From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>, <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] drm/{i915,xe}: add new intel_display_driver_runtime_pm_{enable,disable}()
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2026 16:01:51 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ajBaL3rPX6SGsyvK@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9a3ab94dda708f809bfbdfbc9034a2d718885f1e.1781527161.git.jani.nikula@intel.com>
On Mon, Jun 15, 2026 at 03:40:46PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Add new high-level functions intel_display_driver_runtime_pm_enable()
> and intel_display_driver_runtime_pm_disable() to abstract the low-level
> functions intel_display_power_enable() and
> intel_display_power_disable(), respectively.
>
> The asymmetry in the "runtime pm enable/disable" and "pm runtime
> suspend/etc" naming is intentional, with the latter intended to be
> called from the PM hooks.
>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> Suggested-by: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_driver.c | 10 ++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_driver.h | 3 +++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c | 8 ++++----
> 4 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_driver.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_driver.c
> index 67f416070fe0..a11186be9756 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_driver.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_driver.c
> @@ -869,6 +869,16 @@ void intel_display_driver_pm_resume(struct intel_display *display)
> intel_display_power_enable(display);
> }
>
> +void intel_display_driver_runtime_pm_enable(struct intel_display *display)
> +{
> + intel_display_power_enable(display);
> +}
> +
> +void intel_display_driver_runtime_pm_disable(struct intel_display *display)
> +{
> + intel_display_power_disable(display);
> +}
> +
> void intel_display_driver_pm_runtime_suspend(struct intel_display *display)
> {
> intel_display_power_runtime_suspend(display);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_driver.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_driver.h
> index 1b494337d629..1ae2ad7e95f6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_driver.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_driver.h
> @@ -43,6 +43,9 @@ void intel_display_driver_suspend_access(struct intel_display *display);
> void intel_display_driver_resume_access(struct intel_display *display);
> bool intel_display_driver_check_access(struct intel_display *display);
>
> +void intel_display_driver_runtime_pm_enable(struct intel_display *display);
> +void intel_display_driver_runtime_pm_disable(struct intel_display *display);
> +
> void intel_display_driver_pm_runtime_suspend(struct intel_display *display);
> void intel_display_driver_pm_runtime_suspend_late(struct intel_display *display);
> void intel_display_driver_pm_runtime_resume_early(struct intel_display *display);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c
> index 01aaa66e7cab..4d01168d37cf 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c
> @@ -659,7 +659,7 @@ static int i915_driver_register(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>
> intel_display_driver_register(display);
>
> - intel_display_power_enable(display);
> + intel_display_driver_runtime_pm_enable(display);
> intel_runtime_pm_enable(&dev_priv->runtime_pm);
>
> if (i915_switcheroo_register(dev_priv))
> @@ -681,7 +681,7 @@ static void i915_driver_unregister(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> i915_switcheroo_unregister(dev_priv);
>
> intel_runtime_pm_disable(&dev_priv->runtime_pm);
> - intel_display_power_disable(display);
> + intel_display_driver_runtime_pm_disable(display);
>
> intel_display_driver_unregister(display);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
> index a5768736dbbc..493e9e09b6c9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
> @@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ void xe_display_register(struct xe_device *xe)
> return;
>
> intel_display_driver_register(display);
> - intel_display_power_enable(display);
> + intel_display_driver_runtime_pm_enable(display);
> }
>
> void xe_display_unregister(struct xe_device *xe)
> @@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ void xe_display_unregister(struct xe_device *xe)
> if (!xe->info.probe_display)
> return;
>
> - intel_display_power_disable(display);
> + intel_display_driver_runtime_pm_disable(display);
> intel_display_driver_unregister(display);
> }
>
> @@ -331,7 +331,7 @@ static void xe_display_enable_d3cold(struct xe_device *xe)
> * We do a lot of poking in a lot of registers, make sure they work
> * properly.
> */
> - intel_display_power_disable(display);
> + intel_display_driver_runtime_pm_disable(display);
>
> intel_display_flush_cleanup_work(display);
>
> @@ -364,7 +364,7 @@ static void xe_display_disable_d3cold(struct xe_device *xe)
>
> intel_opregion_resume(display);
>
> - intel_display_power_enable(display);
> + intel_display_driver_runtime_pm_enable(display);
> }
>
> void xe_display_pm_runtime_suspend(struct xe_device *xe)
> --
> 2.47.3
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-15 20:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-15 12:40 [PATCH 0/4] drm/{i915,xe}: unify runtime pm calls Jani Nikula
2026-06-15 12:40 ` [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: add intel_display_driver_pm_runtime*() functions Jani Nikula
2026-06-15 12:40 ` [PATCH 2/4] drm/{i915, xe}: add new intel_display_driver_runtime_pm_{enable, disable}() Jani Nikula
2026-06-15 20:01 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2026-06-15 12:40 ` [PATCH 3/4] drm/xe/display: separate d3cold handling from xe_display_pm_runtime_suspend_late() Jani Nikula
2026-06-15 20:09 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-06-15 20:34 ` Jani Nikula
2026-06-15 12:40 ` [PATCH 4/4] drm/xe/display: unify runtime suspend/resume with i915 for non-d3cold Jani Nikula
2026-06-15 12:48 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/{i915,xe}: unify runtime pm calls Patchwork
2026-06-15 13:46 ` ✗ Xe.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2026-06-15 14:41 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ajBaL3rPX6SGsyvK@intel.com \
--to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox