From: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>
To: Soham Purkait <soham.purkait@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, riana.tauro@intel.com,
anshuman.gupta@intel.com, aravind.iddamsetty@linux.intel.com,
badal.nilawar@intel.com, ravi.kishore.koppuravuri@intel.com,
mallesh.koujalagi@intel.com, andi.shyti@intel.com,
rodrigo.vivi@intel.com, anoop.c.vijay@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/1] drm/xe/xe_ras: Add RAS GPU health indicator
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2026 08:29:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <akyc5T18qi2FZiGb@black.igk.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260706165207.3773469-4-soham.purkait@intel.com>
On Mon, Jul 06, 2026 at 10:22:09PM +0530, Soham Purkait wrote:
> Add a sysfs interface that reports the current GPU health state and
> lets admin users and management tools update it but is readable by all
> users. Requests are routed through the sysctrl mailbox. The interface
> is present only on platforms that support the GPU health indicator.
>
> The interface is a single read/write file at the device level:
>
> $ cat /sys/.../device/gpu_health
> ok
>
> $ echo critical > /sys/.../device/gpu_health
>
> $ cat /sys/.../device/gpu_health
> critical
...
> +static const char * const gpu_health_states[] = {
> + [XE_RAS_HEALTH_STATUS_OK] = "ok",
> + [XE_RAS_HEALTH_STATUS_WARNING] = "warning",
> + [XE_RAS_HEALTH_STATUS_CRITICAL] = "critical"
'STATUS' is redundant and doesn't really add much to the meaning.
> +};
> +static_assert(ARRAY_SIZE(gpu_health_states) == XE_RAS_HEALTH_STATUS_MAX);
> +
> static u8 drm_to_xe_ras_severity(u8 severity)
> {
> switch (severity) {
> @@ -332,6 +339,150 @@ int xe_ras_clear_counter(struct xe_device *xe, u8 severity, u8 component)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static ssize_t gpu_health_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> +{
> + struct xe_ras_get_health_response response = {0};
> + struct xe_sysctrl_mailbox_command command = {0};
> + struct xe_ras_get_health_request request = {0};
> + struct xe_device *xe = kdev_to_xe_device(dev);
> + enum xe_ras_health_status health;
> + size_t rlen = 0;
Does this need initialization?
> + int ret;
> +
> + xe_sysctrl_create_command(&command, XE_SYSCTRL_GROUP_GFSP, XE_SYSCTRL_CMD_GET_HEALTH,
> + &request, sizeof(request), &response, sizeof(response));
> + guard(xe_pm_runtime)(xe);
> + ret = xe_sysctrl_send_command(&xe->sc, &command, &rlen);
> + if (ret) {
> + xe_err(xe, "sysctrl: failed to send get health command %d\n", ret);
Make this consistent with existing logs, "failed to get health".
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + if (rlen != sizeof(response)) {
> + xe_err(xe, "sysctrl: unexpected get health response length %zu (expected %zu)\n",
> + rlen, sizeof(response));
> + return -EIO;
> + }
> + if (response.current_health >= XE_RAS_HEALTH_STATUS_MAX) {
> + xe_err(xe, "sysctrl: invalid health state %u\n",
> + response.current_health);
> + return -EIO;
> + }
> +
> + health = (enum xe_ras_health_status)response.current_health;
Looking at below code, it's just used as an array index. So does this
need to be an enum?
> + xe_dbg(xe, "[RAS]: get health:%s\n", gpu_health_states[health]);
Nit: Add a blank space after ':'
> + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%s\n", gpu_health_states[health]);
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t gpu_health_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> + const char *buf, size_t count)
> +{
> + struct xe_ras_set_health_response response = {0};
> + struct xe_sysctrl_mailbox_command command = {0};
> + struct xe_ras_set_health_request request = {0};
> + struct xe_device *xe = kdev_to_xe_device(dev);
> + enum xe_ras_health_status health;
> + size_t rlen = 0;
Does this need initialization?
> + int ras_status;
> + int state;
> + int ret;
> +
> + state = sysfs_match_string(gpu_health_states, buf);
> + if (state < 0) {
> + xe_err(xe, "[RAS]: invalid health state '%.*s'\n",
> + (int)strcspn(buf, "\n"), buf);
Why do we need this log? Doesn't user already get an error?
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + request.new_health = (u8)state;
Is this cast needed? Doesn't this happen implicitly?
> + xe_sysctrl_create_command(&command, XE_SYSCTRL_GROUP_GFSP, XE_SYSCTRL_CMD_SET_HEALTH,
> + &request, sizeof(request), &response, sizeof(response));
> + guard(xe_pm_runtime)(xe);
> + ret = xe_sysctrl_send_command(&xe->sc, &command, &rlen);
> + if (ret) {
> + xe_err(xe, "sysctrl: failed to send set health command %d\n", ret);
Make this consistent with existing logs, "failed to set health".
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + if (rlen != sizeof(response)) {
> + xe_err(xe, "sysctrl: unexpected set health response length %zu (expected %zu)\n",
> + rlen, sizeof(response));
> + return -EIO;
> + }
> +
> + ras_status = ras_status_to_errno(response.status);
Why not reuse 'ret' here?
> + if (ras_status) {
> + xe_err(xe, "sysctrl: set health command failed with status %d\n",
Use '%#x' format.
> + response.status);
> + return ras_status;
> + }
> +
> + if (response.current_health >= XE_RAS_HEALTH_STATUS_MAX) {
> + xe_err(xe, "sysctrl: invalid health state %u\n",
> + response.current_health);
Does this need to be an error? Most likely the driver can't do much about
it anyway.
> + return -EIO;
> + }
> +
> + health = (enum xe_ras_health_status)response.current_health;
Same as above.
> + xe_dbg(xe, "[RAS]: set health:%s\n", gpu_health_states[health]);
Same as above.
> + return count;
> +}
> +
> +static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(gpu_health);
> +
> +static void gpu_health_sysfs_fini(void *arg)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = arg;
> +
> + device_remove_file(dev, &dev_attr_gpu_health);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * DOC: GPU Health Indicator
> + *
> + * On Intel Xe platforms that support the GPU health indicator interface,
> + * the driver exposes a sysfs attribute at the device level as:
> + *
> + * ``/sys/bus/pci/drivers/xe/<BDF>/gpu_health``
> + *
> + * Reading the attribute returns a single line containing the current GPU
> + * health state. Writing one of the valid values updates the same. Reads
> + * are available to all users; writes are restricted to administrative
> + * users only (attribute permissions ``0644``).
> + *
> + * The valid values for the GPU health state are:
> + *
> + * - ``ok``:
> + * The GPU is healthy and operating within normal parameters.
> + * - ``warning``:
> + * The GPU is experiencing minor issues but remains operational.
> + * - ``critical``:
> + * The GPU is in a critical state and may not be operational.
> + *
> + * See Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-intel-xe-ras for the ABI
> + * specification.
> + */
> +static int gpu_health_sysfs_init(struct xe_device *xe)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = xe->drm.dev;
> + int err;
> +
> + err = device_create_file(dev, &dev_attr_gpu_health);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> + err = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, gpu_health_sysfs_fini, dev);
Why not use devm_device_add_group() and do away with manual cleanup?
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * xe_ras_init - Initialize Xe RAS
> * @xe: xe device instance
> @@ -340,6 +491,8 @@ int xe_ras_clear_counter(struct xe_device *xe, u8 severity, u8 component)
> */
> void xe_ras_init(struct xe_device *xe)
> {
> + int ret;
> +
> if (!xe->info.has_drm_ras)
> return;
>
> @@ -350,4 +503,8 @@ void xe_ras_init(struct xe_device *xe)
>
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCIEAER))
> ras_usp_aer_init(xe);
> +
> + ret = gpu_health_sysfs_init(xe);
> + if (ret)
> + xe_err(xe, "[RAS]: failed to initialize GPU health sysfs, err=%d\n", ret);
Is '[RAS]' appropriate here? This is not coming from any hardware
component.
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ras_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ras_types.h
> index 6688e11f57a8..dac0e6d2270c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ras_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ras_types.h
> @@ -10,6 +10,21 @@
>
> #define XE_RAS_NUM_COUNTERS 16
>
> +/**
> + * enum xe_ras_health_status - gpu health status values
> + *
> + * @XE_RAS_HEALTH_STATUS_OK: gpu is healthy and operating normally.
> + * @XE_RAS_HEALTH_STATUS_WARNING: gpu has minor issues but is still operational.
> + * @XE_RAS_HEALTH_STATUS_CRITICAL: gpu is in a critical state and may not be operational.
> + * @XE_RAS_HEALTH_STATUS_MAX: Sentinel value for validation
> + */
> +enum xe_ras_health_status {
> + XE_RAS_HEALTH_STATUS_OK = 0,
> + XE_RAS_HEALTH_STATUS_WARNING,
> + XE_RAS_HEALTH_STATUS_CRITICAL,
> + XE_RAS_HEALTH_STATUS_MAX
> +};
> +
> /**
> * struct xe_ras_error_common - Error fields that are common across all products
> */
> @@ -121,4 +136,46 @@ struct xe_ras_clear_counter_response {
> /** @reserved1: Reserved for future use */
> u32 reserved1[3];
> } __packed;
> +
> +/**
> + * struct xe_ras_get_health_request - Request structure for obtaining gpu health
> + */
> +struct xe_ras_get_health_request {
> + /** @reserved: Reserved for future use. */
> + u32 reserved[2];
> +} __packed;
> +
> +/**
> + * struct xe_ras_get_health_response - Response structure for obtaining gpu health
> + */
> +struct xe_ras_get_health_response {
> + /** @current_health: Current gpu health, see &enum xe_ras_health_status */
> + u8 current_health;
It's already part of get_health structure, so can be just 'health'.
> + /** @reserved: Reserved for future use */
> + u8 reserved[3];
> +} __packed;
> +
> +/**
> + * struct xe_ras_set_health_request - Request structure for setting gpu health
> + */
> +struct xe_ras_set_health_request {
> + /** @new_health: New gpu health to set, see &enum xe_ras_health_status */
> + u8 new_health;
Ditto.
> + /** @reserved: Reserved for future use */
> + u8 reserved[3];
> +} __packed;
> +
> +/**
> + * struct xe_ras_set_health_response - Response structure for setting gpu health
> + */
> +struct xe_ras_set_health_response {
> + /** @status: Status of set health operation, see &enum xe_ras_response_status */
> + u32 status;
> + /** @current_health: Resulting current gpu health, see &enum xe_ras_health_status */
> + u8 current_health;
Ditto.
Raag
> + /** @reserved: Reserved for future use */
> + u8 reserved[3];
> + /** @reserved1: Reserved for future use */
> + u32 reserved1[2];
> +} __packed;
> #endif
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sysctrl_mailbox_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sysctrl_mailbox_types.h
> index 6e3753554510..d4da6e9ef774 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sysctrl_mailbox_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sysctrl_mailbox_types.h
> @@ -25,11 +25,15 @@ enum xe_sysctrl_group {
> * @XE_SYSCTRL_CMD_GET_COUNTER: Get error counter value
> * @XE_SYSCTRL_CMD_CLEAR_COUNTER: Clear error counter value
> * @XE_SYSCTRL_CMD_GET_PENDING_EVENT: Retrieve pending event
> + * @XE_SYSCTRL_CMD_GET_HEALTH: Retrieve current health status
> + * @XE_SYSCTRL_CMD_SET_HEALTH: Set new health status
> */
> enum xe_sysctrl_gfsp_cmd {
> XE_SYSCTRL_CMD_GET_COUNTER = 0x03,
> XE_SYSCTRL_CMD_CLEAR_COUNTER = 0x04,
> XE_SYSCTRL_CMD_GET_PENDING_EVENT = 0x07,
> + XE_SYSCTRL_CMD_GET_HEALTH = 0x0B,
> + XE_SYSCTRL_CMD_SET_HEALTH = 0x0C,
> };
>
> /**
> --
> 2.43.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-07 6:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-06 16:52 [PATCH v6 0/1] drm/xe: Add support for GPU health indicator Soham Purkait
2026-07-06 16:52 ` [PATCH v6 1/1] drm/xe/xe_ras: Add RAS " Soham Purkait
2026-07-07 6:29 ` Raag Jadav [this message]
2026-07-06 16:59 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/xe: Add support for " Patchwork
2026-07-06 17:00 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-07-06 17:42 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-07-06 20:57 ` ✓ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=akyc5T18qi2FZiGb@black.igk.intel.com \
--to=raag.jadav@intel.com \
--cc=andi.shyti@intel.com \
--cc=anoop.c.vijay@intel.com \
--cc=anshuman.gupta@intel.com \
--cc=aravind.iddamsetty@linux.intel.com \
--cc=badal.nilawar@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=mallesh.koujalagi@intel.com \
--cc=ravi.kishore.koppuravuri@intel.com \
--cc=riana.tauro@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=soham.purkait@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox