From: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
To: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>,
<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm/xe: Introduce IF_ARGS macro utility
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2025 11:47:03 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b46aa249-d5d1-410f-ab15-59fababf964f@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251212173449.192639-2-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
On 12/12/2025 9:34 AM, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
> We want to extend our macro-based KLV list definitions with new
> information about the version from which given KLV is supported.
> Add utility IF_ARGS macro that can be used in code generators to
> emit different code based on the presence of additional arguments.
>
> Introduce macro itself and extend our kunit tests to cover it.
> We will use this macro in next patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_args_test.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_args.h | 18 +++++++++
> 2 files changed, 71 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_args_test.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_args_test.c
> index f3fb23aa5d2e..d11ea610f67a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_args_test.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_args_test.c
> @@ -78,6 +78,24 @@ static void pick_arg_example(struct kunit *test)
> #undef buz
> }
>
> +static void if_args_example(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + enum { Z = 1, Q };
> +
> +#define foo X, Y
> +#define bar IF_ARGS(Z, Q, foo)
> +#define buz IF_ARGS(Z, Q, DROP_FIRST_ARG(FIRST_ARG(foo)))
> +
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, bar, Z);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, buz, Q);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, __stringify(bar), "Z");
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, __stringify(buz), "Q");
> +
> +#undef foo
> +#undef bar
> +#undef buz
> +}
> +
> static void sep_comma_example(struct kunit *test)
> {
> #define foo(f) f(X) f(Y) f(Z) f(Q)
> @@ -198,6 +216,39 @@ static void last_arg_test(struct kunit *test)
> KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, __stringify(LAST_ARG(MAX_ARGS)), "-12");
> }
>
> +static void if_args_test(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + bool with_args = true;
> + bool no_args = false;
> + enum { X = 100 };
> +
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, IF_ARGS(true, false, FOO_ARGS));
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, IF_ARGS(true, false, NO_ARGS));
> +
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, CONCATENATE(IF_ARGS(with, no, FOO_ARGS), _args));
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, CONCATENATE(IF_ARGS(with, no, NO_ARGS), _args));
> +
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, __stringify(IF_ARGS(yes, no, FOO_ARGS)), "yes");
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, __stringify(IF_ARGS(no, no, NO_ARGS)), "no");
> +
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, IF_ARGS(CALL_ARGS(COUNT_ARGS, FOO_ARGS), -1, FOO_ARGS), 4);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, IF_ARGS(CALL_ARGS(COUNT_ARGS, FOO_ARGS), -1, NO_ARGS), -1);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, IF_ARGS(CALL_ARGS(COUNT_ARGS, NO_ARGS), -1, FOO_ARGS), 0);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, IF_ARGS(CALL_ARGS(COUNT_ARGS, NO_ARGS), -1, NO_ARGS), -1);
> +
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test,
> + FIRST_ARG(CONCATENATE(CALL_ARGS(IF_ARGS, FOO, MAX, FOO_ARGS), _ARGS)), X);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test,
> + FIRST_ARG(CONCATENATE(CALL_ARGS(IF_ARGS, FOO, MAX, NO_ARGS), _ARGS)), -1);
> +
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test,
> + CALL_ARGS(COUNT_ARGS,
> + CONCATENATE(CALL_ARGS(IF_ARGS, FOO, MAX, FOO_ARGS), _ARGS)), 4);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test,
> + CALL_ARGS(COUNT_ARGS,
> + CONCATENATE(CALL_ARGS(IF_ARGS, FOO, MAX, NO_ARGS), _ARGS)), 12);
> +}
> +
> static struct kunit_case args_tests[] = {
> KUNIT_CASE(count_args_test),
> KUNIT_CASE(call_args_example),
> @@ -209,6 +260,8 @@ static struct kunit_case args_tests[] = {
> KUNIT_CASE(last_arg_example),
> KUNIT_CASE(last_arg_test),
> KUNIT_CASE(pick_arg_example),
> + KUNIT_CASE(if_args_example),
> + KUNIT_CASE(if_args_test),
> KUNIT_CASE(sep_comma_example),
> {}
> };
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_args.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_args.h
> index 4dbc7e53c624..b24e6d3349bb 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_args.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_args.h
> @@ -121,6 +121,24 @@
> #define PICK_ARG11(args...) PICK_ARG10(DROP_FIRST_ARG(args))
> #define PICK_ARG12(args...) PICK_ARG11(DROP_FIRST_ARG(args))
>
> +/**
> + * IF_ARGS() - Make selection based on optional argument list.
> + * @then: token to return if arguments are present
> + * @else: token to return if arguments are empty
> + * @...: arguments to check (optional)
> + *
> + * This macro allows to select a token based on the presence of the argumen list.
> + *
> + * Example:
> + *
> + * #define foo X, Y
> + * #define bar IF_ARGS(Z, Q, foo)
> + * #define buz IF_ARGS(Z, Q, DROP_FIRST_ARG(FIRST_ARG(foo)))
> + *
> + * With above definitions bar expands to Z while buz expands to Q.
> + */
> +#define IF_ARGS(then, else, ...) FIRST_ARG(__VA_OPT__(then,) else)
A bit confused about the __VA_OPT__ support since it is officially a C23
extension and the kernel build uses gnu11, but it looks like it is
supported as part of GNU C since GCC 8 (the minimum GCC version for
kernel builds is currently 8.1), so we're probably ok.
It is already used in a couple of places in the kernel (with only one of
them having a GCC version check AFAICS), so I won't block on this, but
please get a second pair of eyes to confirm this is ok.
Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Daniele
> +
> /**
> * ARGS_SEP_COMMA - Definition of a comma character.
> *
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-12 19:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-12 17:34 [PATCH 0/3] PF: Add handling for new adverse event thresholds Michal Wajdeczko
2025-12-12 17:34 ` [PATCH 1/3] drm/xe: Introduce IF_ARGS macro utility Michal Wajdeczko
2025-12-12 19:47 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio [this message]
2025-12-12 17:34 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/xe/pf: Prepare for new threshold KLVs Michal Wajdeczko
2025-12-12 20:12 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2025-12-12 17:34 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/xe/pf: Add handling for MLRC adverse event threshold Michal Wajdeczko
2025-12-12 20:15 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2025-12-12 20:17 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2025-12-15 13:46 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-12-12 18:02 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for PF: Add handling for new adverse event thresholds Patchwork
2025-12-12 18:03 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-12-12 19:14 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-12-13 10:55 ` ✓ Xe.CI.Full: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b46aa249-d5d1-410f-ab15-59fababf964f@intel.com \
--to=daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox