From: "Summers, Stuart" <stuart.summers@intel.com>
To: "intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Brost, Matthew" <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: "stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
"Alvi, Arselan" <arselan.alvi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/xe: Tie page count tracepoints to TTM accounting functions
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2026 20:01:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b019bd43e7f71676e6ac2970253a073af45d8438.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260107002154.1934332-1-matthew.brost@intel.com>
On Tue, 2026-01-06 at 16:21 -0800, Matthew Brost wrote:
> Page accounting can change via the shrinker without calling
> xe_ttm_tt_unpopulate(), but those paths already update accounting
> through the xe_ttm_tt_account_*() helpers.
I see this is getting also called through the xe_bo_pin/unpin functions
with a check for ttm_tt_is_populated(). Does that mean after this
change we'd get a double accounting in those cases?
Thanks,
Stuart
>
> Move the page count tracepoints into xe_ttm_tt_account_add() and
> xe_ttm_tt_account_subtract() so accounting updates are recorded
> consistently, regardless of whether pages are populated, unpopulated,
> or reclaimed via the shrinker.
>
> This avoids missing page count updates and keeps global accounting
> balanced across all TT lifecycle paths.
>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Fixes: ce3d39fae3d3 ("drm/xe/bo: add GPU memory trace points")
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c | 7 +++++--
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c
> index 8b6474cd3eaf..33afaee38f48 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c
> @@ -432,6 +432,9 @@ struct sg_table *xe_bo_sg(struct xe_bo *bo)
> return xe_tt->sg;
> }
>
> +static void update_global_total_pages(struct ttm_device *ttm_dev,
> + long num_pages);
> +
> /*
> * Account ttm pages against the device shrinker's shrinkable and
> * purgeable counts.
> @@ -440,6 +443,7 @@ static void xe_ttm_tt_account_add(struct
> xe_device *xe, struct ttm_tt *tt)
> {
> struct xe_ttm_tt *xe_tt = container_of(tt, struct xe_ttm_tt,
> ttm);
>
> + update_global_total_pages(&xe->ttm, tt->num_pages);
> if (xe_tt->purgeable)
> xe_shrinker_mod_pages(xe->mem.shrinker, 0, tt-
> >num_pages);
> else
> @@ -450,6 +454,7 @@ static void xe_ttm_tt_account_subtract(struct
> xe_device *xe, struct ttm_tt *tt)
> {
> struct xe_ttm_tt *xe_tt = container_of(tt, struct xe_ttm_tt,
> ttm);
>
> + update_global_total_pages(&xe->ttm, -(long)tt->num_pages);
> if (xe_tt->purgeable)
> xe_shrinker_mod_pages(xe->mem.shrinker, 0, -(long)tt-
> >num_pages);
> else
> @@ -575,7 +580,6 @@ static int xe_ttm_tt_populate(struct ttm_device
> *ttm_dev, struct ttm_tt *tt,
>
> xe_tt->purgeable = false;
> xe_ttm_tt_account_add(ttm_to_xe_device(ttm_dev), tt);
> - update_global_total_pages(ttm_dev, tt->num_pages);
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -592,7 +596,6 @@ static void xe_ttm_tt_unpopulate(struct
> ttm_device *ttm_dev, struct ttm_tt *tt)
>
> ttm_pool_free(&ttm_dev->pool, tt);
> xe_ttm_tt_account_subtract(xe, tt);
> - update_global_total_pages(ttm_dev, -(long)tt->num_pages);
> }
>
> static void xe_ttm_tt_destroy(struct ttm_device *ttm_dev, struct
> ttm_tt *tt)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-07 20:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-07 0:21 [PATCH] drm/xe: Tie page count tracepoints to TTM accounting functions Matthew Brost
2026-01-07 0:32 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for " Patchwork
2026-01-07 1:08 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-01-07 3:16 ` [PATCH] " Alvi, Arselan
2026-01-07 3:32 ` Alvi, Arselan
2026-01-07 4:02 ` ✓ Xe.CI.Full: success for " Patchwork
2026-01-07 20:01 ` Summers, Stuart [this message]
2026-01-07 20:35 ` [PATCH] " Matthew Brost
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b019bd43e7f71676e6ac2970253a073af45d8438.camel@intel.com \
--to=stuart.summers@intel.com \
--cc=arselan.alvi@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox