From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: Niranjana Vishwanathapura <niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>, <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/6] drm/xe/guc: add uninterruptible suspend wait for cross-process cleanup
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2026 09:17:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alUPsce7S3Kh+YY1@gsse-cloud1.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260713030005.2123322-11-niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com>
On Sun, Jul 12, 2026 at 08:00:07PM -0700, Niranjana Vishwanathapura wrote:
> Add a suspend_wait_blocking() exec queue op: an uninterruptible variant
> of suspend_wait() for callers that must complete a suspend on behalf of a
> queue that may belong to a different process than the calling task (e.g.
> cleanup/undo paths). An interruptible suspend_wait() returns -ERESTARTSYS
> when the calling task is signalled, which would leave the other process's
> queue suspended forever - a cross-process DoS.
>
> The blocking variant waits uninterruptibly and, on a genuine GuC timeout,
> bans and tears down the queue like suspend_wait() (shared via
> guc_exec_queue_suspend_timeout_ban()). It deliberately does not handle VF
> recovery since a blocking caller cannot retry.
>
> Assisted-by: Github-Copilot:Claude-opus-4.8
> Signed-off-by: Niranjana Vishwanathapura <niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue_types.h | 9 ++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_execlist.c | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 49 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue_types.h
> index dbb2ee8eb5de..0aa0823cbdaa 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue_types.h
> @@ -322,6 +322,15 @@ struct xe_exec_queue_ops {
> * avoidance mechanism.
> */
> int (*suspend_wait)(struct xe_exec_queue *q);
> + /**
> + * @suspend_wait_blocking: Like @suspend_wait, but waits uninterruptibly
> + * (does not abort on the calling task's signals). For cleanup/undo paths
> + * that must complete a suspend on behalf of a queue that may belong to a
> + * different process than the caller: a signal to the caller must not
> + * abandon the wait, which would leave the other process's queue
> + * suspended forever (cross-process DoS). A timeout bans like suspend_wait.
> + */
> + int (*suspend_wait_blocking)(struct xe_exec_queue *q);
> /**
> * @resume: Resume exec queue execution, exec queue must be in a suspended
> * state and dma fence returned from most recent suspend call must be
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_execlist.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_execlist.c
> index 6b86b4f9cc1c..cc33ae80e8cf 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_execlist.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_execlist.c
> @@ -468,6 +468,7 @@ static const struct xe_exec_queue_ops execlist_exec_queue_ops = {
> .set_preempt_timeout = execlist_exec_queue_set_preempt_timeout,
> .suspend = execlist_exec_queue_suspend,
> .suspend_wait = execlist_exec_queue_suspend_wait,
> + .suspend_wait_blocking = execlist_exec_queue_suspend_wait,
> .resume = execlist_exec_queue_resume,
> .reset_status = execlist_exec_queue_reset_status,
> };
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
> index 3ece51451f86..de9c131fc62d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
> @@ -2290,6 +2290,44 @@ static int guc_exec_queue_suspend_wait(struct xe_exec_queue *q)
> return ret < 0 ? ret : 0;
> }
>
> +static int guc_exec_queue_suspend_wait_blocking(struct xe_exec_queue *q)
> +{
> + struct xe_guc *guc = exec_queue_to_guc(q);
> + struct xe_device *xe = guc_to_xe(guc);
> + int ret;
> +
> + /*
> + * Uninterruptible variant of guc_exec_queue_suspend_wait() for callers
> + * that must complete the wait on behalf of a queue possibly owned by a
> + * different process (e.g. cleanup/undo paths). An interruptible wait
> + * could return -ERESTARTSYS if the calling task is signalled, leaving
> + * that queue suspended forever (cross-process DoS).
> + *
> + * A timeout is still a real per-queue fault, so it bans and cleans up
> + * like suspend_wait(). VF recovery is deliberately not handled (no
> + * -EAGAIN) since a blocking caller cannot retry.
> + */
> + q = xe_exec_queue_multi_queue_primary(q);
> +
> +#define WAIT_COND \
> + (!READ_ONCE(q->guc->suspend_pending) || exec_queue_killed(q) || \
> + xe_guc_read_stopped(guc))
> +
> + if (IS_SRIOV_VF(xe))
> + ret = wait_event_timeout(guc->ct.wq, WAIT_COND, HZ * 5);
> + else
> + ret = wait_event_timeout(q->guc->suspend_wait, WAIT_COND, HZ * 5);
> +
> +#undef WAIT_COND
> +
> + if (!ret) {
> + guc_exec_queue_suspend_timeout_ban(q);
> + return -ETIME;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static void guc_exec_queue_resume(struct xe_exec_queue *q)
> {
> struct xe_gpu_scheduler *sched = &q->guc->sched;
> @@ -2329,6 +2367,7 @@ static const struct xe_exec_queue_ops guc_exec_queue_ops = {
> .set_multi_queue_priority = guc_exec_queue_set_multi_queue_priority,
> .suspend = guc_exec_queue_suspend,
> .suspend_wait = guc_exec_queue_suspend_wait,
> + .suspend_wait_blocking = guc_exec_queue_suspend_wait_blocking,
> .resume = guc_exec_queue_resume,
> .reset_status = guc_exec_queue_reset_status,
> };
> --
> 2.43.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-13 16:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-13 3:00 [PATCH v4 0/6] drm/xe: balance exec queue suspend/resume Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-07-13 3:00 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] drm/xe: only resume exec queues that were actually suspended Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-07-13 3:00 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] drm/xe/guc: ban exec queue on suspend timeout Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-07-13 16:15 ` Matthew Brost
2026-07-13 3:00 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] drm/xe/guc: add uninterruptible suspend wait for cross-process cleanup Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-07-13 16:17 ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2026-07-13 3:00 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] drm/xe/hw_engine_group: propagate suspend failures during mode switch Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-07-13 16:20 ` Matthew Brost
2026-07-13 3:00 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] drm/xe/guc: Add suspend refcount to exec queue ops Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-07-13 3:00 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] drm/xe/multi_queue: preempt primary on queue group suspend Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-07-13 3:06 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/xe: balance exec queue suspend/resume (rev6) Patchwork
2026-07-13 3:07 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-07-13 3:43 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-07-13 4:52 ` ✓ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alUPsce7S3Kh+YY1@gsse-cloud1.jf.intel.com \
--to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox