From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Stuart Summers <stuart.summers@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>, <riana.tauro@intel.com>,
<anoop.c.vijay@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] drm/xe: Process device OOB workarounds during early info init
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2026 14:57:38 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <avTIsmNyx96rMfWP@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261104215353.234314-7-stuart.summers@intel.com>
On Wed, Nov 04, 2026 at 09:53:55PM +0000, Stuart Summers wrote:
> Device OOB workarounds only match on platform, subplatform and platform
> step, all of which are known once xe_info_init_early() has copied them
> out of the device descriptor. Processing them there instead of in
> xe_device_probe_early() makes XE_DEVICE_WA() usable for the rest of
> early probe, which runs before xe_device_probe_early().
>
> While moving the call, check the return value of xe_wa_device_init(),
> which the old call site silently dropped.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stuart Summers <stuart.summers@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c | 3 ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> index 273e2c45fea9..ae28584e1e95 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> @@ -712,9 +712,6 @@ int xe_device_probe_early(struct xe_device *xe)
> {
> int err;
>
> - xe_wa_device_init(xe);
> - xe_wa_process_device_oob(xe);
> -
> err = xe_mmio_probe_early(xe);
> if (err)
> return err;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c
> index ba23ec60477b..ee3766e2b938 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c
> @@ -15,6 +15,8 @@
> #include <drm/drm_drv.h>
> #include <drm/intel/pciids.h>
>
> +#include <generated/xe_device_wa_oob.h>
> +
> #include "display/xe_display.h"
> #include "regs/xe_gt_regs.h"
> #include "regs/xe_regs.h"
> @@ -39,6 +41,7 @@
> #include "xe_survivability_mode.h"
> #include "xe_tile.h"
> #include "xe_tile_printk.h"
> +#include "xe_wa.h"
>
> enum toggle_d3cold {
> D3COLD_DISABLE,
> @@ -794,6 +797,17 @@ static int xe_info_init_early(struct xe_device *xe,
> xe->info.subplatform = subplatform_desc ?
> subplatform_desc->subplatform : XE_SUBPLATFORM_NONE;
>
> + /*
> + * Device OOB workarounds only match on platform, subplatform and
> + * platform step, which are all known by now, so process them here and
> + * make XE_DEVICE_WA() usable for the remainder of early probe.
> + */
I don't believe this comment is necessary here. Probably AI being over verbose?
Anyway,
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> + err = xe_wa_device_init(xe);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> + xe_wa_process_device_oob(xe);
> +
> xe->info.dma_mask_size = desc->dma_mask_size;
> xe->info.va_bits = desc->va_bits;
> xe->info.vm_max_level = desc->vm_max_level;
> --
> 2.43.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-11 19:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-04 21:53 [PATCH 0/3] Add a few sysctrl refactors in preparation for Stuart Summers
2026-11-04 21:53 ` [PATCH 1/3] drm/xe/sysctrl: Use preallocated mailbox staging buffers Stuart Summers
2026-11-11 19:56 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-11-04 21:53 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/xe: Process device OOB workarounds during early info init Stuart Summers
2026-11-11 19:57 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2026-11-04 21:53 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/xe/sysctrl: Restore the SoC remapper on every runtime resume Stuart Summers
2026-11-11 19:55 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-11-04 21:55 ` [PATCH 0/3] Add a few sysctrl refactors in preparation for Summers, Stuart
2026-11-04 22:40 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for " Patchwork
2026-11-04 23:13 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-11-05 6:30 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for Add a few sysctrl refactors in preparation for (rev2) Patchwork
2026-11-05 7:09 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-11-06 0:38 ` ✓ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=avTIsmNyx96rMfWP@intel.com \
--to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=anoop.c.vijay@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=riana.tauro@intel.com \
--cc=stuart.summers@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox