From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: "Gabríel Arthúr Pétursson" <gabriel.petursson@jbtmarel.com>
Cc: "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"jani.nikula@linux.intel.com" <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
"rodrigo.vivi@intel.com" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
"joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com"
<joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
"tursulin@ursulin.net" <tursulin@ursulin.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Calculate CDCLK on modeset after sanitizing pre-os programming
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2026 17:24:43 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ajqXK-fZnty-YGCK@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AM9PR06MB78601E2636164181A4689CC281EF2@AM9PR06MB7860.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>
On Mon, Jun 22, 2026 at 02:52:29PM +0000, Gabríel Arthúr Pétursson wrote:
> After sanitizing cdclk programming by pre-os, the cdclk frequency is set
> to the lowest supported setting. After which, modesetting needs to
> recalculate the appropriate frequency.
>
> When upgrading the kernel, we encountered an issue where we were left
> with a blank screen at boot on a number of monitors and the following
> message in dmesg:
>
> i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] *ERROR* CPU pipe A FIFO underrun
>
> Which bisected to these two commits, depending on the exact monitor used
> during the bisect:
>
> ba91b9eecb47 ("drm/i915/cdclk: Decouple cdclk from state->modeset")
> 74c31271a1d9 ("drm/i915: Avoid triggering unwanted cdclk changes due to dbuf bandwidth changes")
>
> Although both commits look correct, before they hid the need to explicitly
> trigger CDCLK recalculation after sanitization.
This smells like the same thing I already fixed with
commit 3f9de66f8acb ("drm/i915/cdclk: Fix up CDCLK_FREQ_DECIMAL
without a full PLL re-enable")
Sadly it looks like I forgot to cc:stable it :/
Jani, can you pick that up for -fixes and slap a cc:stable on it?
>
> Signed-off-by: Gabríel Arthúr Pétursson <gabriel.petursson@jbtmarel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c | 10 ++++++++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> index a47736613f6e..5eba50fde396 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> @@ -1267,6 +1267,8 @@ static void skl_sanitize_cdclk(struct intel_display *display)
> display->cdclk.hw.cdclk = 0;
> /* force full PLL disable + enable */
> display->cdclk.hw.vco = ~0;
> + /* modesetting may require another cdclk programming */
> + display->cdclk.hw.sanitized = true;
> }
>
> static void skl_cdclk_init_hw(struct intel_display *display)
> @@ -2365,9 +2367,10 @@ static void bxt_sanitize_cdclk(struct intel_display *display)
>
> /* force cdclk programming */
> display->cdclk.hw.cdclk = 0;
> -
> /* force full PLL disable + enable */
> display->cdclk.hw.vco = ~0;
> + /* modesetting may require another cdclk programming */
> + display->cdclk.hw.sanitized = true;
> }
>
> static void bxt_cdclk_init_hw(struct intel_display *display)
> @@ -3598,9 +3601,10 @@ static int intel_modeset_calc_cdclk(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
>
> int intel_cdclk_atomic_check(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> {
> + struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(state);
> const struct intel_cdclk_state *old_cdclk_state;
> struct intel_cdclk_state *new_cdclk_state;
> - bool need_cdclk_calc = false;
> + bool need_cdclk_calc = display->cdclk.hw.sanitized;
> int ret;
>
> ret = intel_cdclk_modeset_checks(state, &need_cdclk_calc);
> @@ -3631,6 +3635,8 @@ int intel_cdclk_atomic_check(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> ret = intel_modeset_calc_cdclk(state);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> +
> + display->cdclk.hw.sanitized = false;
> }
>
> return 0;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.h
> index 1ff7d078b42c..bae2b7ea2da9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.h
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ struct intel_display;
> struct intel_cdclk_config {
> unsigned int cdclk, vco, ref, bypass;
> u8 voltage_level;
> + bool sanitized;
> /* This field is only valid for Xe2LPD and above. */
> bool joined_mbus;
> };
> --
> 2.54.0
>
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-23 14:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
[parent not found: <AM9PR06MB78601E2636164181A4689CC281EF2@AM9PR06MB7860.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ajqXK-fZnty-YGCK@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=gabriel.petursson@jbtmarel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=tursulin@ursulin.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox