From: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>
To: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, badal.nilawar@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] drm/xe/i2c: Disable IRQ on unbind
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2026 14:12:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aqPwMmbvsY0_-37n@black.igk.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aqPjOgEgFG04B_ef@black.igk.intel.com>
On Fri, Sep 11, 2026 at 01:17:14PM +0200, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2026 at 10:10:21AM +0530, Raag Jadav wrote:
> > Currently, struct xe_i2c is freed before SGUnit IRQ is disabled, leaving
> > a potential UAF in case the IRQ is hit in that small window. Explicitly
> > disable I2C IRQ as part of xe_i2c_remove() and fix this.
> >
> > Fixes: 0bb78ce09926 ("drm/xe/i2c: Wire up reset/postinstall for I2C IRQ")
> > Signed-off-by: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>
>
> FWIW:
>
> Reviewed-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
Thanks Heikki. I think I missed cleaning up the i2c dangling pointer here,
let me send out a v2.
Raag
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_i2c.c | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_i2c.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_i2c.c
> > index d8fa68206f41..82b22c5412ba 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_i2c.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_i2c.c
> > @@ -324,8 +324,10 @@ void xe_i2c_pm_resume(struct xe_device *xe, bool d3cold)
> > static void xe_i2c_remove(void *data)
> > {
> > struct xe_i2c *i2c = data;
> > + struct xe_device *xe = tile_to_xe(i2c->mmio->tile);
> > unsigned int i;
> >
> > + xe_i2c_irq_reset(xe);
> > xe_amc_exit(i2c);
> >
> > for (i = 0; i < XE_I2C_MAX_CLIENTS; i++) {
> > --
> > 2.43.0
>
> --
> heikki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-11 12:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-11 4:40 [PATCH v1] drm/xe/i2c: Disable IRQ on unbind Raag Jadav
2026-09-11 4:54 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 5:02 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for " Patchwork
2026-09-11 5:40 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-09-11 11:17 ` [PATCH v1] " Heikki Krogerus
2026-09-11 12:12 ` Raag Jadav [this message]
2026-09-11 13:30 ` ✓ Xe.CI.FULL: success for " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aqPwMmbvsY0_-37n@black.igk.intel.com \
--to=raag.jadav@intel.com \
--cc=badal.nilawar@intel.com \
--cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox