From: "Michał Winiarski" <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
To: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/13] drm/xe/tests: Add object encoding helper test
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2026 22:47:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <akgfPCdZU8bXmWL9@nostramo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260630132633.32804-11-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
On Tue, Jun 30, 2026 at 03:26:29PM +0200, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
> We will soon be encoding complex objects as KLVs using our helper
> function. Add few simple tests to make sure this helper function
> works as expected.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
> ---
> .../drm/xe/tests/xe_guc_klv_helpers_kunit.c | 162 ++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 162 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_guc_klv_helpers_kunit.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_guc_klv_helpers_kunit.c
> index c2d5f0098816..9a8acc85e9f1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_guc_klv_helpers_kunit.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_guc_klv_helpers_kunit.c
> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
> #include <kunit/test-bug.h>
>
> #define TEST_KEY (GUC_KLV_RESERVED_RANGE_START + 0x3de)
> +#define TEST_GROUP_KEY (GUC_KLV_RESERVED_RANGE_START + 0x3f0)
> #define TEST_PAD 0xdeadbeef
>
> static void test_count(struct kunit *test)
> @@ -129,11 +130,172 @@ static void test_encode_string(struct kunit *test)
> xe_guc_klv_encode_string(failed, ARRAY_SIZE(klvs), key, string));
> }
>
> +struct some_object {
> + u32 value1;
> + u64 value2;
> +} __packed;
> +
> +static u32 *obj_raw_encoder(u32 *klvs, u32 avail, const void *arg)
> +{
> + const struct some_object *obj = arg;
> + size_t sz = sizeof(*obj);
> + u32 dwords = to_num_dwords(sz);
> +
> + if (IS_ERR(klvs))
> + return klvs;
> + if (dwords > avail)
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOSPC);
> + memcpy(klvs, obj, sz);
> + return klvs + dwords;
> +}
> +
> +static u32 *obj_klv_encoder(u32 *klvs, u32 avail, const void *arg)
> +{
> + const struct some_object *obj = arg;
> + u32 *end = klvs + avail;
> +
> + klvs = xe_guc_klv_encode_u32(klvs, end - klvs, TEST_KEY + 1, obj->value1);
> + klvs = xe_guc_klv_encode_u64(klvs, end - klvs, TEST_KEY + 2, obj->value2);
Sashiko spotted that we should check for errors between the encode
calls, and that's probably a good idea.
With that:
Reviewed-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Thanks,
-Michał
> + return klvs;
> +}
> +
> +static u32 *obj_nested_encoder(u32 *klvs, u32 avail, const void *arg)
> +{
> + u32 *end = klvs + avail;
> +
> + klvs = xe_guc_klv_encode_object(klvs, end - klvs, TEST_GROUP_KEY + 1,
> + arg, obj_klv_encoder);
> + klvs = xe_guc_klv_encode_object(klvs, end - klvs, TEST_GROUP_KEY + 2,
> + arg, obj_klv_encoder);
> + return klvs;
> +}
> +
> +static void test_encode_object_raw(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + const struct some_object obj = {
> + .value1 = 0xdead1234,
> + .value2 = 0xdead87654321dead,
> + };
> + u32 payload = to_num_dwords(sizeof(obj));
> + u32 *err = ERR_PTR(-ENOSPC);
> + u16 key = TEST_KEY;
> + u32 klvs[16];
> + u32 n;
> +
> + /* too small, must fail */
> + for (n = 0; n < GUC_KLV_LEN_MIN + payload; n++) {
> + memset32(klvs, TEST_PAD, ARRAY_SIZE(klvs));
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ_MSG(test, ERR_PTR(-ENOSPC),
> + xe_guc_klv_encode_object(klvs, n, key, &obj,
> + obj_raw_encoder),
> + "buf size=%u dwords", n);
> + }
> +
> + /* must pass */
> + memset32(klvs, TEST_PAD, ARRAY_SIZE(klvs));
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test,
> + xe_guc_klv_encode_object(klvs, GUC_KLV_LEN_MIN + payload,
> + key, &obj, obj_raw_encoder));
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, klvs[0], PREP_GUC_KLV(key, payload));
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_MEMEQ(test, &klvs[1], &obj, sizeof(obj));
> +
> + /* already failed, must fail */
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_EQ(test, err,
> + xe_guc_klv_encode_object(err, ARRAY_SIZE(klvs), key,
> + &obj, obj_raw_encoder));
> +}
> +
> +static void test_encode_object_klv(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + const struct some_object obj = {
> + .value1 = 0xdead1234,
> + .value2 = 0xdead87654321dead,
> + };
> + u16 key = TEST_GROUP_KEY;
> + u32 payload = 0;
> + u32 klvs[16];
> + u32 n;
> +
> + payload += GUC_KLV_LEN_MIN + to_num_dwords(sizeof(obj.value1));
> + payload += GUC_KLV_LEN_MIN + to_num_dwords(sizeof(obj.value2));
> +
> + /* too small, must fail */
> + for (n = 0; n < GUC_KLV_LEN_MIN + payload; n++) {
> + memset32(klvs, TEST_PAD, ARRAY_SIZE(klvs));
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ_MSG(test, ERR_PTR(-ENOSPC),
> + xe_guc_klv_encode_object(klvs, n, key, &obj,
> + obj_klv_encoder),
> + "buf size=%u dwords", n);
> + }
> +
> + /* must pass */
> + memset32(klvs, TEST_PAD, ARRAY_SIZE(klvs));
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test,
> + xe_guc_klv_encode_object(klvs, GUC_KLV_LEN_MIN + payload,
> + key, &obj, obj_klv_encoder));
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, klvs[0], PREP_GUC_KLV(key, payload));
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, klvs[1], PREP_GUC_KLV(TEST_KEY + 1, 1));
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, klvs[2], obj.value1);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, klvs[3], PREP_GUC_KLV(TEST_KEY + 2, 2));
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, klvs[4], lower_32_bits(obj.value2));
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, klvs[5], upper_32_bits(obj.value2));
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, klvs[6], TEST_PAD);
> +}
> +
> +static void test_encode_object_nested(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + const struct some_object obj = {
> + .value1 = 0xdead1234,
> + .value2 = 0xdead87654321dead,
> + };
> + u16 key = TEST_GROUP_KEY;
> + u32 payload = 0;
> + u32 klvs[16];
> + u32 n;
> +
> + payload += GUC_KLV_LEN_MIN;
> + payload += GUC_KLV_LEN_MIN + to_num_dwords(sizeof(obj.value1));
> + payload += GUC_KLV_LEN_MIN + to_num_dwords(sizeof(obj.value2));
> + payload *= 2;
> +
> + /* too small, must fail */
> + for (n = 0; n < GUC_KLV_LEN_MIN + payload; n++) {
> + memset32(klvs, TEST_PAD, ARRAY_SIZE(klvs));
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ_MSG(test, ERR_PTR(-ENOSPC),
> + xe_guc_klv_encode_object(klvs, n, key, &obj,
> + obj_nested_encoder),
> + "buf size=%u dwords", n);
> + }
> +
> + /* must pass */
> + memset32(klvs, TEST_PAD, ARRAY_SIZE(klvs));
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test,
> + xe_guc_klv_encode_object(klvs, GUC_KLV_LEN_MIN + payload,
> + key, &obj, obj_nested_encoder));
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, klvs[0], PREP_GUC_KLV(key, payload));
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, klvs[1], PREP_GUC_KLV(TEST_GROUP_KEY + 1, 5));
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, klvs[2], PREP_GUC_KLV(TEST_KEY + 1, 1));
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, klvs[3], obj.value1);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, klvs[4], PREP_GUC_KLV(TEST_KEY + 2, 2));
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, klvs[5], lower_32_bits(obj.value2));
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, klvs[6], upper_32_bits(obj.value2));
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, klvs[7], PREP_GUC_KLV(TEST_GROUP_KEY + 2, 5));
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, klvs[8], PREP_GUC_KLV(TEST_KEY + 1, 1));
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, klvs[9], obj.value1);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, klvs[10], PREP_GUC_KLV(TEST_KEY + 2, 2));
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, klvs[11], lower_32_bits(obj.value2));
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, klvs[12], upper_32_bits(obj.value2));
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, klvs[13], TEST_PAD);
> +}
> +
> static struct kunit_case guc_klv_helpers_test_cases[] = {
> KUNIT_CASE(test_count),
> KUNIT_CASE(test_encode_u32),
> KUNIT_CASE(test_encode_u64),
> KUNIT_CASE(test_encode_string),
> + KUNIT_CASE(test_encode_object_raw),
> + KUNIT_CASE(test_encode_object_klv),
> + KUNIT_CASE(test_encode_object_nested),
> {}
> };
>
> --
> 2.47.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-03 20:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-30 13:26 [PATCH 00/13] drm/xe: Add and use more KLV helpers Michal Wajdeczko
2026-06-30 13:26 ` [PATCH 01/13] drm/xe/guc: Allow to print single KLV Michal Wajdeczko
2026-07-03 11:10 ` Michał Winiarski
2026-06-30 13:26 ` [PATCH 02/13] drm/xe/guc: Prepare to print group KLVs Michal Wajdeczko
2026-07-03 11:11 ` Michał Winiarski
2026-06-30 13:26 ` [PATCH 03/13] drm/xe/guc: Add basic KLV encoding helpers Michal Wajdeczko
2026-07-03 12:58 ` Michał Winiarski
2026-06-30 13:26 ` [PATCH 04/13] drm/xe/guc: Add string KLV encoding helper Michal Wajdeczko
2026-07-03 13:29 ` Michał Winiarski
2026-07-06 16:04 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2026-06-30 13:26 ` [PATCH 05/13] drm/xe/guc: Add object " Michal Wajdeczko
2026-07-03 14:33 ` Michał Winiarski
2026-06-30 13:26 ` [PATCH 06/13] drm/xe/guc: Add KLV parsing helper Michal Wajdeczko
2026-07-03 14:40 ` Michał Winiarski
2026-06-30 13:26 ` [PATCH 07/13] drm/xe/guc: Formalize Reserved KLVs Michal Wajdeczko
2026-07-03 13:31 ` Michał Winiarski
2026-06-30 13:26 ` [PATCH 08/13] drm/xe/tests: Add GuC KLV helpers basic tests Michal Wajdeczko
2026-07-03 14:17 ` Michał Winiarski
2026-06-30 13:26 ` [PATCH 09/13] drm/xe/tests: Add string encoding helper test Michal Wajdeczko
2026-07-03 20:40 ` Michał Winiarski
2026-06-30 13:26 ` [PATCH 10/13] drm/xe/tests: Add object " Michal Wajdeczko
2026-07-03 20:47 ` Michał Winiarski [this message]
2026-07-06 16:34 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2026-06-30 13:26 ` [PATCH 11/13] drm/xe/tests: Add GuC KLV printer test Michal Wajdeczko
2026-07-03 20:49 ` Michał Winiarski
2026-06-30 13:26 ` [PATCH 12/13] drm/xe/tests: Add migration packet test Michal Wajdeczko
2026-07-03 13:44 ` Michał Winiarski
2026-07-06 16:42 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2026-06-30 13:26 ` [PATCH 13/13] drm/xe/pf: Handle migration descriptor using KLV helpers Michal Wajdeczko
2026-07-03 20:50 ` Michał Winiarski
2026-06-30 13:47 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/xe: Add and use more " Patchwork
2026-06-30 13:49 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-06-30 14:42 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-07-01 5:22 ` ✓ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=akgfPCdZU8bXmWL9@nostramo \
--to=michal.winiarski@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox