From: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
To: Jia Yao <jia.yao@intel.com>, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/3] drm/xe/guc_ads: allocate UM queues in a separate BO
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2026 11:30:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b0765ccb-0460-4561-9fde-b9ad2de299f3@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260731232232.548015-2-jia.yao@intel.com>
On 01/08/2026 00:22, Jia Yao wrote:
> Move the UM queues into a dedicated UC BO (ads->um_queue_bo) and avoid
> CPU memset operations on it, which eliminates the CPU as a potential
> cacheline-polluting agent and helps maintain consistency between GAM
> writes and GuC reads.
>
> Fixes: 9c57bc08652a ("drm/xe/lnl: Drop force_probe requirement")
> Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.12+
> Signed-off-by: Jia Yao <jia.yao@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c | 6 ++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ads.c | 91 +++++++++++++++++----------
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ads_types.h | 5 ++
> 3 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c
> index 4286bd05c686..4f132bf8539d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c
> @@ -732,6 +732,12 @@ static int xe_guc_realloc_post_hwconfig(struct xe_guc *guc)
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> + if (guc->ads.um_queue_bo) {
> + ret = xe_managed_bo_reinit_in_vram(xe, tile, &guc->ads.um_queue_bo);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ads.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ads.c
> index f0ac00586d3a..46c4d702d1f3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ads.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ads.c
> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
> #include <linux/fault-inject.h>
>
> #include <drm/drm_managed.h>
> +#include <drm/drm_prime.h>
>
> #include <generated/xe_wa_oob.h>
>
> @@ -64,10 +65,14 @@ ads_to_map(struct xe_guc_ads *ads)
>
> /*
> * The Additional Data Struct (ADS) has pointers for different buffers used by
> - * the GuC. One single gem object contains the ADS struct itself (guc_ads) and
> - * all the extra buffers indirectly linked via the ADS struct's entries.
> + * the GuC. One gem object (ads->bo) contains the ADS struct itself (guc_ads)
> + * and most of the extra buffers linked via the ADS struct's entries. The UM
> + * fault queues (PAGE_FAULT, PAGE_FAULT_RESPONSE, ACCESS_COUNTER rings) are
> + * kept in a separate BO (ads->um_queue_bo) so that the full memset of ads->bo
> + * performed on every GT reset does not discard fault descriptors already
> + * written into the rings by the GPU.
> *
> - * Layout of the ADS blob allocated for the GuC:
> + * Layout of the ADS blob (ads->bo):
> *
> * +---------------------------------------+ <== base
> * | guc_ads |
> @@ -99,10 +104,6 @@ ads_to_map(struct xe_guc_ads *ads)
> * +---------------------------------------+
> * | padding |
> * +---------------------------------------+ <== 4K aligned
> - * | UM queues |
> - * +---------------------------------------+
> - * | padding |
> - * +---------------------------------------+ <== 4K aligned
> * | private data |
> * +---------------------------------------+
> * | padding |
> @@ -156,16 +157,6 @@ static size_t guc_ads_capture_size(struct xe_guc_ads *ads)
> return PAGE_ALIGN(ads->capture_size);
> }
>
> -static size_t guc_ads_um_queues_size(struct xe_guc_ads *ads)
> -{
> - struct xe_device *xe = ads_to_xe(ads);
> -
> - if (!xe->info.has_usm)
> - return 0;
> -
> - return GUC_UM_QUEUE_SIZE * GUC_UM_HW_QUEUE_MAX;
> -}
> -
> static size_t guc_ads_private_data_size(struct xe_guc_ads *ads)
> {
> return PAGE_ALIGN(ads_to_guc(ads)->fw.private_data_size);
> @@ -206,22 +197,12 @@ static size_t guc_ads_capture_offset(struct xe_guc_ads *ads)
> return PAGE_ALIGN(offset);
> }
>
> -static size_t guc_ads_um_queues_offset(struct xe_guc_ads *ads)
> -{
> - u32 offset;
> -
> - offset = guc_ads_capture_offset(ads) +
> - guc_ads_capture_size(ads);
> -
> - return PAGE_ALIGN(offset);
> -}
> -
> static size_t guc_ads_private_data_offset(struct xe_guc_ads *ads)
> {
> size_t offset;
>
> - offset = guc_ads_um_queues_offset(ads) +
> - guc_ads_um_queues_size(ads);
> + offset = guc_ads_capture_offset(ads) +
> + guc_ads_capture_size(ads);
>
> return PAGE_ALIGN(offset);
> }
> @@ -461,6 +442,46 @@ int xe_guc_ads_init(struct xe_guc_ads *ads)
>
> ads->bo = bo;
>
> + if (xe->info.has_usm) {
> + /*
> + * Allocate a separate BO for the HW fault ring (UM queues).
> + *
> + * Round the size up to the next power of two so that on iGPU
> + * (system memory, no IOMMU) the TTM pool issues a single
> + * alloc_pages(order=N) call, maximising the chance of getting
> + * a physically contiguous block. GuC requires contiguous DPA.
> + */
> + size_t um_size = IS_DGFX(xe) ?
> + GUC_UM_QUEUE_SIZE * GUC_UM_HW_QUEUE_MAX :
> + roundup_pow_of_two(GUC_UM_QUEUE_SIZE *
> + GUC_UM_HW_QUEUE_MAX);
I think the suggestion was to put this into patch 2, otherwise at this
point it is still in system memory so would still need the roundup even
on dgpu.
> +
> + bo = xe_managed_bo_create_pin_map(xe, tile, um_size,
> + XE_BO_FLAG_SYSTEM |
> + XE_BO_FLAG_GGTT |
> + XE_BO_FLAG_GGTT_INVALIDATE |
> + XE_BO_FLAG_PINNED_NORESTORE);
> + if (IS_ERR(bo))
> + return PTR_ERR(bo);
> +
> + /*
> + * On pre-Xe3p platforms, GAM (not GuC) accesses the UM queue
> + * ring via base_dpa, which must be a contiguous DMA address
> + * range. Verify that the allocated pages are contiguous in
> + * DMA address space.
> + */
> + if (xe_bo_sg(bo) &&
> + !xe_guc_using_main_gamctrl_queues(ads_to_guc(ads)) &&
> + unlikely(drm_prime_get_contiguous_size(xe_bo_sg(bo)) <
> + GUC_UM_QUEUE_SIZE * GUC_UM_HW_QUEUE_MAX)) {
> + drm_err(&xe->drm,
> + "UM fault queue memory is not contiguous in DMA address space; GAM requires contiguous DPA\n");
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> +
> + ads->um_queue_bo = bo;
> + }
> +
> return 0;
> }
> ALLOW_ERROR_INJECTION(xe_guc_ads_init, ERRNO); /* See xe_pci_probe() */
> @@ -893,7 +914,7 @@ static void guc_mmio_reg_state_init(struct xe_guc_ads *ads)
>
> static void guc_um_init_params(struct xe_guc_ads *ads)
> {
> - u32 um_queue_offset = guc_ads_um_queues_offset(ads);
> + struct xe_bo *um_bo = ads->um_queue_bo;
> struct xe_guc *guc = ads_to_guc(ads);
> struct xe_device *xe = ads_to_xe(ads);
> u64 base_dpa;
> @@ -903,8 +924,14 @@ static void guc_um_init_params(struct xe_guc_ads *ads)
>
> with_dpa = !xe_guc_using_main_gamctrl_queues(guc);
>
> - base_ggtt = xe_bo_ggtt_addr(ads->bo) + um_queue_offset;
> - base_dpa = xe_bo_main_addr(ads->bo, PAGE_SIZE) + um_queue_offset;
> + if (um_bo) {
> + /* All USM platforms: UM queues in dedicated um_queue_bo */
> + base_ggtt = xe_bo_ggtt_addr(um_bo);
> + base_dpa = xe_bo_main_addr(um_bo, PAGE_SIZE);
> + } else {
> + /* Platform does not support USM: no UM queues, nothing to do */
> + return;
> + }
>
> for (i = 0; i < GUC_UM_HW_QUEUE_MAX; ++i) {
> /*
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ads_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ads_types.h
> index 48a8e092023f..845c1fbd93a4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ads_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ads_types.h
> @@ -16,6 +16,11 @@ struct xe_bo;
> struct xe_guc_ads {
> /** @bo: Xe BO for GuC ads blob */
> struct xe_bo *bo;
> + /**
> + * @um_queue_bo: Dedicated BO for the HW fault ring (UM queues).
> + * NULL if the platform does not support USM.
> + */
> + struct xe_bo *um_queue_bo;
> /** @golden_lrc_size: golden LRC size */
> size_t golden_lrc_size;
> /** @regset_size: size of register set passed to GuC for save/restore */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-03 10:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-31 23:22 [PATCH v6 0/1] drm/xe/guc_ads: allocate UM queues in a separate UC BO Jia Yao
2026-07-31 23:22 ` [PATCH v6 1/3] drm/xe/guc_ads: allocate UM queues in a separate BO Jia Yao
2026-08-03 10:30 ` Matthew Auld [this message]
2026-07-31 23:22 ` [PATCH v6 2/3] drm/xe/guc_ads: allocate UM queues in VRAM on dGFX Jia Yao
2026-07-31 23:22 ` [PATCH v6 3/3] drm/xe/guc_ads: use uncached mapping for UM queue BO Jia Yao
2026-08-01 0:09 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe/guc_ads: allocate UM queues in a separate UC BO (rev4) Patchwork
2026-08-01 1:13 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-08-01 1:44 ` ✓ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b0765ccb-0460-4561-9fde-b9ad2de299f3@intel.com \
--to=matthew.auld@intel.com \
--cc=gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jia.yao@intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox