From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: Niranjana Vishwanathapura <niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>, <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] drm/xe: only resume exec queues that were actually suspended
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2026 13:33:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alAFo814/XafX/nQ@gsse-cloud1.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260701050730.1776476-8-niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com>
On Tue, Jun 30, 2026 at 10:07:29PM -0700, Niranjana Vishwanathapura wrote:
> A consumer-issued suspend() can fail (e.g. the queue is killed, banned
> or wedged), leaving the queue un-suspended. The consumer must then not
> issue the matching resume(): resuming a queue that was never suspended
> is incorrect.
>
> Add an lr.suspended flag to struct xe_exec_queue that records whether a
> consumer suspend() succeeded and a matching resume() is still owed. Set
> it on a successful suspend() in the preempt-fence path, clear it on
> resume(), and only resume queues that have it set.
>
> In resume_and_reinstall_preempt_fences() also skip queues that have
> since been reset/killed/banned/wedged: such a queue's suspend may not
> have completed (suspend_pending can still be set, e.g. a preempt fence
> signalled with -ENOENT without waiting), so resuming it would trip the
> !suspend_pending assert in the backend. Leave it marked suspended and
> let teardown resolve its state.
>
> A queue is only ever suspended by a single consumer at a time
> (preempt-fence mode and hw engine group fault mode are mutually
> exclusive), so a single flag is sufficient.
>
> Assisted-by: Github-Copilot:Claude-opus-4.8
> Signed-off-by: Niranjana Vishwanathapura <niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue_types.h | 12 ++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_preempt_fence.c | 7 +++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
> 3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue_types.h
> index d27ce24daae5..dbb2ee8eb5de 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue_types.h
> @@ -200,6 +200,18 @@ struct xe_exec_queue {
> u32 seqno;
> /** @lr.link: link into VM's list of exec queues */
> struct list_head link;
> + /**
> + * @lr.suspended: Tracks whether the consumer-issued suspend()
> + * succeeded and a matching resume() is still owed. suspend() can
> + * fail (e.g. killed/banned/wedged), leaving the queue
> + * un-suspended, so consumers must only resume() queues that were
> + * actually suspended. Set by the suspend caller on success and
> + * cleared by the resume caller. A queue is only ever suspended by
> + * a single consumer at a time (preempt-fence mode and hw engine
> + * group fault mode are mutually exclusive), so a single flag is
> + * sufficient.
> + */
> + bool suspended;
> } lr;
>
> #define XE_EXEC_QUEUE_TLB_INVAL_PRIMARY_GT 0
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_preempt_fence.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_preempt_fence.c
> index d6427b473ddd..4aa570fe745d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_preempt_fence.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_preempt_fence.c
> @@ -74,6 +74,13 @@ static bool preempt_fence_enable_signaling(struct dma_fence *fence)
> struct xe_exec_queue *q = pfence->q;
>
> pfence->error = q->ops->suspend(q);
> + /*
> + * Record a successful suspend so the rebind worker only resumes queues
> + * that were actually suspended; a failed suspend() leaves the queue
> + * un-suspended and must not be paired with a resume().
> + */
> + if (!pfence->error)
> + WRITE_ONCE(q->lr.suspended, true);
> queue_work(q->vm->xe->preempt_fence_wq, &pfence->preempt_work);
> return true;
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> index 080c2fff0e95..23f4a9fb9a49 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> @@ -206,7 +206,23 @@ static void resume_and_reinstall_preempt_fences(struct xe_vm *vm,
> xe_vm_assert_held(vm);
>
> list_for_each_entry(q, &vm->preempt.exec_queues, lr.link) {
> - q->ops->resume(q);
> + /*
> + * Only resume queues whose suspend() actually succeeded. A
> + * failed suspend() (e.g. killed/banned/wedged) leaves the queue
> + * un-suspended, so it must not be resumed.
> + *
> + * Also skip queues that have since been reset/killed/banned/
> + * wedged: their suspend may not have completed (suspend_pending
> + * can still be set, e.g. a preempt fence signalled with -ENOENT
> + * without waiting), so resuming would trip the !suspend_pending
> + * assert in the backend. Such queues are being torn down anyway,
> + * so leave them marked suspended and let teardown resolve their
> + * state.
> + */
> + if (READ_ONCE(q->lr.suspended) && !q->ops->reset_status(q)) {
> + WRITE_ONCE(q->lr.suspended, false);
> + q->ops->resume(q);
> + }
>
> drm_gpuvm_resv_add_fence(&vm->gpuvm, exec, q->lr.pfence,
> DMA_RESV_USAGE_BOOKKEEP, DMA_RESV_USAGE_BOOKKEEP);
> --
> 2.43.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-09 20:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-01 5:07 [PATCH v2 0/5] drm/xe: balance exec queue suspend/resume Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-07-01 5:07 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] drm/xe: only resume exec queues that were actually suspended Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-07-09 20:33 ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2026-07-01 5:07 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] drm/xe/hw_engine_group: propagate suspend failures during mode switch Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-07-09 20:20 ` Matthew Brost
2026-07-10 4:13 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-07-10 18:23 ` Matthew Brost
2026-07-01 5:07 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] drm/xe/guc: wait killably for suspend and ban queue on timeout Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-07-09 20:36 ` Matthew Brost
2026-07-09 20:40 ` Matthew Brost
2026-07-10 4:30 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-07-10 5:40 ` Matthew Brost
2026-07-01 5:07 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] drm/xe/guc: Add suspend refcount to exec queue ops Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-07-09 20:41 ` Matthew Brost
2026-07-01 5:07 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] drm/xe/multi_queue: preempt primary on queue group suspend Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-07-09 20:43 ` Matthew Brost
2026-07-01 5:14 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/xe: balance exec queue suspend/resume (rev4) Patchwork
2026-07-01 5:15 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-07-01 6:06 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-07-01 21:17 ` ✓ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alAFo814/XafX/nQ@gsse-cloud1.jf.intel.com \
--to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox