mapped, for
> example to expose statistics or to detect leaks. Doing this accounting
> in the driver around drm_gpusvm_get_pages() / drm_gpusvm_unmap_pages()
> is error prone: the number, order and kind of the dma_addr[] entries can
> change between map and unmap (migration, partial unmaps, the iova vs
> non-iova paths), which makes symmetric accounting hard to get right.
>
> Add an optional @dma_map_account callback to struct drm_gpusvm_ops and
> invoke it once per &drm_pagemap_addr entry at the exact points where the
> entry is DMA-mapped (sign == +1) in drm_gpusvm_get_pages() and unmapped
> (sign == -1) in __drm_gpusvm_unmap_pages(). Since the map error path and
> every unmap/free path funnel through __drm_gpusvm_unmap_pages() for the
> entries that were actually mapped, the accounting is symmetric by
> construction. The callback receives the full &drm_pagemap_addr so the
> driver can use the order and the proto field to distinguish system
> memory mappings from device interconnect mappings.
>
> The callback must also be usable by the core drm_gpusvm_pages-only API
> (mm == NULL), as used e.g. for userptr-style mappings. Relax
> drm_gpusvm_init() to allow such users to pass a restricted @ops that
> only implements the page-level hooks; the full-SVM hooks (@invalidate)
> and the chunk configuration must still be unset in that mode.
>
> Assisted-by: GitHub_Copilot:claude-opus-4.8
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gpusvm.c | 17 +++++++++++++++--
I believe this makes sense and is useful for debugging/profiling — the
same applies to the next patch.
I do have a question, though: drm_pagemap also performs DMA mapping for
migrations. Should we include those in the accounting as well, or was
there a reason this was intentionally omitted?
Matt
> include/drm/drm_gpusvm.h | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gpusvm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gpusvm.c
> index 958cb605aedd..c18f15c77e94 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gpusvm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gpusvm.c
> @@ -393,8 +393,15 @@ int drm_gpusvm_init(struct drm_gpusvm *gpusvm,
> return -EINVAL;
> mmgrab(mm);
> } else {
> - /* No full SVM mode, only core drm_gpusvm_pages API. */
> - if (ops || num_chunks || mm_range || notifier_size)
> + /*
> + * No full SVM mode, only core drm_gpusvm_pages API. A
> + * restricted @ops that only implements the page-level hooks
> + * (e.g. @dma_map_account) is allowed; the full-SVM hooks must
> + * not be set.
> + */
> + if (num_chunks || mm_range || notifier_size)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + if (ops && ops->invalidate)
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> @@ -1162,6 +1169,8 @@ static void __drm_gpusvm_unmap_pages(struct drm_gpusvm *gpusvm,
> else if (dpagemap && dpagemap->ops->device_unmap)
> dpagemap->ops->device_unmap(dpagemap,
> dev, addr);
> + if (gpusvm->ops && gpusvm->ops->dma_map_account)
> + gpusvm->ops->dma_map_account(gpusvm, addr, -1);
> i += 1 << addr->order;
> }
>
> @@ -1584,6 +1593,10 @@ int drm_gpusvm_get_pages(struct drm_gpusvm *gpusvm,
> (addr, DRM_INTERCONNECT_SYSTEM, order,
> dma_dir);
> }
> + if (gpusvm->ops && gpusvm->ops->dma_map_account)
> + gpusvm->ops->dma_map_account(gpusvm,
> + &svm_pages->dma_addr[j],
> + 1);
> i += 1 << order;
> num_dma_mapped = i;
> flags.has_dma_mapping = true;
> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_gpusvm.h b/include/drm/drm_gpusvm.h
> index 8a4d7134a9a7..87ad2dcaa7c4 100644
> --- a/include/drm/drm_gpusvm.h
> +++ b/include/drm/drm_gpusvm.h
> @@ -75,6 +75,25 @@ struct drm_gpusvm_ops {
> void (*invalidate)(struct drm_gpusvm *gpusvm,
> struct drm_gpusvm_notifier *notifier,
> const struct mmu_notifier_range *mmu_range);
> +
> + /**
> + * @dma_map_account: Account a DMA-mapping change (optional)
> + * @gpusvm: Pointer to the GPU SVM
> + * @addr: The address descriptor of the chunk being (un)mapped
> + * @sign: +1 when @addr has just been DMA-mapped, -1 when it is being
> + * unmapped
> + *
> + * Called once per &drm_pagemap_addr entry, when the entry is
> + * DMA-mapped by drm_gpusvm_get_pages() (@sign == +1) and when it is
> + * unmapped (@sign == -1), so the driver can keep symmetric accounting
> + * of the pages it has mapped for GPU access. The @addr->proto field
> + * can be used to distinguish system-memory mappings from device
> + * interconnect mappings. May be provided in both full SVM mode and the
> + * core drm_gpusvm_pages-only mode.
> + */
> + void (*dma_map_account)(struct drm_gpusvm *gpusvm,
> + const struct drm_pagemap_addr *addr,
> + int sign);
> };
>
> /**
> --
> 2.54.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-10 15:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-10 13:34 [RFC PATCH 1/2] drm/gpusvm: Add a DMA-mapping accounting callback Thomas Hellström
2026-06-10 13:34 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] drm/xe: Add debugfs stats for DMA-mapped pages per order Thomas Hellström
2026-06-10 13:43 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for series starting with [RFC,1/2] drm/gpusvm: Add a DMA-mapping accounting callback Patchwork
2026-06-10 14:23 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-06-10 15:37 ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2026-06-10 17:55 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aimExeYtw8KZBsUq@gsse-cloud1.jf.intel.com \
--to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox