Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Stuart Summers <stuart.summers@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>, <riana.tauro@intel.com>,
	<anoop.c.vijay@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] drm/xe: Process device OOB workarounds during early info init
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2026 14:57:38 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <avTIsmNyx96rMfWP@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261104215353.234314-7-stuart.summers@intel.com>

On Wed, Nov 04, 2026 at 09:53:55PM +0000, Stuart Summers wrote:
> Device OOB workarounds only match on platform, subplatform and platform
> step, all of which are known once xe_info_init_early() has copied them
> out of the device descriptor. Processing them there instead of in
> xe_device_probe_early() makes XE_DEVICE_WA() usable for the rest of
> early probe, which runs before xe_device_probe_early().
> 
> While moving the call, check the return value of xe_wa_device_init(),
> which the old call site silently dropped.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stuart Summers <stuart.summers@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c |  3 ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c    | 14 ++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> index 273e2c45fea9..ae28584e1e95 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> @@ -712,9 +712,6 @@ int xe_device_probe_early(struct xe_device *xe)
>  {
>  	int err;
>  
> -	xe_wa_device_init(xe);
> -	xe_wa_process_device_oob(xe);
> -
>  	err = xe_mmio_probe_early(xe);
>  	if (err)
>  		return err;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c
> index ba23ec60477b..ee3766e2b938 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c
> @@ -15,6 +15,8 @@
>  #include <drm/drm_drv.h>
>  #include <drm/intel/pciids.h>
>  
> +#include <generated/xe_device_wa_oob.h>
> +
>  #include "display/xe_display.h"
>  #include "regs/xe_gt_regs.h"
>  #include "regs/xe_regs.h"
> @@ -39,6 +41,7 @@
>  #include "xe_survivability_mode.h"
>  #include "xe_tile.h"
>  #include "xe_tile_printk.h"
> +#include "xe_wa.h"
>  
>  enum toggle_d3cold {
>  	D3COLD_DISABLE,
> @@ -794,6 +797,17 @@ static int xe_info_init_early(struct xe_device *xe,
>  	xe->info.subplatform = subplatform_desc ?
>  		subplatform_desc->subplatform : XE_SUBPLATFORM_NONE;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Device OOB workarounds only match on platform, subplatform and
> +	 * platform step, which are all known by now, so process them here and
> +	 * make XE_DEVICE_WA() usable for the remainder of early probe.
> +	 */

I don't believe this comment is necessary here. Probably AI being over verbose?

Anyway,

Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>

> +	err = xe_wa_device_init(xe);
> +	if (err)
> +		return err;
> +
> +	xe_wa_process_device_oob(xe);
> +
>  	xe->info.dma_mask_size = desc->dma_mask_size;
>  	xe->info.va_bits = desc->va_bits;
>  	xe->info.vm_max_level = desc->vm_max_level;
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2026-11-11 19:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-04 21:53 [PATCH 0/3] Add a few sysctrl refactors in preparation for Stuart Summers
2026-11-04 21:53 ` [PATCH 1/3] drm/xe/sysctrl: Use preallocated mailbox staging buffers Stuart Summers
2026-11-11 19:56   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-11-04 21:53 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/xe: Process device OOB workarounds during early info init Stuart Summers
2026-11-11 19:57   ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2026-11-04 21:53 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/xe/sysctrl: Restore the SoC remapper on every runtime resume Stuart Summers
2026-11-11 19:55   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-11-04 21:55 ` [PATCH 0/3] Add a few sysctrl refactors in preparation for Summers, Stuart
2026-11-04 22:40 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for " Patchwork
2026-11-04 23:13 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-11-05  6:30 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for Add a few sysctrl refactors in preparation for (rev2) Patchwork
2026-11-05  7:09 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-11-06  0:38 ` ✓ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=avTIsmNyx96rMfWP@intel.com \
    --to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=anoop.c.vijay@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=riana.tauro@intel.com \
    --cc=stuart.summers@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox