Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
To: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>,
	<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Riana Tauro <riana.tauro@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/2] drm/xe: Decouple GuC RC code from xe_guc_pc
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2026 17:46:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b677bcb0-7db6-4d87-9318-294e004b0167@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260128022320.1054591-2-vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>



On 1/28/2026 3:23 AM, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote:
> Move enable/disable GuC RC logic into the new file. This will
> allow us to independently enable/disable GuC RC and not rely
> on SLPC related functions. GuC already provides separate H2G
> interfaces to setup GuC RC and SLPC.
> 
> Cc: Riana Tauro <riana.tauro@intel.com>
> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
> ---
> v2: Comments (Michal W), remove duplicate c6_enable calls from
> xe_guc_pc.
> 
> v3: Clarify crosss interactions between xe_guc_rc and xe_guc_pc
> (Michal W)
> 
> v4: More comments (Michal W)
> 
> v5: Remove rc_init and use enable/disable (Riana)
> 
> v6: Link to kernel docs (Riana)
> 
> v7: Don't call devm_add_action_or_reset() in rc_enable (Michal W)
> ---
>  Documentation/gpu/xe/xe_firmware.rst |   3 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile          |   1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c           |   1 -
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c          |   6 ++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c       |  70 +++------------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.h       |   1 -
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_rc.c       | 129 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_rc.h       |  15 ++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_uc.c           |  10 +--
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_uc.h           |   1 -
>  10 files changed, 172 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_rc.c
>  create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_rc.h
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/gpu/xe/xe_firmware.rst b/Documentation/gpu/xe/xe_firmware.rst
> index 5d23e9f27391..9c15a300bc62 100644
> --- a/Documentation/gpu/xe/xe_firmware.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/gpu/xe/xe_firmware.rst
> @@ -31,6 +31,9 @@ GuC Power Conservation (PC)
>  .. kernel-doc:: drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c
>     :doc: GuC Power Conservation (PC)
>  
> +.. kernel-doc:: drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_rc.c
> +   :doc: GuC Render C-states (GuC RC)
> +
>  PCIe Gen5 Limitations
>  =====================
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile
> index 51a9a531fb7e..41ec698b3cc1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile
> @@ -74,6 +74,7 @@ xe-y += xe_bb.o \
>  	xe_guc_log.o \
>  	xe_guc_pagefault.o \
>  	xe_guc_pc.o \
> +	xe_guc_rc.o \
>  	xe_guc_submit.o \
>  	xe_guc_tlb_inval.o \
>  	xe_heci_gsc.o \
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c
> index 9d090d0f2438..c8a1d44bbf3a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c
> @@ -852,7 +852,6 @@ static void gt_reset_worker(struct work_struct *w)
>  	if (IS_SRIOV_PF(gt_to_xe(gt)))
>  		xe_gt_sriov_pf_stop_prepare(gt);
>  
> -	xe_uc_gucrc_disable(&gt->uc);
>  	xe_uc_stop_prepare(&gt->uc);
>  	xe_pagefault_reset(gt_to_xe(gt), gt);
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c
> index 2efc4678fa73..dc198d499da3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c
> @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
>  #include "xe_guc_klv_helpers.h"
>  #include "xe_guc_log.h"
>  #include "xe_guc_pc.h"
> +#include "xe_guc_rc.h"
>  #include "xe_guc_relay.h"
>  #include "xe_guc_submit.h"
>  #include "xe_memirq.h"
> @@ -880,6 +881,10 @@ int xe_guc_init_post_hwconfig(struct xe_guc *guc)
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
>  
> +	ret = xe_guc_rc_init(guc);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
>  	ret = xe_guc_engine_activity_init(guc);
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
> @@ -1620,6 +1625,7 @@ void xe_guc_stop_prepare(struct xe_guc *guc)
>  	if (!IS_SRIOV_VF(guc_to_xe(guc))) {
>  		int err;
>  
> +		xe_guc_rc_disable(guc);
>  		err = xe_guc_pc_stop(&guc->pc);
>  		xe_gt_WARN(guc_to_gt(guc), err, "Failed to stop GuC PC: %pe\n",
>  			   ERR_PTR(err));
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c
> index 5e5495a39a3c..878eb273c3e6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c
> @@ -92,6 +92,17 @@
>   * Render-C states is also a GuC PC feature that is now enabled in Xe for
>   * all platforms.
>   *
> + * Implementation details:
> + * -----------------------
> + * The implementation for GuC Power Management features is split as follows:
> + *
> + * xe_guc_rc:  Logic for handling GuC RC
> + * xe_gt_idle: Host side logic for RC6 and Coarse Power gating (CPG)
> + * xe_guc_pc:  Logic for all other SLPC related features
> + *
> + * There is some cross interaction between these where host C6 will need to be
> + * enabled when we plan to skip GuC RC. Also, the GuC RC mode is currently
> + * overridden through 0x3003 which is an SLPC H2G call.
>   */
>  
>  static struct xe_guc *pc_to_guc(struct xe_guc_pc *pc)
> @@ -253,22 +264,6 @@ static int pc_action_unset_param(struct xe_guc_pc *pc, u8 id)
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> -static int pc_action_setup_gucrc(struct xe_guc_pc *pc, u32 mode)
> -{
> -	struct xe_guc_ct *ct = pc_to_ct(pc);
> -	u32 action[] = {
> -		GUC_ACTION_HOST2GUC_SETUP_PC_GUCRC,
> -		mode,
> -	};
> -	int ret;
> -
> -	ret = xe_guc_ct_send(ct, action, ARRAY_SIZE(action), 0, 0);
> -	if (ret && !(xe_device_wedged(pc_to_xe(pc)) && ret == -ECANCELED))
> -		xe_gt_err(pc_to_gt(pc), "GuC RC enable mode=%u failed: %pe\n",
> -			  mode, ERR_PTR(ret));
> -	return ret;
> -}
> -
>  static u32 decode_freq(u32 raw)
>  {
>  	return DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(raw * GT_FREQUENCY_MULTIPLIER,
> @@ -1050,30 +1045,6 @@ int xe_guc_pc_restore_stashed_freq(struct xe_guc_pc *pc)
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> -/**
> - * xe_guc_pc_gucrc_disable - Disable GuC RC
> - * @pc: Xe_GuC_PC instance
> - *
> - * Disables GuC RC by taking control of RC6 back from GuC.
> - *
> - * Return: 0 on success, negative error code on error.
> - */
> -int xe_guc_pc_gucrc_disable(struct xe_guc_pc *pc)
> -{
> -	struct xe_device *xe = pc_to_xe(pc);
> -	struct xe_gt *gt = pc_to_gt(pc);
> -	int ret = 0;
> -
> -	if (xe->info.skip_guc_pc)
> -		return 0;
> -
> -	ret = pc_action_setup_gucrc(pc, GUCRC_HOST_CONTROL);
> -	if (ret)
> -		return ret;
> -
> -	return xe_gt_idle_disable_c6(gt);
> -}
> -
>  /**
>   * xe_guc_pc_override_gucrc_mode - override GUCRC mode
>   * @pc: Xe_GuC_PC instance
> @@ -1247,9 +1218,6 @@ int xe_guc_pc_start(struct xe_guc_pc *pc)
>  		return -ETIMEDOUT;
>  
>  	if (xe->info.skip_guc_pc) {
> -		if (xe->info.platform != XE_PVC)
> -			xe_gt_idle_enable_c6(gt);
> -
>  		/* Request max possible since dynamic freq mgmt is not enabled */
>  		pc_set_cur_freq(pc, UINT_MAX);
>  		return 0;
> @@ -1291,15 +1259,6 @@ int xe_guc_pc_start(struct xe_guc_pc *pc)
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
>  
> -	if (xe->info.platform == XE_PVC) {
> -		xe_guc_pc_gucrc_disable(pc);
> -		return 0;
> -	}
> -
> -	ret = pc_action_setup_gucrc(pc, GUCRC_FIRMWARE_CONTROL);
> -	if (ret)
> -		return ret;
> -
>  	/* Enable SLPC Optimized Strategy for compute */
>  	ret = pc_action_set_strategy(pc, SLPC_OPTIMIZED_STRATEGY_COMPUTE);
>  
> @@ -1319,10 +1278,8 @@ int xe_guc_pc_stop(struct xe_guc_pc *pc)
>  {
>  	struct xe_device *xe = pc_to_xe(pc);
>  
> -	if (xe->info.skip_guc_pc) {
> -		xe_gt_idle_disable_c6(pc_to_gt(pc));
> +	if (xe->info.skip_guc_pc)
>  		return 0;
> -	}
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&pc->freq_lock);
>  	pc->freq_ready = false;
> @@ -1343,8 +1300,7 @@ static void xe_guc_pc_fini_hw(void *arg)
>  	if (xe_device_wedged(xe))
>  		return;
>  
> -	CLASS(xe_force_wake, fw_ref)(gt_to_fw(pc_to_gt(pc)), XE_FORCEWAKE_ALL);
> -	xe_guc_pc_gucrc_disable(pc);
> +	CLASS(xe_force_wake, fw_ref)(gt_to_fw(pc_to_gt(pc)), XE_FW_GT);

this FW_ALL => FW_GT change probably should be done in a separate patch

>  	XE_WARN_ON(xe_guc_pc_stop(pc));
>  
>  	/* Bind requested freq to mert_freq_cap before unload */
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.h
> index 0e31396f103c..1b95873b262e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.h
> @@ -15,7 +15,6 @@ struct drm_printer;
>  int xe_guc_pc_init(struct xe_guc_pc *pc);
>  int xe_guc_pc_start(struct xe_guc_pc *pc);
>  int xe_guc_pc_stop(struct xe_guc_pc *pc);
> -int xe_guc_pc_gucrc_disable(struct xe_guc_pc *pc);
>  int xe_guc_pc_override_gucrc_mode(struct xe_guc_pc *pc, enum slpc_gucrc_mode mode);
>  int xe_guc_pc_unset_gucrc_mode(struct xe_guc_pc *pc);
>  void xe_guc_pc_print(struct xe_guc_pc *pc, struct drm_printer *p);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_rc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_rc.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..55eeee7b1011
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_rc.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,129 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
> +/*
> + * Copyright © 2026 Intel Corporation
> + */
> +
> +#include <drm/drm_print.h>
> +
> +#include "abi/guc_actions_slpc_abi.h"
> +#include "xe_device.h"
> +#include "xe_force_wake.h"
> +#include "xe_gt.h"
> +#include "xe_gt_idle.h"
> +#include "xe_gt_printk.h"
> +#include "xe_guc.h"
> +#include "xe_guc_ct.h"
> +#include "xe_guc_rc.h"
> +#include "xe_pm.h"
> +
> +/**
> + * DOC: GuC RC (Render C-states)
> + *
> + * GuC handles the GT transition to deeper C-states in conjunction with Pcode.
> + * GuC RC can be enabled independently of the frequency component in SLPC,
> + * which is also controlled by GuC.
> + *
> + * This file will contain all H2G related logic for handling Render C-states.
> + * There are some calls to xe_gt_idle, where we enable host C6 when GuC RC is
> + * skipped. GuC RC is mostly independent of xe_guc_pc with the exception of
> + * functions that override the mode for which we have to rely on the SLPC H2G
> + * calls.
> + */
> +
> +static int guc_action_setup_gucrc(struct xe_guc *guc, u32 control)
> +{
> +	u32 action[] = {
> +		GUC_ACTION_HOST2GUC_SETUP_PC_GUCRC,
> +		control,
> +	};
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = xe_guc_ct_send(&guc->ct, action, ARRAY_SIZE(action), 0, 0);
> +	if (ret && !(xe_device_wedged(guc_to_xe(guc)) && ret == -ECANCELED))

nit: I still think we should have this 'H2G canceled due to wedge' logic inside a CTB layer as this is applicable scenario for other H2G actions as well, but this could be improved later

> +		xe_gt_err(guc_to_gt(guc),
> +			  "GuC RC setup %s(%u) failed (%pe)\n",
> +			   control == GUCRC_HOST_CONTROL ? "HOST_CONTROL" :
> +			   control == GUCRC_FIRMWARE_CONTROL ? "FIRMWARE_CONTROL" :
> +			   "UNKNOWN", control, ERR_PTR(ret));
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * xe_guc_rc_disable() - Disable GuC RC
> + * @guc: Xe GuC instance
> + *
> + * Disables GuC RC by taking control of RC6 back from GuC.
> + */
> +void xe_guc_rc_disable(struct xe_guc *guc)
> +{
> +	struct xe_device *xe = guc_to_xe(guc);
> +
> +	if (!xe->info.skip_guc_pc && xe->info.platform != XE_PVC)
> +		if (guc_action_setup_gucrc(guc, GUCRC_HOST_CONTROL))
> +			return;
> +
> +	xe_gt_WARN_ON(guc_to_gt(guc), xe_gt_idle_disable_c6(guc_to_gt(guc)));

nit: maybe it's worth to have local var:

	struct xe_gt *gt = guc_to_gt(guc);

> +}
> +
> +static void xe_guc_rc_fini_hw(void *arg)
> +{
> +	struct xe_guc *guc = arg;
> +	struct xe_device *xe = guc_to_xe(guc);
> +	struct xe_gt *gt = guc_to_gt(guc);
> +
> +	if (xe_device_wedged(xe))
> +		return;
> +
> +	CLASS(xe_force_wake, fw_ref)(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GT);
> +	xe_guc_rc_disable(guc);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * xe_guc_rc_init() - Init GuC RC
> + * @guc: Xe GuC instance
> + *
> + * Add callback action for GuC RC
> + *
> + * Return: 0 on success, negative error code on error.
> + */
> +int xe_guc_rc_init(struct xe_guc *guc)
> +{
> +	struct xe_device *xe = guc_to_xe(guc);
> +	struct xe_gt *gt = guc_to_gt(guc);
> +
> +	xe_gt_assert(gt, xe_device_uc_enabled(xe));
> +
> +	return devm_add_action_or_reset(xe->drm.dev, xe_guc_rc_fini_hw, guc);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * xe_guc_rc_enable() - Enable GuC RC feature if applicable
> + * @guc: Xe GuC instance
> + *
> + * Enables GuC RC feature.
> + *
> + * Return: 0 on success, negative error code on error.
> + */
> +int xe_guc_rc_enable(struct xe_guc *guc)
> +{
> +	struct xe_device *xe = guc_to_xe(guc);
> +	struct xe_gt *gt = guc_to_gt(guc);
> +
> +	xe_gt_assert(gt, xe_device_uc_enabled(xe));
> +
> +	CLASS(xe_force_wake, fw_ref)(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GT);
> +	if (!xe_force_wake_ref_has_domain(fw_ref.domains, XE_FW_GT))
> +		return -ETIMEDOUT;
> +
> +	if (xe->info.platform == XE_PVC) {
> +		xe_guc_rc_disable(guc);
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (xe->info.skip_guc_pc) {
> +		xe_gt_idle_enable_c6(gt);
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +
> +	return guc_action_setup_gucrc(guc, GUCRC_FIRMWARE_CONTROL);
> +}
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_rc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_rc.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..35fabb82cb0e
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_rc.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT */
> +/*
> + * Copyright © 2026 Intel Corporation
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef _XE_GUC_RC_H_
> +#define _XE_GUC_RC_H_
> +
> +struct xe_guc;
> +
> +int xe_guc_rc_init(struct xe_guc *guc);
> +void xe_guc_rc_disable(struct xe_guc *guc);
> +int xe_guc_rc_enable(struct xe_guc *guc);

nit: maybe they should be listed in the use-order?

	init
	enable
	disable

> +
> +#endif
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_uc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_uc.c
> index 3f63c2a7e86d..d9aa845a308d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_uc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_uc.c
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
>  #include "xe_gt_sriov_vf.h"
>  #include "xe_guc.h"
>  #include "xe_guc_pc.h"
> +#include "xe_guc_rc.h"
>  #include "xe_guc_engine_activity.h"
>  #include "xe_huc.h"
>  #include "xe_sriov.h"
> @@ -214,6 +215,10 @@ int xe_uc_load_hw(struct xe_uc *uc)
>  	if (ret)
>  		goto err_out;
>  
> +	ret = xe_guc_rc_enable(&uc->guc);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto err_out;
> +
>  	xe_guc_engine_activity_enable_stats(&uc->guc);
>  
>  	/* We don't fail the driver load if HuC fails to auth */
> @@ -242,11 +247,6 @@ int xe_uc_reset_prepare(struct xe_uc *uc)
>  	return xe_guc_reset_prepare(&uc->guc);
>  }
>  
> -void xe_uc_gucrc_disable(struct xe_uc *uc)
> -{
> -	XE_WARN_ON(xe_guc_pc_gucrc_disable(&uc->guc.pc));
> -}
> -
>  void xe_uc_stop_prepare(struct xe_uc *uc)
>  {
>  	xe_gsc_stop_prepare(&uc->gsc);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_uc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_uc.h
> index 5398da1a8097..255a54a8f876 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_uc.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_uc.h
> @@ -12,7 +12,6 @@ int xe_uc_init_noalloc(struct xe_uc *uc);
>  int xe_uc_init(struct xe_uc *uc);
>  int xe_uc_init_post_hwconfig(struct xe_uc *uc);
>  int xe_uc_load_hw(struct xe_uc *uc);
> -void xe_uc_gucrc_disable(struct xe_uc *uc);
>  int xe_uc_reset_prepare(struct xe_uc *uc);
>  void xe_uc_runtime_resume(struct xe_uc *uc);
>  void xe_uc_runtime_suspend(struct xe_uc *uc);

IMO one change deserves a separate patch
also few nits, but otherwise looks good,

Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-02-03 16:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-28  2:23 [PATCH v7 0/2] drm/xe: Separate out GuC RC code Vinay Belgaumkar
2026-01-28  2:23 ` [PATCH v7 1/2] drm/xe: Decouple GuC RC code from xe_guc_pc Vinay Belgaumkar
2026-02-02  6:27   ` Riana Tauro
2026-02-03 16:46   ` Michal Wajdeczko [this message]
2026-02-04 22:40     ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2026-01-28  2:23 ` [PATCH v7 2/2] drm/xe: Add a wrapper for SLPC set/unset params Vinay Belgaumkar
2026-02-03 16:47   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2026-02-04  0:22     ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2026-01-28  2:32 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/xe: Separate out GuC RC code (rev4) Patchwork
2026-01-28  2:33 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-01-28  3:07 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b677bcb0-7db6-4d87-9318-294e004b0167@intel.com \
    --to=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=riana.tauro@intel.com \
    --cc=vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox