From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] drm/xe: Bump prefetch BO LRU via GPUSVM devmem callback
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2026 21:06:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ar3cOOtIjX8wWWr6@gsse-cloud1.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261001033602.3166274-9-himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
On Thu, Oct 01, 2026 at 09:06:06AM +0530, Himal Prasad Ghimiray wrote:
> Add xe_svm_devmem_lru_bump() and set it as drm_gpusvm_ctx.devmem_fn in
> the prefetch worker so each backing BO is moved to the LRU tail during
> get_pages.
>
> v2:
> - Guard xe_svm_devmem_lru_bump() against foreign device-memory
> allocations before casting to xe_bo: return early when
> devmem_allocation->ops != &dpagemap_devmem_ops. A shared
> device_private_page_owner can hand us another driver's allocation.
> (Matthew Brost / Sashiko AI review)
> - Add stub for function (CI)
>
> v3:
> - Guard xe_svm_devmem_lru_bump() body with CONFIG_DRM_XE_PAGEMAP; it
> references dpagemap_devmem_ops and to_xe_bo(), which only exist when
> PAGEMAP is enabled. Fixes the build with GPUSVM=y, PAGEMAP=n.
> (Sashiko AI review)
>
> v4:
> - Fix xe_svm_devmem_lru_bump() kernel-doc to explain the locking (Matt)
>
> Suggested-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Sashiko comment for series are theoretically possible with different
coherent devicesm one of which uses GPUSVM, another of which does not
but I don't think we need to solve theoretical problem today, nor is
this in scope.
Himal - go ahead and merge, ack on doing this through drm-xe-next.
Matt
> Signed-off-by: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.h | 7 +++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 42 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.c
> index f39e647512ad..d07dd95ab451 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.c
> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
> #include <drm/drm_managed.h>
> #include <drm/drm_pagemap.h>
> #include <drm/drm_pagemap_util.h>
> +#include <drm/ttm/ttm_bo.h>
>
> #include "xe_bo.h"
> #include "xe_exec_queue_types.h"
> @@ -1625,6 +1626,39 @@ int xe_svm_range_get_pages(struct xe_vm *vm, struct xe_svm_range *range,
> return err;
> }
>
> +/**
> + * xe_svm_devmem_lru_bump() - Move a range's backing BO to the TTM LRU tail
> + * @devmem_allocation: The device-memory allocation backing the range's pages
> + *
> + * Intended as a &drm_gpusvm_ctx.devmem_fn, so drm_gpusvm_get_pages() calls it
> + * under the GPUSVM notifier lock. That lock sits in the reclaim path, so
> + * dma-resv cannot be acquired blocking beneath it; dma-resv is also the outer
> + * lock of the notifier when memory is allocated and migrated, so a blocking
> + * acquire here would invert that order. Hence the trylock. The BO is private
> + * (dedicated dma-resv), so the trylock succeeds unless the BO is being moved
> + * elsewhere (e.g. eviction); a contended BO is simply skipped.
> + *
> + * A shared device_private_page_owner can hand us allocations backed by a
> + * foreign driver; skip anything that is not an Xe BO before casting.
> + */
> +void xe_svm_devmem_lru_bump(struct drm_pagemap_devmem *devmem_allocation)
> +{
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_XE_PAGEMAP)
> + struct xe_bo *bo;
> +
> + if (devmem_allocation->ops != &dpagemap_devmem_ops)
> + return;
> +
> + bo = to_xe_bo(devmem_allocation);
> +
> + if (!dma_resv_trylock(bo->ttm.base.resv))
> + return;
> +
> + ttm_bo_move_to_lru_tail_unlocked(&bo->ttm);
> + dma_resv_unlock(bo->ttm.base.resv);
> +#endif
> +}
> +
> /**
> * xe_svm_ranges_zap_ptes_in_range - clear ptes of svm ranges in input range
> * @vm: Pointer to the xe_vm structure
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.h
> index 2ef4ef026ccd..585ad64b672b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.h
> @@ -128,6 +128,8 @@ struct xe_svm_range *xe_svm_range_find_or_insert(struct xe_vm *vm, u64 addr,
> int xe_svm_range_get_pages(struct xe_vm *vm, struct xe_svm_range *range,
> struct drm_gpusvm_ctx *ctx);
>
> +void xe_svm_devmem_lru_bump(struct drm_pagemap_devmem *devmem_allocation);
> +
> bool xe_svm_range_needs_migrate_to_vram(struct xe_svm_range *range, struct xe_vma *vma,
> const struct drm_pagemap *dpagemap);
>
> @@ -356,6 +358,11 @@ int xe_svm_range_get_pages(struct xe_vm *vm, struct xe_svm_range *range,
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> +static inline
> +void xe_svm_devmem_lru_bump(struct drm_pagemap_devmem *devmem_allocation)
> +{
> +}
> +
> static inline struct xe_svm_range *to_xe_range(struct drm_gpusvm_range *r)
> {
> return NULL;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> index ea5bfb307db1..986e0ebfdacd 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> @@ -3246,6 +3246,7 @@ static int prefetch_ranges(struct xe_vm *vm, struct xe_vma_ops *vops,
> ctx.devmem_possible = devmem_possible;
> ctx.check_pages_threshold = devmem_possible ? SZ_64K : 0;
> ctx.device_private_page_owner = xe_svm_private_page_owner(vm, !dpagemap);
> + ctx.devmem_fn = xe_svm_devmem_lru_bump;
>
> skip_threads = op->prefetch_range.ranges_count == 1 ||
> (!dpagemap && !(vops->flags &
> --
> 2.43.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-01 4:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-01 3:36 [PATCH v4 0/4] Refresh TTM LRU on SVM prefetch Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2026-10-01 3:36 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] drm/pagemap: Add helper to access backing devmem allocation Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2026-10-01 3:36 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] drm/gpusvm: Add devmem callback to get_pages Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2026-10-01 3:36 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] drm/xe: Bump prefetch BO LRU via GPUSVM devmem callback Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2026-10-01 3:49 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-01 4:06 ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2026-10-01 5:18 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2026-10-01 3:36 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] drm/xe: Bump prefetch BO LRU for already-valid ranges Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2026-10-01 3:47 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-01 3:40 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for Refresh TTM LRU on SVM prefetch (rev5) Patchwork
2026-10-01 6:35 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-10-01 11:41 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ar3cOOtIjX8wWWr6@gsse-cloud1.jf.intel.com \
--to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox