From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: Honglei Huang <honghuan@amd.com>
Cc: <sima@ffwll.ch>, <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
<thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
<himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>, <dakr@kernel.org>,
<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>, <aliceryhl@google.com>,
<Alexander.Deucher@amd.com>, <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>,
<Christian.Koenig@amd.com>, <Ray.Huang@amd.com>,
<Junhua.Shen@amd.com>, <amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] drm/gpusvm: let drm_gpusvm_get_pages() map an array of pages
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2026 12:57:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <apcuPwxjBs8HPv3x@gsse-cloud1.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260901090100.2024933-4-honghuan@amd.com>
On Tue, Sep 01, 2026 at 05:00:59PM +0800, Honglei Huang wrote:
> With the N:1 drm_gpusvm_pages layout, one CPU range mirrored on several
> drm_devices, the caller had to invoke get_pages() once per device and
> repeat the HMM fault every time.
>
> Make get_pages() take a contiguous array of drm_gpusvm_pages plus a
> count: fault once, then DMA map each instance by
> drm_gpusvm_dma_map_pages() under a single read_retry gate. xe range and
> userptr callers are updated.
>
> Document the N:1 array usage in the Overview, showing how get_pages()
> and drm_gpusvm_range_set_unmapped() take the whole array and its count
> while the unmap and free paths stay per-instance.
>
> Suggested-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Honglei Huang <honghuan@amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gpusvm.c | 141 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_userptr.c | 2 +-
> include/drm/drm_gpusvm.h | 1 +
> 4 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gpusvm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gpusvm.c
> index 89c3061d8ef..810f801a9f7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gpusvm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gpusvm.c
> @@ -80,6 +80,13 @@
> * };
> * };
> *
> + * static struct drm_gpusvm_pages *
> + * driver_pages(struct driver_range *drange)
> + * {
> + * return drange->num_pages == 1 ? &drange->inline_pages :
> + * drange->pages;
> + * }
> + *
> * In the N:1 case the driver allocates the pages array with a zeroing
> * allocator (e.g. kcalloc(num_pages, ...)), initialises each entry with
> * drm_gpusvm_init_pages(), and frees each entry with
> @@ -89,6 +96,28 @@
> * Each drm_gpusvm_pages must be zero-initialised and initialised with
> * drm_gpusvm_init_pages(), called once per entry.
> *
> + * The 1:1 examples below pass @num_pages == 1 and &drange->pages. In the
> + * N:1 case the driver instead passes the whole array and its count, so a
> + * single call faults the CPU range once and DMA maps it for every owning
> + * drm_device, e.g.:
> + *
> + * .. code-block:: c
> + *
> + * // GPU fault handler: one fault, one DMA mapping per device
> + * err = drm_gpusvm_get_pages(gpusvm, driver_pages(drange),
> + * drange->num_pages, gpusvm->mm,
> + * &range->notifier->notifier,
> + * drm_gpusvm_range_start(range),
> + * drm_gpusvm_range_end(range), &ctx);
> + *
> + * // Notifier callback: mark every instance unmapped in one call
> + * drm_gpusvm_range_set_unmapped(range, driver_pages(drange),
> + * drange->num_pages, mmu_range);
> + *
> + * The unmap and free paths stay per-instance: iterate @num_pages over
> + * driver_pages(drange) and call drm_gpusvm_unmap_pages() /
> + * drm_gpusvm_free_pages() for each entry.
> + *
> * - Operations:
> * Define the interface for driver-specific GPU SVM operations such as
> * range allocation, notifier allocation, and invalidations.
> @@ -232,7 +261,7 @@
> * goto retry;
> * }
> *
> - * err = drm_gpusvm_get_pages(gpusvm, &drange->pages,
> + * err = drm_gpusvm_get_pages(gpusvm, &drange->pages, 1,
> * gpusvm->mm, &range->notifier->notifier,
> * drm_gpusvm_range_start(range),
> * drm_gpusvm_range_end(range), &ctx);
> @@ -1417,25 +1446,34 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(drm_gpusvm_pages_valid);
> /**
> * drm_gpusvm_pages_valid_unlocked() - GPU SVM pages valid unlocked
> * @gpusvm: Pointer to the GPU SVM structure
> - * @svm_pages: Pointer to the GPU SVM pages structure
> + * @svm_pages: Array of GPU SVM pages structures
> + * @num_pages: Number of drm_gpusvm_pages instances in @svm_pages
> *
> - * This function determines if a GPU SVM pages are valid. Expected be called
> + * This function determines if every GPU SVM pages instance is valid, dropping
> + * the stale dma_addr array of any instance which is not. Expected be called
> * without holding gpusvm->notifier_lock.
> *
> - * Return: True if GPU SVM pages are valid, False otherwise
> + * Return: True if all GPU SVM pages are valid, False otherwise
> */
> static bool drm_gpusvm_pages_valid_unlocked(struct drm_gpusvm *gpusvm,
> - struct drm_gpusvm_pages *svm_pages)
> + struct drm_gpusvm_pages *svm_pages,
> + unsigned int num_pages)
> {
> - bool pages_valid;
> + bool pages_valid = true;
> + unsigned int p;
>
> - if (!svm_pages->dma_addr)
> - return false;
> + for (p = 0; p < num_pages; ++p) {
> + if (!svm_pages[p].dma_addr)
> + return false;
> + }
>
> drm_gpusvm_notifier_lock(gpusvm);
> - pages_valid = drm_gpusvm_pages_valid(gpusvm, svm_pages);
> - if (!pages_valid)
> - __drm_gpusvm_free_pages(gpusvm, svm_pages);
> + for (p = 0; p < num_pages; ++p) {
> + if (drm_gpusvm_pages_valid(gpusvm, &svm_pages[p]))
> + continue;
> + __drm_gpusvm_free_pages(gpusvm, &svm_pages[p]);
> + pages_valid = false;
> + }
> drm_gpusvm_notifier_unlock(gpusvm);
>
> return pages_valid;
> @@ -1451,8 +1489,9 @@ static bool drm_gpusvm_pages_valid_unlocked(struct drm_gpusvm *gpusvm,
> * @dma_dir: DMA data direction for the mappings
> *
> * Map the faulted @pfns into @svm_pages for DMA access through its owning
> - * drm_device. Must be called under the notifier lock. On failure this unwinds
> - * the partial mapping of this instance before returning.
> + * drm_device. Must be called under the notifier lock and only for an instance
> + * without a live mapping. On failure this unwinds the partial mapping of this
> + * instance before returning.
> *
> * Return: 0 on success, negative error code on failure.
> */
> @@ -1475,6 +1514,9 @@ static int drm_gpusvm_dma_map_pages(struct drm_gpusvm *gpusvm,
>
> lockdep_assert_held(&gpusvm->notifier_lock);
>
> + *state = (struct dma_iova_state){};
> + svm_pages->state_offset = 0;
> +
> flags.__flags = svm_pages->flags.__flags;
>
> for (i = 0, j = 0; i < npages; ++j) {
> @@ -1603,20 +1645,29 @@ static int drm_gpusvm_dma_map_pages(struct drm_gpusvm *gpusvm,
> /**
> * drm_gpusvm_get_pages() - Get pages and populate GPU SVM pages struct
> * @gpusvm: Pointer to the GPU SVM structure
> - * @svm_pages: The SVM pages to populate. This will contain the dma-addresses
> + * @svm_pages: Array of SVM pages instances to populate with dma addresses
> + * @num_pages: Number of drm_gpusvm_pages instances in @svm_pages
> * @mm: The mm corresponding to the CPU range
> * @notifier: The corresponding notifier for the given CPU range
> * @pages_start: Start CPU address for the pages
> * @pages_end: End CPU address for the pages (exclusive)
> * @ctx: GPU SVM context
> *
> - * This function gets and maps pages for CPU range and ensures they are
> - * mapped for DMA access.
> + * This function gets and maps pages for a CPU range and ensures they are
> + * mapped for DMA access. The HMM fault for the CPU range is performed once,
> + * the DMA mapping by drm_gpusvm_dma_map_pages() is then done per instance,
> + * one per owning drm_device. The retry against notifier races is kept here
> + * in common code so drivers never open code it.
> + * The common 1:1 case passes @num_pages == 1.
> + *
> + * On error the instances mapped before the failing one stay mapped, so the
> + * caller must unmap and free every instance regardless of the return value.
> *
> * Return: 0 on success, negative error code on failure.
> */
> int drm_gpusvm_get_pages(struct drm_gpusvm *gpusvm,
> struct drm_gpusvm_pages *svm_pages,
> + unsigned int num_pages,
> struct mm_struct *mm,
> struct mmu_interval_notifier *notifier,
> unsigned long pages_start, unsigned long pages_end,
> @@ -1638,9 +1689,11 @@ int drm_gpusvm_get_pages(struct drm_gpusvm *gpusvm,
> int err = 0;
> enum dma_data_direction dma_dir = ctx->read_only ? DMA_TO_DEVICE :
> DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL;
> + unsigned int p;
>
> - if (!svm_pages->drm)
> - return -EINVAL;
> + for (p = 0; p < num_pages; ++p)
> + if (!svm_pages[p].drm)
> + return -EINVAL;
>
> retry:
> remaining = timeout - jiffies;
> @@ -1649,7 +1702,8 @@ int drm_gpusvm_get_pages(struct drm_gpusvm *gpusvm,
> return -EBUSY;
>
> hmm_range.notifier_seq = mmu_interval_read_begin(notifier);
> - if (drm_gpusvm_pages_valid_unlocked(gpusvm, svm_pages))
> +
> + if (drm_gpusvm_pages_valid_unlocked(gpusvm, svm_pages, num_pages))
> goto set_seqno;
>
> pfns = kvmalloc_array(npages, sizeof(*pfns), GFP_KERNEL);
> @@ -1667,18 +1721,17 @@ int drm_gpusvm_get_pages(struct drm_gpusvm *gpusvm,
> if (err)
> goto err_free;
>
> - if (!svm_pages->dma_addr) {
> - svm_pages->dma_addr =
> - kvzalloc_objs(*svm_pages->dma_addr, npages);
> - if (!svm_pages->dma_addr) {
> + for (p = 0; p < num_pages; ++p) {
> + if (svm_pages[p].dma_addr)
> + continue;
> + svm_pages[p].dma_addr =
> + kvzalloc_objs(*svm_pages[p].dma_addr, npages);
> + if (!svm_pages[p].dma_addr) {
> err = -ENOMEM;
> goto err_free;
> }
> }
>
> - svm_pages->state = (struct dma_iova_state){};
> - svm_pages->state_offset = 0;
> -
> /*
> * Perform all dma mappings under the notifier lock to not
> * access freed pages. A notifier will either block on
> @@ -1686,10 +1739,12 @@ int drm_gpusvm_get_pages(struct drm_gpusvm *gpusvm,
> */
> drm_gpusvm_notifier_lock(gpusvm);
>
> - if (svm_pages->flags.unmapped) {
> - drm_gpusvm_notifier_unlock(gpusvm);
> - err = -EFAULT;
> - goto err_free;
> + for (p = 0; p < num_pages; ++p) {
> + if (svm_pages[p].flags.unmapped) {
> + drm_gpusvm_notifier_unlock(gpusvm);
> + err = -EFAULT;
> + goto err_free;
> + }
I believe, given how the notifiers work, that checking
`svm_pages[0].flags.unmapped` is actually sufficient. It's a
micro-optimization, so I'm fine with it either way.
> }
>
> if (mmu_interval_read_retry(notifier, hmm_range.notifier_seq)) {
> @@ -1698,15 +1753,29 @@ int drm_gpusvm_get_pages(struct drm_gpusvm *gpusvm,
> goto retry;
> }
>
> - err = drm_gpusvm_dma_map_pages(gpusvm, svm_pages, pfns, npages, ctx,
> - dma_dir);
> - drm_gpusvm_notifier_unlock(gpusvm);
> - if (err)
> - goto err_free;
> + for (p = 0; p < num_pages; ++p) {
> + if (drm_gpusvm_pages_valid(gpusvm, &svm_pages[p]))
> + continue;
>
> + err = drm_gpusvm_dma_map_pages(gpusvm, &svm_pages[p], pfns,
> + npages, ctx, dma_dir);
One thing that is different here is that if `drm_gpusvm_dma_map_pages()`
fails, say at `p == 1`, then `p[0]` will already contain valid DMA
mappings. I think this is actually fine, though, because the existing
cleanup paths will eventually release those mappings one way or another.
That said, it's probably worth confirming this through a code-path audit
and adding a comment here explaining why this is safe.
Again, Sashiko didn't run on this patch, and it would be good to get a
run before merging this series.
Matt
> + if (err) {
> + /*
> + * The failing instance was unwound by the helper. Keep
> + * the ones mapped earlier: the -EAGAIN retry reuses
> + * them, and the driver unmaps every instance with the
> + * range on the other error paths.
> + */
> + drm_gpusvm_notifier_unlock(gpusvm);
> + goto err_free;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + drm_gpusvm_notifier_unlock(gpusvm);
> kvfree(pfns);
> set_seqno:
> - svm_pages->notifier_seq = hmm_range.notifier_seq;
> + for (p = 0; p < num_pages; ++p)
> + svm_pages[p].notifier_seq = hmm_range.notifier_seq;
>
> return 0;
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.c
> index 627a741293d..1c7793d8caa 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.c
> @@ -1598,7 +1598,7 @@ int xe_svm_range_get_pages(struct xe_vm *vm, struct xe_svm_range *range,
>
> lockdep_assert_held(&range->lock);
>
> - err = drm_gpusvm_get_pages(&vm->svm.gpusvm, &range->pages,
> + err = drm_gpusvm_get_pages(&vm->svm.gpusvm, &range->pages, 1,
> vm->svm.gpusvm.mm,
> &range->base.notifier->notifier,
> drm_gpusvm_range_start(&range->base),
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_userptr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_userptr.c
> index 90ac141fc12..9c1dac0fce6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_userptr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_userptr.c
> @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ int xe_vma_userptr_pin_pages(struct xe_userptr_vma *uvma)
> if (vma->gpuva.flags & XE_VMA_DESTROYED)
> return 0;
>
> - return drm_gpusvm_get_pages(&vm->svm.gpusvm, &uvma->userptr.pages,
> + return drm_gpusvm_get_pages(&vm->svm.gpusvm, &uvma->userptr.pages, 1,
> uvma->userptr.notifier.mm,
> &uvma->userptr.notifier,
> xe_vma_userptr(vma),
> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_gpusvm.h b/include/drm/drm_gpusvm.h
> index b7d987bf76a..d2b6f3d2b84 100644
> --- a/include/drm/drm_gpusvm.h
> +++ b/include/drm/drm_gpusvm.h
> @@ -324,6 +324,7 @@ void drm_gpusvm_range_set_unmapped(struct drm_gpusvm_range *range,
>
> int drm_gpusvm_get_pages(struct drm_gpusvm *gpusvm,
> struct drm_gpusvm_pages *svm_pages,
> + unsigned int num_pages,
> struct mm_struct *mm,
> struct mmu_interval_notifier *notifier,
> unsigned long pages_start, unsigned long pages_end,
> --
> 2.34.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-01 19:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-01 9:00 [PATCH v2 0/4] drm/gpusvm: share one HMM fault across per-device DMA mappings Honglei Huang
2026-09-01 9:00 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] drm/gpusvm: move dma_addr allocation before the notifier lock Honglei Huang
2026-09-01 19:39 ` Matthew Brost
2026-09-02 6:21 ` Huang, Honglei
2026-09-01 9:00 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] drm/gpusvm: extract drm_gpusvm_dma_map_pages() helper Honglei Huang
2026-09-01 19:43 ` Matthew Brost
2026-09-02 6:22 ` Huang, Honglei
2026-09-01 9:00 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] drm/gpusvm: let drm_gpusvm_get_pages() map an array of pages Honglei Huang
2026-09-01 19:57 ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2026-09-02 6:39 ` Huang, Honglei
2026-09-01 9:01 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] drm/gpusvm: make the DMA mapping step in get_pages() optional Honglei Huang
2026-09-01 20:02 ` Matthew Brost
2026-09-01 9:09 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/gpusvm: share one HMM fault across per-device DMA mappings (rev2) Patchwork
2026-09-01 10:04 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-09-01 10:52 ` ✓ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=apcuPwxjBs8HPv3x@gsse-cloud1.jf.intel.com \
--to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=Alexander.Deucher@amd.com \
--cc=Christian.Koenig@amd.com \
--cc=Felix.Kuehling@amd.com \
--cc=Junhua.Shen@amd.com \
--cc=Ray.Huang@amd.com \
--cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com \
--cc=honghuan@amd.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=sima@ffwll.ch \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox