From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: <sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev>
Cc: Daniel Charles <daniel.charles@intel.com>,
<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] drm/xe: Synchronously wait for queue kill on FD close
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2026 20:07:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <as2gZomTraTJsZNh@gsse-cloud1.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <sashiko-outbox-168881@kernel.org>
On Tue, Oct 13, 2026 at 02:59:42AM +0000, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
> - [High] drm/xe: Infinite wait in guc_exec_queue_kill_sync() if GuC hangs
> - [High] xe: missing queue kill synchronization in teardown paths
> --
>
> commit 85f52ae759a601199a902ba124e22498f6e78a14
> Author: Daniel Charles <daniel.charles@intel.com>
>
> drm/xe: Synchronously wait for queue kill on FD close
>
> The early KILL message disables GuC scheduling outside the serialized
> TDR path, but xe_file_close() does not wait for it to complete before
> dropping queue references. Split FD close teardown into two passes:
> first kill every queue, then wait using xe_exec_queue_kill_sync().
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue.c
> > index 7ade915c59a85..af5d9e8f0b16e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue.c
> [ ... ]
> > @@ -1623,6 +1623,19 @@ void xe_exec_queue_kill(struct xe_exec_queue *q)
> > +/**
> > + * xe_exec_queue_kill_sync() - Wait for queue scheduling to stop
> > + * @q: The exec queue
> > + *
> > + * This function waits for the backend to finish stopping the queue after
> > + * xe_exec_queue_kill(). It is safe to call multiple times.
> > + */
> > +void xe_exec_queue_kill_sync(struct xe_exec_queue *q)
> > +{
> > + if (q->ops->kill_sync)
> > + q->ops->kill_sync(q);
> > +}
>
> [Severity: High]
> Does this code leave other teardown paths vulnerable to CAT errors?
>
> While xe_file_close() was updated to use this new sync function, it appears
> xe_exec_queue_destroy_ioctl() and xe_vm_close_and_put() both still call
> xe_exec_queue_kill() followed immediately by xe_exec_queue_put() without
> waiting.
>
> If userspace destroys a user queue and then destroys its VM,
> xe_vm_close_and_put() synchronously destroys the VM's page tables while GuC
> is still actively scheduling the queue. Similarly, for the internal kernel
> bind queue (vm->q), xe_vm_close_and_put() kills it and proceeds to destroy
> the page tables. This results in GuC scheduling contexts with torn-down
> page tables, causing IOMMU CAT errors and unrecoverable engine resets.
>
I think we assume aside from an unexpected file close (segfault on user
app, ctrl-c), a user shall be well behavied (it is) and at worst it
spams dmesgs on debug levels.
> [ ... ]
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
> > index 609af66b343d5..36c8c3766f5fa 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
> [ ... ]
> > +static void guc_exec_queue_kill_sync(struct xe_exec_queue *q)
> > +{
> [ ... ]
> > + wait_event(guc->ct.wq,
> > + (!exec_queue_enabled(primary) &&
> > + !exec_queue_pending_disable(primary) &&
> > + !exec_queue_pending_enable(primary)) ||
> > + xe_guc_read_stopped(guc) ||
> > + vf_recovery(guc) ||
> > + exec_queue_wedged(primary));
> > +}
>
> [Severity: High]
> Can this wait hang forever if the GuC firmware silently drops the H2G DISABLE
> message or hangs without triggering a global watchdog wedge?
>
This is right, would have a reasonable timeout even though eventually a
GT reset pops us out here if the GuC stops responding.
Matt
> If called on an idle queue (no pending jobs), the Time-out Driven Recovery
> (TDR) will not fire. xe_sched_tdr_queue_imm() calls
> drm_sched_tdr_queue_imm(), which only schedules the timeout worker if there
> are pending jobs. Even if the worker runs, drm_sched_job_timedout() exits
> early if the pending list is empty.
>
> Since this uses an unbounded wait_event() without a timeout, it could cause
> the close() syscall to hang forever in uninterruptible sleep (D state),
> leading to an unkillable process. Other functions like enable_scheduling()
> and disable_scheduling_deregister() use wait_event_timeout() and manually
> trigger xe_gt_reset_async() on timeout to prevent this.
>
> --
> Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261013023442.206915-1-daniel.charles@intel.com?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-13 3:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-13 2:34 [PATCH 0/3] FD close cleanup for XE Daniel Charles
2026-10-13 2:34 ` [PATCH 1/3] drm/xe: Read scheduler message opcode under lock Daniel Charles
2026-10-13 3:00 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 3:09 ` Matthew Brost
2026-10-13 2:34 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/xe: Disable scheduling early on FD close to avoid CAT error cascade Daniel Charles
2026-10-13 14:46 ` Cavitt, Jonathan
2026-10-13 2:34 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/xe: Synchronously wait for queue kill on FD close Daniel Charles
2026-10-13 2:59 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 3:07 ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2026-10-13 3:17 ` Matthew Brost
2026-10-13 18:11 ` Daniel Charles
2026-10-13 18:31 ` Matthew Brost
2026-10-13 2:54 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for FD close cleanup for XE Patchwork
2026-10-13 2:56 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-10-13 6:19 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-10-13 15:32 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=as2gZomTraTJsZNh@gsse-cloud1.jf.intel.com \
--to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=daniel.charles@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox