From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: "Ruhl, Michael J" <michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>
Cc: "platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org"
<platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org>,
"intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"hansg@kernel.org" <hansg@kernel.org>,
"ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>,
"Vivi, Rodrigo" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
"thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com"
<thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
"airlied@gmail.com" <airlied@gmail.com>,
"simona@ffwll.ch" <simona@ffwll.ch>,
"david.e.box@linux.intel.com" <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>,
"Vijay, Anoop C" <anoop.c.vijay@intel.com>,
"Nilawar, Badal" <badal.nilawar@intel.com>,
"Roper, Matthew D" <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>,
"Ausmus, James" <james.ausmus@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] drm/xe/vsec: Crescent Island PMT callbacks
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2026 12:38:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <anY0KC6H0BTWh/Dp@gsse-cloud1.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <anYwa4ToCUncHAdc@gsse-cloud1.jf.intel.com>
On Fri, Aug 07, 2026 at 12:22:19PM -0700, Matthew Brost wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 07, 2026 at 08:00:40AM -0600, Ruhl, Michael J wrote:
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: Brost, Matthew <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> > >Sent: Thursday, August 6, 2026 5:50 PM
> > >To: Ruhl, Michael J <michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>
> > >Cc: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org; intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org;
> > >hansg@kernel.org; ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com; Vivi, Rodrigo
> > ><rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>; thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com;
> > >airlied@gmail.com; simona@ffwll.ch; david.e.box@linux.intel.com; Vijay,
> > >Anoop C <anoop.c.vijay@intel.com>; Nilawar, Badal
> > ><badal.nilawar@intel.com>; Roper, Matthew D <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>;
> > >Ausmus, James <james.ausmus@intel.com>
> > >Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] drm/xe/vsec: Crescent Island PMT callbacks
> > >
> > >On Thu, Aug 06, 2026 at 06:58:26AM -0700, Michael J. Ruhl wrote:
> > >> CRI PMT support requires callbacks to access the discovery status
> > >> and control areas. Access is a common MMIO area that requires an
> > >> index to be set before access is allowed.
> > >>
> > >> Introduce the necessary callbacks to get the status and control
> > >> information for CRI PMT usage.
> > >>
> > >> Add the glue logic to register the CRI PMT functionality.
> > >>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Michael J. Ruhl <michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>
> > >> ---
> > >> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vsec.c | 85
> > >++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > >> 1 file changed, 82 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > >>
> > >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vsec.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vsec.c
> > >> index 3849f99c1c91..b84ec9088de7 100644
> > >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vsec.c
> > >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vsec.c
> > >> @@ -320,17 +320,90 @@ int xe_pmt_telem_read(struct device *dev, u32
> > >guid, u64 *data, loff_t user_offse
> > >> return count;
> > >> }
> > >>
> > >> -static struct pmt_callbacks xe_pmt_cb = {
> > >> +/**
> > >> + * xe_pmt_read_reg() - read a crashlog register
> > >> + * @dev: the xe device that registered the callback
> > >> + * @guid: PMT guid of the crashlog instance
> > >> + * @reg: data read from the PMT data structure
> > >> + * @offset: which data to read from the PMT data structure
> > >> + *
> > >> + * Read the requested PMT register based on the pcie device and guid. The
> > >> + * supported struct is the Crashlog Type1 Version2.
> > >> + *
> > >> + * Currently this is for CRI only.
> > >> + */
> > >> +static int xe_pmt_read_reg(struct device *dev, u32 guid, u32 *reg, u32
> > >offset)
> > >> +{
> > >> + struct xe_device *xe = kdev_to_xe_device(dev);
> > >> + void __iomem *disc_addr = xe->mmio.regs;
> > >> + u32 inst;
> > >> +
> > >> + if (FIELD_GET(GUID_DEVICE_ID, guid) != CRI_DEVICE_ID ||
> > >> + FIELD_GET(GUID_CAP_TYPE, guid) != CRASHLOG)
> > >> + return -EINVAL;
> > >> +
> > >> + inst = FIELD_GET(GUID_RECORD_ID, guid) == PUNIT ?
> > >> + CRI_CRASHLOG_PUNIT_DISC_OFFSET :
> > >CRI_CRASHLOG_OOBMSM_DISC_OFFSET;
> > >> + disc_addr += CRI_DISCOVERY_OFFSET + inst + offset;
> > >> +
> > >> + guard(mutex)(&xe->pmt.lock);
> > >> +
> > >> + xe_pm_runtime_get(xe);
> > >
> > >We have guard(xe_pm_runtime)(xe), and this should also be the
> > >outermost construct (i.e., do not use xe_pm_runtime_get(), as it can
> > >wake the device, while other locks are held).
> >
> > Hi Matt,
> >
> > I am using the _get() routine because the device MUST be on for me to access the
> > registers.
> >
> > Does the guard(xe_pm_runtime)(xe) turn the device on?
> >
>
> Yes, it would be same as:
>
> xe_pm_runtime_get(xe);
> mutux_lock(&xe->pmt.lock);
> /* Do something *.
> mutux_unlock(&xe->pmt.lock);
> xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);
>
> >
> > >So this should either be:
> > >
> > >guard(xe_pm_runtime)(xe);
> > >guard(mutex)(&xe->pmt.lock);
> >
> > Ok, this makes sense.
> >
> > >Or, like the other in-tree usage with xe->pmt.lock in
> > >xe_pmt_telem_read(), which calls xe_pm_runtime_get_if_active() while
> > >holding the lock. This is fine because xe_pm_runtime_get_if_active()
> > >cannot wake the device. This is most likely the correct choice, given
> > >that this is a vfunc called by a different driver, and we have no way of
> > >knowing whether that driver is holding locks that could create
> > >problematic lock dependency chains if we wake the Xe device here.
> >
> > For telemetry, the data read should NOT happen if the device is not active (so the get_if_active usage)
> >
> > For Crashlog, I have to get the data and have to make sure the device is enabled....(see patch 3).
> >
>
> If Xe gets hotplugged nothing is going to save you here either, you to
> some extent you must deal errors at the caller, more below.
>
> > Do you have some thoughts on the correct sequencing here?
>
> I'd at least swap the order as suggested so that the Xe code isn't
> internally waking the device while holding locks, which goes against our
> PM rules.
>
> I'd also consider adding internal hotplug protection, unless the caller
> already provides it. I don't really know what the PMT code is doing
> here, so it's possible that this path is already protected against
> hotplug events.
>
> So:
>
> bound = drm_dev_enter(&xe->drm, idx);
> if (!bound)
Sorry typo with polarity inverted: s/if (!bound)/if (bound) {
> xe_pm_runtime_get(xe);
> mutux_lock(&xe->pmt.lock);
>
> /* Do something */
>
> mutux_unlock(&xe->pmt.lock);
> xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);
>
> drm_dev_exit(idx);
> } else {
> /* Device is already unplugged, caller has to deal with this */
> return some_error;
> }
>
> If hotplug protection is needed here, then xe_pmt_telem_read should have
> this too.
>
> Matt
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > M
> >
> > >Matt
> > >
> > >> +
> > >> + xe->soc_remapper.set_telem_region(xe, CRI_IDX_TELEM_DISCOVERY);
> > >> +
> > >> + memcpy_fromio(reg, disc_addr, sizeof(*reg));
> > >> +
> > >> + xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);
> > >> +
> > >> + return 0;
> > >> +}
> > >> +
> > >> +static int xe_pmt_write_reg(struct device *dev, u32 guid, u32 reg, u32
> > >offset)
> > >> +{
> > >> + struct xe_device *xe = kdev_to_xe_device(dev);
> > >> + void __iomem *disc_addr = xe->mmio.regs;
> > >> + u32 inst;
> > >> +
> > >> + if (FIELD_GET(GUID_DEVICE_ID, guid) != CRI_DEVICE_ID ||
> > >> + FIELD_GET(GUID_CAP_TYPE, guid) != CRASHLOG)
> > >> + return -EINVAL;
> > >> +
> > >> + inst = FIELD_GET(GUID_RECORD_ID, guid) == PUNIT ?
> > >> + CRI_CRASHLOG_PUNIT_DISC_OFFSET :
> > >CRI_CRASHLOG_OOBMSM_DISC_OFFSET;
> > >> + disc_addr += CRI_DISCOVERY_OFFSET + inst + offset;
> > >> +
> > >> + guard(mutex)(&xe->pmt.lock);
> > >> +
> > >> + xe_pm_runtime_get(xe);
> > >> +
> > >> + xe->soc_remapper.set_telem_region(xe, CRI_IDX_TELEM_DISCOVERY);
> > >> +
> > >> + memcpy_toio(disc_addr, ®, sizeof(reg));
> > >> +
> > >> + xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);
> > >> +
> > >> + return 0;
> > >> +}
> > >> +
> > >> +static struct pmt_callbacks xe_bmg_pmt_cb = {
> > >> + .read_telem = xe_pmt_telem_read,
> > >> +};
> > >> +
> > >> +static struct pmt_callbacks xe_cri_pmt_cb = {
> > >> .read_telem = xe_pmt_telem_read,
> > >> + .read_reg = xe_pmt_read_reg,
> > >> + .write_reg = xe_pmt_write_reg,
> > >> };
> > >>
> > >> static const int vsec_platforms[] = {
> > >> [XE_BATTLEMAGE] = XE_VSEC_BMG,
> > >> + [XE_CRESCENTISLAND] = XE_VSEC_CRI,
> > >> };
> > >>
> > >> static enum xe_vsec get_platform_info(struct xe_device *xe)
> > >> {
> > >> - if (xe->info.platform > XE_BATTLEMAGE)
> > >> + if (xe->info.platform > XE_CRESCENTISLAND)
> > >> return XE_VSEC_UNKNOWN;
> > >>
> > >> return vsec_platforms[xe->info.platform];
> > >> @@ -357,8 +430,14 @@ void xe_vsec_init(struct xe_device *xe)
> > >>
> > >> switch (platform) {
> > >> case XE_VSEC_BMG:
> > >> - info->priv_data = &xe_pmt_cb;
> > >> + info->priv_data = &xe_bmg_pmt_cb;
> > >> break;
> > >> +
> > >> + case XE_VSEC_CRI:
> > >> + info->priv_data = &xe_cri_pmt_cb;
> > >> + xe->soc_remapper.set_telem_region(xe,
> > >CRI_IDX_TELEM_DISCOVERY);
> > >> + break;
> > >> +
> > >> default:
> > >> break;
> > >> }
> > >> --
> > >> 2.43.0
> > >>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-07 19:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-06 13:58 [PATCH 0/7] Crescent Island PMT support Michael J. Ruhl
2026-08-06 13:58 ` [PATCH 1/7] platform/x86/intel/pmt: complete pcidev to device update Michael J. Ruhl
2026-08-06 13:58 ` [PATCH 2/7] platform/x86/intel/pmt: Add register access callbacks Michael J. Ruhl
2026-08-06 13:58 ` [PATCH 3/7] drm/xe/vsec: Use correct pm state get Michael J. Ruhl
2026-08-06 13:58 ` [PATCH 4/7] drm/xe/vsec: Support Crescent Island PMT Michael J. Ruhl
2026-08-06 13:58 ` [PATCH 5/7] drm/xe/vsec: Crescent Island PMT decode Michael J. Ruhl
2026-08-06 13:58 ` [PATCH 6/7] drm/xe/vsec: Crescent Island PMT callbacks Michael J. Ruhl
2026-08-06 21:50 ` Matthew Brost
2026-08-07 14:00 ` Ruhl, Michael J
2026-08-07 19:22 ` Matthew Brost
2026-08-07 19:38 ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2026-08-07 20:15 ` Ruhl, Michael J
2026-08-06 13:58 ` [PATCH 7/7] drm/xe/vsec: support late bind fw information Michael J. Ruhl
2026-08-06 14:18 ` [PATCH 0/7] Crescent Island PMT support Ruhl, Michael J
2026-08-06 14:51 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for Crescent Island PMT support (rev3) Patchwork
2026-08-06 15:29 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-08-07 2:37 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=anY0KC6H0BTWh/Dp@gsse-cloud1.jf.intel.com \
--to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=anoop.c.vijay@intel.com \
--cc=badal.nilawar@intel.com \
--cc=david.e.box@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hansg@kernel.org \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=james.ausmus@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--cc=michael.j.ruhl@intel.com \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox