From: "Ghimiray, Himal Prasad" <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
To: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, apopple@nvidia.com,
airlied@gmail.com, "Simona Vetter" <simona.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
felix.kuehling@amd.com, "Matthew Brost" <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
dakr@kernel.org, "Mrozek, Michal" <michal.mrozek@intel.com>,
"Joonas Lahtinen" <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 19/22] drm/gpusvm: Introduce a function to scan the current migration state
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2025 16:51:01 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b70bec9c-da7b-4bff-9a41-b7548ea92518@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251211165909.219710-20-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
On 11-12-2025 22:29, Thomas Hellström wrote:
> With multi-device we are much more likely to have multiple
> drm-gpusvm ranges pointing to the same struct mm range.
>
> To avoid calling into drm_pagemap_populate_mm(), which is always
> very costly, introduce a much less costly drm_gpusvm function,
> drm_gpusvm_scan_mm() to scan the current migration state.
> The device fault-handler and prefetcher can use this function to
> determine whether migration is really necessary.
>
> There are a couple of performance improvements that can be done
> for this function if it turns out to be too costly. Those are
> documented in the code.
>
> v3:
> - New patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gpusvm.c | 121 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/drm/drm_gpusvm.h | 29 +++++++++
> 2 files changed, 150 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gpusvm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gpusvm.c
> index 4c7474a331bc..aa9a0b60e727 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gpusvm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gpusvm.c
> @@ -743,6 +743,127 @@ static bool drm_gpusvm_check_pages(struct drm_gpusvm *gpusvm,
> return err ? false : true;
> }
>
> +/**
> + * drm_gpusvm_scan_mm() - Check the migration state of a drm_gpusvm_range
> + * @range: Pointer to the struct drm_gpusvm_range to check.
> + * @dev_private_owner: The struct dev_private_owner to use to determine
> + * compatible device-private pages.
> + * @pagemap: The struct dev_pagemap pointer to use for pagemap-specific
> + * checks.
> + *
> + * Scan the CPU address space corresponding to @range and return the
> + * current migration state. Note that the result may be invalid as
> + * soon as the function returns. It's an advisory check.
> + *
> + * TODO: Bail early and call hmm_range_fault() for subranges.
> + *
> + * Return: See &enum drm_gpusvm_scan_result.
> + */
> +enum drm_gpusvm_scan_result drm_gpusvm_scan_mm(struct drm_gpusvm_range *range,
> + void *dev_private_owner,
> + const struct dev_pagemap *pagemap)
> +{
> + struct mmu_interval_notifier *notifier = &range->notifier->notifier;
> + unsigned long start = drm_gpusvm_range_start(range);
> + unsigned long end = drm_gpusvm_range_end(range);
> + struct hmm_range hmm_range = {
> + .default_flags = 0,
> + .notifier = notifier,
> + .start = start,
> + .end = end,
> + .dev_private_owner = dev_private_owner,
> + };
> + unsigned long timeout =
> + jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(HMM_RANGE_DEFAULT_TIMEOUT);
> + enum drm_gpusvm_scan_result state = DRM_GPUSVM_SCAN_UNPOPULATED, new_state;
> + unsigned long *pfns;
> + unsigned long npages = npages_in_range(start, end);
> + const struct dev_pagemap *other = NULL;
> + int err, i;
> +
> + pfns = kvmalloc_array(npages, sizeof(*pfns), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!pfns)
> + return DRM_GPUSVM_SCAN_UNPOPULATED;
> +
> + hmm_range.hmm_pfns = pfns;
> +
> +retry:
> + hmm_range.notifier_seq = mmu_interval_read_begin(notifier);
> + mmap_read_lock(range->gpusvm->mm);
> +
> + while (true) {
> + err = hmm_range_fault(&hmm_range);
> + if (err == -EBUSY) {
> + if (time_after(jiffies, timeout))
> + break;
> +
> + hmm_range.notifier_seq =
> + mmu_interval_read_begin(notifier);
> + continue;
> + }
> + break;
> + }
> + mmap_read_unlock(range->gpusvm->mm);
> + if (err)
> + goto err_free;
> +
> + drm_gpusvm_notifier_lock(range->gpusvm);
> + if (mmu_interval_read_retry(notifier, hmm_range.notifier_seq)) {
> + drm_gpusvm_notifier_unlock(range->gpusvm);
> + goto retry;
> + }
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < npages;) {
> + struct page *page;
> + const struct dev_pagemap *cur = NULL;
> +
> + if (!(pfns[i] & HMM_PFN_VALID)) {
> + state = DRM_GPUSVM_SCAN_UNPOPULATED;
> + goto err_free;
> + }
> +
> + page = hmm_pfn_to_page(pfns[i]);
> + if (is_device_private_page(page) ||
> + is_device_coherent_page(page))
> + cur = page_pgmap(page);
> +
> + if (cur == pagemap) {
> + new_state = DRM_GPUSVM_SCAN_EQUAL;
> + } else if (cur && (cur == other || !other)) {
> + new_state = DRM_GPUSVM_SCAN_OTHER;
> + other = cur;
> + } else if (cur) {
> + new_state = DRM_GPUSVM_SCAN_MIXED_DEVICE;
> + } else {
> + new_state = DRM_GPUSVM_SCAN_SYSTEM;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * TODO: Could use an array for state
> + * transitions, and caller might want it
> + * to bail early for some results.
> + */
> + if (state == DRM_GPUSVM_SCAN_UNPOPULATED) {
> + state = new_state;
> + } else if (state != new_state) {
> + if (new_state == DRM_GPUSVM_SCAN_SYSTEM ||
> + state == DRM_GPUSVM_SCAN_SYSTEM)
> + state = DRM_GPUSVM_SCAN_MIXED;
> + else if (state != DRM_GPUSVM_SCAN_MIXED)
> + state = DRM_GPUSVM_SCAN_MIXED_DEVICE;
> + }
> +
> + i += 1ul << drm_gpusvm_hmm_pfn_to_order(pfns[i], i, npages);
> + }
> +
> +err_free:
> + drm_gpusvm_notifier_unlock(range->gpusvm);
> +
> + kvfree(pfns);
> + return state;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_gpusvm_scan_mm);
> +
> /**
> * drm_gpusvm_range_chunk_size() - Determine chunk size for GPU SVM range
> * @gpusvm: Pointer to the GPU SVM structure
> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_gpusvm.h b/include/drm/drm_gpusvm.h
> index 632e100e6efb..2578ac92a8d4 100644
> --- a/include/drm/drm_gpusvm.h
> +++ b/include/drm/drm_gpusvm.h
> @@ -328,6 +328,35 @@ void drm_gpusvm_free_pages(struct drm_gpusvm *gpusvm,
> struct drm_gpusvm_pages *svm_pages,
> unsigned long npages);
>
> +/**
> + * enum drm_gpusvm_scan_result - Scan result from the drm_gpusvm_scan_mm() function.
> + * @DRM_GPUSVM_SCAN_UNPOPULATED: At least one page was not present or inaccessible.
> + * @DRM_GPUSVM_SCAN_EQUAL: All pages belong to the struct dev_pagemap indicated as
> + * the @pagemap argument to the drm_gpusvm_scan_mm() function.
> + * @DRM_GPUSVM_SCAN_OTHER: All pages belong to exactly one dev_pagemap, which is
> + * *NOT* the @pagemap argument to the drm_gpusvm_scan_mm(). All pages belong to
> + * the same device private owner.
> + * @DRM_GPUSVM_SCAN_SYSTEM: All pages are present and system pages.
> + * @DRM_GPUSVM_SCAN_MIXED_DEVICE: All pages are device pages and belong to at least
> + * two different struct dev_pagemaps. All pages belong to the same device private
> + * owner.
> + * @DRM_GPUSVM_SCAN_MIXED: Pages are present and are a mix of system pages
> + * and device-private pages. All device-private pages belong to the same device
> + * private owner.
> + */
> +enum drm_gpusvm_scan_result {
> + DRM_GPUSVM_SCAN_UNPOPULATED,
> + DRM_GPUSVM_SCAN_EQUAL,
> + DRM_GPUSVM_SCAN_OTHER,
> + DRM_GPUSVM_SCAN_SYSTEM,
> + DRM_GPUSVM_SCAN_MIXED_DEVICE,
> + DRM_GPUSVM_SCAN_MIXED,
> +};
> +
Do we really need these enums, wont simply returning whether all pages
in range has same pgmap be sufficient ? Return true or false and use to
decide range needs migration or not.
If we are expecting some further uses cases for these enums, then this
looks OK though.
> +enum drm_gpusvm_scan_result drm_gpusvm_scan_mm(struct drm_gpusvm_range *range,
> + void *dev_private_owner,
> + const struct dev_pagemap *pagemap);
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
> /**
> * drm_gpusvm_driver_set_lock() - Set the lock protecting accesses to GPU SVM
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-12 11:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-11 16:58 [PATCH v4 00/22] Dynamic drm_pagemaps and Initial multi-device SVM Thomas Hellström
2025-12-11 16:58 ` [PATCH v4 01/22] drm/xe/svm: Fix a debug printout Thomas Hellström
2025-12-11 16:58 ` [PATCH v4 02/22] drm/pagemap, drm/xe: Ensure that the devmem allocation is idle before use Thomas Hellström
2025-12-12 8:56 ` Thomas Hellström
2025-12-12 9:24 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-12-12 10:15 ` Thomas Hellström
2025-12-12 10:17 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-12-11 16:58 ` [PATCH v4 03/22] drm/pagemap, drm/xe: Add refcounting to struct drm_pagemap Thomas Hellström
2025-12-12 11:24 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-12-11 16:58 ` [PATCH v4 04/22] drm/pagemap: Add a refcounted drm_pagemap backpointer to struct drm_pagemap_zdd Thomas Hellström
2025-12-11 16:58 ` [PATCH v4 05/22] drm/pagemap, drm/xe: Manage drm_pagemap provider lifetimes Thomas Hellström
2025-12-11 16:58 ` [PATCH v4 06/22] drm/pagemap: Add a drm_pagemap cache and shrinker Thomas Hellström
2025-12-11 16:58 ` [PATCH v4 07/22] drm/xe: Use the " Thomas Hellström
2025-12-11 16:58 ` [PATCH v4 08/22] drm/pagemap: Remove the drm_pagemap_create() interface Thomas Hellström
2025-12-11 16:58 ` [PATCH v4 09/22] drm/pagemap_util: Add a utility to assign an owner to a set of interconnected gpus Thomas Hellström
2025-12-11 16:58 ` [PATCH v4 10/22] drm/xe: Use the drm_pagemap_util helper to get a svm pagemap owner Thomas Hellström
2025-12-11 16:58 ` [PATCH v4 11/22] drm/xe: Pass a drm_pagemap pointer around with the memory advise attributes Thomas Hellström
2025-12-11 16:58 ` [PATCH v4 12/22] drm/xe: Use the vma attibute drm_pagemap to select where to migrate Thomas Hellström
2025-12-12 9:51 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-12-11 16:59 ` [PATCH v4 13/22] drm/xe: Simplify madvise_preferred_mem_loc() Thomas Hellström
2025-12-11 16:59 ` [PATCH v4 14/22] drm/xe/uapi: Extend the madvise functionality to support foreign pagemap placement for svm Thomas Hellström
2025-12-11 16:59 ` [PATCH v4 15/22] drm/xe: Support pcie p2p dma as a fast interconnect Thomas Hellström
2025-12-11 16:59 ` [PATCH v4 16/22] drm/xe/vm: Add a couple of VM debug printouts Thomas Hellström
2025-12-11 16:59 ` [PATCH v4 17/22] drm/xe/svm: Document how xe keeps drm_pagemap references Thomas Hellström
2025-12-11 16:59 ` [PATCH v4 18/22] drm/pagemap, drm/xe: Clean up the use of the device-private page owner Thomas Hellström
2025-12-12 10:09 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-12-11 16:59 ` [PATCH v4 19/22] drm/gpusvm: Introduce a function to scan the current migration state Thomas Hellström
2025-12-12 11:21 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad [this message]
2025-12-12 11:35 ` Thomas Hellström
2025-12-16 0:58 ` Matthew Brost
2025-12-16 23:55 ` Matthew Brost
2025-12-17 6:57 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-12-11 16:59 ` [PATCH v4 20/22] drm/xe: Use drm_gpusvm_scan_mm() Thomas Hellström
2025-12-16 1:06 ` Matthew Brost
2025-12-17 6:58 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-12-11 16:59 ` [PATCH v4 21/22] drm/pagemap, drm/xe: Support destination migration over interconnect Thomas Hellström
2025-12-18 1:20 ` Matthew Brost
2025-12-18 2:29 ` Matthew Brost
2025-12-18 9:09 ` Thomas Hellström
2025-12-18 9:04 ` Thomas Hellström
2025-12-11 16:59 ` [PATCH v4 22/22] drm/pagemap: Support source " Thomas Hellström
2025-12-11 18:03 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Dynamic drm_pagemaps and Initial multi-device SVM (rev5) Patchwork
2025-12-11 18:05 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-12-11 18:49 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-12-12 8:08 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b70bec9c-da7b-4bff-9a41-b7548ea92518@intel.com \
--to=himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=felix.kuehling@amd.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=michal.mrozek@intel.com \
--cc=simona.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox