Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: "Tales A. Mendonça" <talesam@gmail.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	<daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>, <stuart.summers@intel.com>,
	<julia.filipchuk@intel.com>, <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
	<rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>, <jani.nikula@intel.com>,
	<navonjohnlukose@gmail.com>, <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] drm/xe: Log when a timed out TLB invalidation ack finally arrives
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2026 15:06:25 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aq214e+ia3nHVrKB@gsse-cloud1.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260917163553.1742580-3-talesam@gmail.com>

On Thu, Sep 17, 2026 at 01:35:52PM -0300, Tales A. Mendonça wrote:
> When a TLB invalidation fence times out we log the timeout, but if the
> ack for that seqno later shows up there is no record of it, making it
> impossible to tell from logs whether the ack was lost forever or merely
> (very) late.
> 
> Track the most recent timed out seqno and log how late its ack arrives,
> relative to both the original request and the moment the fence was
> signaled with -ETIME.
> 
> On ARL with GuC 70.53.0 this shows the acks are never lost: they
> consistently arrive ~2.3s after the request, tens of milliseconds after
> the TDR has already signaled the fence:
> 
>   TLB invalidation fence timeout, seqno=10992 recv=10991
>   TLB invalidation late ack: seqno=10992 recv=10992,
>     request-to-ack=2314ms, timeout-to-ack=45ms
> 
> Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/-/work_items/8678
> Signed-off-by: Tales A. Mendonça <talesam@gmail.com>

I would give this an RB but my colleagues have done a bunch of work on
SIGID and I haven't been involved at all, so I need some help here.

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_tlb_inval.c       | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_tlb_inval_types.h | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 36 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_tlb_inval.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_tlb_inval.c
> index 7a0c04fac60..7047a347551 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_tlb_inval.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_tlb_inval.c
> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
>  #include "xe_guc_tlb_inval.h"
>  #include "xe_mmio.h"
>  #include "xe_pm.h"
> +#include "xe_printk.h"
>  #include "xe_tlb_inval.h"
>  #include "xe_trace.h"
>  
> @@ -99,6 +100,11 @@ static void xe_tlb_inval_fence_timeout(struct work_struct *work)
>  			fence->seqno, tlb_inval->seqno_recv);
>  
>  		timedout_seqno = fence->seqno;
> +		if (!tlb_inval->timedout_seqno) {
> +			tlb_inval->timedout_seqno = fence->seqno;
> +			tlb_inval->timedout_inval_time = fence->inval_time;
> +			tlb_inval->timedout_time = ktime_get();
> +		}
>  
>  		fence->base.error = -ETIME;
>  		xe_tlb_inval_fence_signal(fence);
> @@ -227,6 +233,7 @@ void xe_tlb_inval_reset(struct xe_tlb_inval *tlb_inval)
>  	else
>  		pending_seqno = tlb_inval->seqno - 1;
>  	WRITE_ONCE(tlb_inval->seqno_recv, pending_seqno);
> +	tlb_inval->timedout_seqno = 0;
>  
>  	list_for_each_entry_safe(fence, next,
>  				 &tlb_inval->pending_fences, link)
> @@ -454,6 +461,18 @@ void xe_tlb_inval_done_handler(struct xe_tlb_inval *tlb_inval, int seqno)
>  
>  	WRITE_ONCE(tlb_inval->seqno_recv, seqno);
>  
> +	if (tlb_inval->timedout_seqno &&
> +	    xe_tlb_inval_seqno_past(tlb_inval, tlb_inval->timedout_seqno)) {
> +		ktime_t now = ktime_get();
> +
> +		xe_warn(xe,
> +			"TLB invalidation late ack: seqno=%d recv=%d, request-to-ack=%lldms, timeout-to-ack=%lldms",
> +			tlb_inval->timedout_seqno, seqno,
> +			ktime_ms_delta(now, tlb_inval->timedout_inval_time),
> +			ktime_ms_delta(now, tlb_inval->timedout_time));

Should this be some type SIGID message?

Matt

> +		tlb_inval->timedout_seqno = 0;
> +	}
> +
>  	list_for_each_entry_safe(fence, next,
>  				 &tlb_inval->pending_fences, link) {
>  		trace_xe_tlb_inval_fence_recv(xe, fence);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_tlb_inval_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_tlb_inval_types.h
> index d77be1aedc9..80d2019fa20 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_tlb_inval_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_tlb_inval_types.h
> @@ -112,6 +112,23 @@ struct xe_tlb_inval {
>  	 * @pending_lock: protects @pending_fences and updating @seqno_recv.
>  	 */
>  	spinlock_t pending_lock;
> +	/**
> +	 * @timedout_seqno: seqno of the most recent timed out TLB
> +	 * invalidation, 0 if none. Used to measure how late the ack for a
> +	 * timed out invalidation actually arrives. Protected by
> +	 * @pending_lock.
> +	 */
> +	int timedout_seqno;
> +	/**
> +	 * @timedout_inval_time: request time of @timedout_seqno. Protected by
> +	 * @pending_lock.
> +	 */
> +	ktime_t timedout_inval_time;
> +	/**
> +	 * @timedout_time: time @timedout_seqno was signaled with -ETIME.
> +	 * Protected by @pending_lock.
> +	 */
> +	ktime_t timedout_time;
>  	/**
>  	 * @fence_tdr: schedules a delayed call to xe_tlb_fence_timeout after
>  	 * the timeout interval is over.
> -- 
> 2.55.0
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-18 22:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-17 16:35 [PATCH v4 0/3] drm/xe: fix GuC TLB invalidation ack stalls on ARL (Wa_22016122933) Tales A. Mendonça
2026-09-17 16:35 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] drm/xe: Capture devcoredump on TLB invalidation timeout Tales A. Mendonça
2026-09-17 16:50   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-17 23:18     ` Tales A. Mendonça
2026-09-18 22:01   ` Matthew Brost
2026-09-21 18:06     ` Tales A. Mendonça
2026-09-17 16:35 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] drm/xe: Log when a timed out TLB invalidation ack finally arrives Tales A. Mendonça
2026-09-18 22:06   ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2026-09-21  5:30     ` Matthew Brost
2026-09-21 18:10       ` Tales A. Mendonça
2026-09-21 18:19         ` Matthew Brost
2026-09-17 16:35 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] drm/xe: Implement Wa_22016122933 Tales A. Mendonça
2026-09-17 16:42 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/xe: fix GuC TLB invalidation ack stalls on ARL (Wa_22016122933) (rev3) Patchwork
2026-09-17 16:44 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-09-17 17:54 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-09-17 18:45 ` ✓ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aq214e+ia3nHVrKB@gsse-cloud1.jf.intel.com \
    --to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    --cc=julia.filipchuk@intel.com \
    --cc=navonjohnlukose@gmail.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=stuart.summers@intel.com \
    --cc=talesam@gmail.com \
    --cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox