From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Maarten Lankhorst <dev@lankhorst.se>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] drm/xe/display: Reserve the original GGTT space before creating a bo
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2026 17:28:37 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alo8FT1LfuwibrNC@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260715110557.2172095-4-dev@lankhorst.se>
On Wed, Jul 15, 2026 at 01:05:54PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Annotate the original area of the framebuffer as reserved in the GGTT
> before creating a new GGTT entry. This allows us to remove the
> range restrictions of GGTT in xe_bo_create_pin_map_at_novm().
>
> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <dev@lankhorst.se>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_initial_plane.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_initial_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_initial_plane.c
> index 0f86b73036d03..f49dda8e28255 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_initial_plane.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_initial_plane.c
> @@ -37,6 +37,25 @@ static bool need_pte_local(struct xe_device *xe)
> return IS_DGFX(xe) || has_lmembar(xe);
> }
>
> +static struct xe_ggtt_node *reserve_original_node(struct xe_ggtt *ggtt, u32 base, u32 size, u64 page_size)
> +{
> + u64 ggtt_start = xe_ggtt_start(ggtt), ggtt_end = ggtt_start + xe_ggtt_size(ggtt);
> +
> + /* Completely truncated? */
> + if (base + size <= ggtt_start || base >= ggtt_end)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + /* Partially truncated? */
> + if (base <= ggtt_start) {
> + size -= ggtt_start - base;
> + base = ggtt_start;
> + } else if (base + size >= ggtt_end) {
> + size = ggtt_end - base;
> + }
This is exactly what I didn't want to have in the display code.
These are xe_ggtt.c implementation details that we shouldn't
have to know. So IMO either xe_ggtt_insert_node_at() should handle
all of it, or this reserve_original_node() wrapper should live in
xe_ggtt.c.
> +
> + return xe_ggtt_insert_node_at(ggtt, size, page_size, base, base + size);
> +}
> +
> static struct xe_bo *
> initial_plane_bo(struct xe_device *xe,
> struct intel_initial_plane_config *plane_config)
> @@ -46,6 +65,7 @@ initial_plane_bo(struct xe_device *xe,
> resource_size_t phys_base;
> u32 base, size, flags;
> u64 page_size = xe->info.vram_flags & XE_VRAM_FLAGS_NEED64K ? SZ_64K : SZ_4K;
> + struct xe_ggtt_node *original_ggtt_node;
>
> if (plane_config->size == 0)
> return NULL;
> @@ -111,8 +131,15 @@ initial_plane_bo(struct xe_device *xe,
> }
> }
>
> + original_ggtt_node = reserve_original_node(tile0->mem.ggtt, base, size, page_size);
> + if (IS_ERR(original_ggtt_node))
> + return NULL;
> +
> bo = xe_bo_create_pin_map_at_novm(xe, tile0, size, phys_base,
> ttm_bo_type_kernel, flags, 0, false);
> + if (original_ggtt_node)
> + xe_ggtt_node_remove_noclear(original_ggtt_node);
> +
> if (IS_ERR(bo)) {
> drm_dbg_kms(&xe->drm,
> "Failed to create bo phys_base=%pa size %u with flags %x: %li\n",
> --
> 2.53.0
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-17 14:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-15 11:05 [PATCH v2 0/6] drm/xe: More BIOS FB takeover fixes Maarten Lankhorst
2026-07-15 11:05 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] drm/xe/ggtt: Add xe_ggtt_insert_node_at Maarten Lankhorst
2026-07-17 14:24 ` Ville Syrjälä
2026-07-15 11:05 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] drm/xe/ggtt: Add xe_ggtt_node_remove_noclear Maarten Lankhorst
2026-07-17 14:35 ` Ville Syrjälä
2026-07-15 11:05 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] drm/xe/display: Reserve the original GGTT space before creating a bo Maarten Lankhorst
2026-07-17 14:28 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2026-07-15 11:05 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] drm/xe/display: Use the correct calculation for phys_base on integrated Maarten Lankhorst
2026-07-15 11:05 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] drm/xe/display: Remove duplicated code Maarten Lankhorst
2026-07-15 11:34 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2026-07-17 14:46 ` Ville Syrjälä
2026-07-15 11:05 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] drm/xe/ggtt: Remove xe_ggtt_insert_bo_at Maarten Lankhorst
2026-07-17 14:34 ` Ville Syrjälä
2026-07-15 11:50 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/xe: More BIOS FB takeover fixes (rev2) Patchwork
2026-07-15 11:51 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-07-15 12:28 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-07-15 13:42 ` ✓ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alo8FT1LfuwibrNC@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dev@lankhorst.se \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox