From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: Niranjana Vishwanathapura <niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com>
Cc: Jagmeet Randhawa <jagmeet.randhawa@intel.com>,
<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/xe/guc: Fix race around q->guc->suspend_pending access
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2026 14:06:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aoTJOSrzjx1tiF9d@gsse-cloud1.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aoTGO2iyIgHK-QMd@nvishwa1-desk>
On Tue, Aug 18, 2026 at 01:53:15PM -0700, Niranjana Vishwanathapura wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2026 at 02:38:39AM +0800, Jagmeet Randhawa wrote:
> > q->guc->suspend_pending is accessed without any common lock.
> > __suspend_fence_signal(), called from guc_exec_queue_kill() and the
> > suspend-timeout ban path, clears the flag asynchronously. Meanwhile
> > handle_sched_done(), guc_exec_queue_stop() and
> > __guc_exec_queue_process_msg_suspend() check the flag and then call
> > suspend_fence_signal(), which asserts that it is still set.
> >
> > As the check and suspend_fence_signal() are not atomic, the clear can
> > land in between and trip the xe_gt_assert(q->guc->suspend_pending).
> >
> > The flag is already set and read under the per-queue msg_lock
> > (xe_sched_msg_lock()) on the suspend and resume paths. Extend that same
> > lock to the clear paths (kill and ban) and to the three check-then-act
> > sites so the check and the signal are atomic with respect to the clear.
> > In __guc_exec_queue_process_msg_suspend() only the non-sleeping branch is
> > wrapped, since the other branch waits. In handle_sched_done() the flag is
> > snapshotted under the lock and deregister_exec_queue() is kept outside it.
> >
> > v2: Document that sched->msg_lock also protects
> > guc->suspend_pending, which indicates a suspend message is in
> > flight, in addition to the sched->msgs list (Niranjana)
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jagmeet Randhawa <jagmeet.randhawa@intel.com>
>
> LGTM
> Reviewed-by: Niranjana Vishwanathapura <niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com>
>
So my latest reply, I don't think patch is needed in its current form.
Matt
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gpu_scheduler_types.h | 5 +++-
> > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_exec_queue_types.h | 5 +++-
> > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++----
> > 3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gpu_scheduler_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gpu_scheduler_types.h
> > index 63d9bf92583c..78ef2e8ded4f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gpu_scheduler_types.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gpu_scheduler_types.h
> > @@ -47,7 +47,10 @@ struct xe_gpu_scheduler {
> > const struct xe_sched_backend_ops *ops;
> > /** @msgs: list of messages to be processed in @work_process_msg */
> > struct list_head msgs;
> > - /** @msg_lock: Message lock */
> > + /**
> > + * @msg_lock: Protects @msgs and guc->suspend_pending (indicates a
> > + * suspend message is in flight) of exec queues on this scheduler.
> > + */
> > spinlock_t msg_lock;
> > /** @work_process_msg: processes messages */
> > struct work_struct work_process_msg;
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_exec_queue_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_exec_queue_types.h
> > index d27826b36649..74b711abe257 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_exec_queue_types.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_exec_queue_types.h
> > @@ -52,7 +52,10 @@ struct xe_guc_exec_queue {
> > u16 id;
> > /** @suspend_wait: wait queue used to wait on pending suspends */
> > wait_queue_head_t suspend_wait;
> > - /** @suspend_pending: a suspend of the exec_queue is pending */
> > + /**
> > + * @suspend_pending: a suspend of the exec_queue is pending.
> > + * Protected by @sched.msg_lock.
> > + */
> > bool suspend_pending;
> > /**
> > * @suspend_count: Reference count of active suspend requests. The
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
> > index 9036f89dff7d..c565c1d32d3a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
> > @@ -1928,9 +1928,13 @@ static void __guc_exec_queue_process_msg_suspend(struct xe_sched_msg *msg)
> > set_exec_queue_suspended(q);
> > disable_scheduling(q, false);
> > }
> > - } else if (q->guc->suspend_pending) {
> > - set_exec_queue_suspended(q);
> > - suspend_fence_signal(q);
> > + } else {
> > + xe_sched_msg_lock(&q->guc->sched);
> > + if (q->guc->suspend_pending) {
> > + set_exec_queue_suspended(q);
> > + suspend_fence_signal(q);
> > + }
> > + xe_sched_msg_unlock(&q->guc->sched);
> > }
> > }
> >
> > @@ -2130,7 +2134,9 @@ static void guc_exec_queue_kill(struct xe_exec_queue *q)
> > {
> > trace_xe_exec_queue_kill(q);
> > set_exec_queue_killed(q);
> > + xe_sched_msg_lock(&q->guc->sched);
> > __suspend_fence_signal(q);
> > + xe_sched_msg_unlock(&q->guc->sched);
> > xe_guc_exec_queue_trigger_cleanup(q);
> > }
> >
> > @@ -2392,11 +2398,15 @@ static void guc_exec_queue_suspend_timeout_ban(struct xe_exec_queue *q)
> > */
> > if (xe_exec_queue_is_multi_queue(q)) {
> > set_exec_queue_group_banned(q);
> > + xe_sched_msg_lock(&q->guc->sched);
> > __suspend_fence_signal(q);
> > + xe_sched_msg_unlock(&q->guc->sched);
> > xe_guc_exec_queue_group_trigger_cleanup(q);
> > } else {
> > set_exec_queue_banned(q);
> > + xe_sched_msg_lock(&q->guc->sched);
> > __suspend_fence_signal(q);
> > + xe_sched_msg_unlock(&q->guc->sched);
> > xe_guc_exec_queue_trigger_cleanup(q);
> > }
> > }
> > @@ -2614,10 +2624,12 @@ static void guc_exec_queue_stop(struct xe_guc *guc, struct xe_exec_queue *q)
> > if (exec_queue_destroyed(q))
> > do_destroy = true;
> > }
> > + xe_sched_msg_lock(sched);
> > if (q->guc->suspend_pending) {
> > set_exec_queue_suspended(q);
> > suspend_fence_signal(q);
> > }
> > + xe_sched_msg_unlock(sched);
> > atomic_and(EXEC_QUEUE_STATE_WEDGED | EXEC_QUEUE_STATE_BANNED |
> > EXEC_QUEUE_STATE_KILLED | EXEC_QUEUE_STATE_DESTROYED |
> > EXEC_QUEUE_STATE_SUSPENDED,
> > @@ -3222,13 +3234,20 @@ static void handle_sched_done(struct xe_guc *guc, struct xe_exec_queue *q,
> > smp_wmb();
> > wake_up_all(&guc->ct.wq);
> > } else {
> > + bool was_pending;
> > +
> > xe_gt_assert(guc_to_gt(guc), runnable_state == 0);
> > xe_gt_assert(guc_to_gt(guc), exec_queue_pending_disable(q));
> >
> > - if (q->guc->suspend_pending) {
> > + xe_sched_msg_lock(&q->guc->sched);
> > + was_pending = q->guc->suspend_pending;
> > + if (was_pending) {
> > clear_exec_queue_pending_disable(q);
> > suspend_fence_signal(q);
> > - } else {
> > + }
> > + xe_sched_msg_unlock(&q->guc->sched);
> > +
> > + if (!was_pending) {
> > if (exec_queue_banned(q)) {
> > smp_wmb();
> > wake_up_all(&guc->ct.wq);
> > --
> > 2.53.0
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-18 21:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-18 18:38 [PATCH v2] drm/xe/guc: Fix race around q->guc->suspend_pending access Jagmeet Randhawa
2026-08-18 18:45 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe/guc: Fix race around q->guc->suspend_pending access (rev2) Patchwork
2026-08-18 18:51 ` [PATCH v2] drm/xe/guc: Fix race around q->guc->suspend_pending access sashiko-bot
2026-08-18 20:54 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-08-18 19:32 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success for drm/xe/guc: Fix race around q->guc->suspend_pending access (rev2) Patchwork
2026-08-18 20:53 ` [PATCH v2] drm/xe/guc: Fix race around q->guc->suspend_pending access Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-08-18 21:06 ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2026-08-18 21:05 ` Matthew Brost
2026-08-18 23:27 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-08-19 1:01 ` Matthew Brost
2026-08-18 22:08 ` ✓ Xe.CI.FULL: success for drm/xe/guc: Fix race around q->guc->suspend_pending access (rev2) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aoTJOSrzjx1tiF9d@gsse-cloud1.jf.intel.com \
--to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jagmeet.randhawa@intel.com \
--cc=niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox