From: "Nautiyal, Ankit K" <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
To: "Kandpal, Suraj" <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>,
"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: "intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/10] drm/i915/vdsc: Add support for read/write PPS for DSC3
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 17:44:56 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ba59dff3-7ac1-4300-9397-051c50bb6254@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SN7PR11MB675053E11032DB03A558DA63E3402@SN7PR11MB6750.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Hi Suraj,
Thanks for the review and comments.
I agree with most of the comments on the series and will send new
version with those addressed.
Please find my explanation inline for your query:
On 10/18/2024 7:47 AM, Kandpal, Suraj wrote:
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Nautiyal, Ankit K <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
>> Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2024 1:54 PM
>> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
>> Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org; Kandpal, Suraj
>> <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
>> Subject: [PATCH 04/10] drm/i915/vdsc: Add support for read/write PPS for
>> DSC3
>>
>> With BMG each pipe has 3 DSC engines, so add bits to read/write the PPS
>> registers for the 3rd VDSC engine.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c | 8 +++++---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc_regs.h | 6 ++++++
>> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c
>> index e34483d5be36..718e1b400af5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c
>> @@ -411,8 +411,10 @@ static void intel_dsc_get_pps_reg(const struct
>> intel_crtc_state *crtc_state, int
>>
>> pipe_dsc = is_pipe_dsc(crtc, cpu_transcoder);
>>
>> - if (dsc_reg_num >= 3)
>> + if (dsc_reg_num >= 4)
>> MISSING_CASE(dsc_reg_num);
>> + if (dsc_reg_num >= 3)
>> + dsc_reg[2] = BMG_DSC2_PPS(pipe, pps);
>> if (dsc_reg_num >= 2)
> Quick question why is this condition not == that would make sense only the first condition
> Should have been >=
We want to set dsc_reg[1] for case where dsc_reg_num is 2 as well as
when its 3 as we need to write PPS for 3 DSC engines.
Changing to 'if (dsc_reg_num == 2)' will only set dsc_reg[2], but skip
dsc_reg[1] when dsc_reg_num is 3.
Thanks & Regards,
Ankit
> Maybe another patch to fix this
> Rest LGTM,
> Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
>
>> dsc_reg[1] = pipe_dsc ? ICL_DSC1_PPS(pipe, pps) :
>> DSCC_PPS(pps);
>> if (dsc_reg_num >= 1)
>> @@ -424,7 +426,7 @@ static void intel_dsc_pps_write(const struct
>> intel_crtc_state *crtc_state, {
>> struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->uapi.crtc);
>> struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
>> - i915_reg_t dsc_reg[2];
>> + i915_reg_t dsc_reg[3];
>> int i, vdsc_per_pipe, dsc_reg_num;
>>
>> vdsc_per_pipe = intel_dsc_get_vdsc_per_pipe(crtc_state);
>> @@ -824,7 +826,7 @@ static u32 intel_dsc_pps_read(struct intel_crtc_state
>> *crtc_state, int pps, {
>> struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->uapi.crtc);
>> struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
>> - i915_reg_t dsc_reg[2];
>> + i915_reg_t dsc_reg[3];
>> int i, vdsc_per_pipe, dsc_reg_num;
>> u32 val;
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc_regs.h
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc_regs.h
>> index 941f4ff6b940..efaeb5e0aea3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc_regs.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc_regs.h
>> @@ -61,8 +61,10 @@
>> #define DSCC_PPS(pps) _MMIO(_DSCC_PPS_0
>> + ((pps) < 12 ? (pps) : (pps) + 12) * 4)
>> #define _ICL_DSC0_PICTURE_PARAMETER_SET_0_PB 0x78270
>> #define _ICL_DSC1_PICTURE_PARAMETER_SET_0_PB 0x78370
>> +#define _BMG_DSC2_PICTURE_PARAMETER_SET_0_PB 0x78970
>> #define _ICL_DSC0_PICTURE_PARAMETER_SET_0_PC 0x78470
>> #define _ICL_DSC1_PICTURE_PARAMETER_SET_0_PC 0x78570
>> +#define _BMG_DSC2_PICTURE_PARAMETER_SET_0_PC 0x78A70
>> #define ICL_DSC0_PICTURE_PARAMETER_SET_0(pipe) _MMIO_PIPE((pipe) -
>> PIPE_B, \
>>
>> _ICL_DSC0_PICTURE_PARAMETER_SET_0_PB, \
>>
>> _ICL_DSC0_PICTURE_PARAMETER_SET_0_PC)
>> @@ -75,8 +77,12 @@
>> #define _ICL_DSC1_PPS_0(pipe) _PICK_EVEN((pipe) -
>> PIPE_B, \
>>
>> _ICL_DSC1_PICTURE_PARAMETER_SET_0_PB, \
>>
>> _ICL_DSC1_PICTURE_PARAMETER_SET_0_PC)
>> +#define _BMG_DSC2_PPS_0(pipe) _PICK_EVEN((pipe) -
>> PIPE_B, \
>> +
>> _BMG_DSC2_PICTURE_PARAMETER_SET_0_PB, \
>> +
>> _BMG_DSC2_PICTURE_PARAMETER_SET_0_PC)
>> #define ICL_DSC0_PPS(pipe, pps)
>> _MMIO(_ICL_DSC0_PPS_0(pipe) + ((pps) * 4))
>> #define ICL_DSC1_PPS(pipe, pps)
>> _MMIO(_ICL_DSC1_PPS_0(pipe) + ((pps) * 4))
>> +#define BMG_DSC2_PPS(pipe, pps)
>> _MMIO(_BMG_DSC2_PPS_0(pipe) + ((pps) * 4))
>>
>> /* PPS 0 */
>> #define DSC_PPS0_NATIVE_422_ENABLE REG_BIT(23)
>> --
>> 2.45.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-21 12:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-17 8:23 [PATCH 00/10] Add support for 3 VDSC engines 12 slices Ankit Nautiyal
2024-10-17 8:23 ` [PATCH 01/10] drm/i915/display: Prepare for dsc 3 stream splitter Ankit Nautiyal
2024-10-17 8:58 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2024-10-17 8:23 ` [PATCH 02/10] drm/i915/vdsc: Use VDSC0/VDSC1 for LEFT/RIGHT VDSC engine Ankit Nautiyal
2024-10-17 9:04 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2024-10-17 8:23 ` [PATCH 03/10] drm/i915/vdsc: Add register bits for VDSC2 engine Ankit Nautiyal
2024-10-17 9:10 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2024-10-17 8:23 ` [PATCH 04/10] drm/i915/vdsc: Add support for read/write PPS for DSC3 Ankit Nautiyal
2024-10-18 2:17 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2024-10-21 12:14 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K [this message]
2024-10-17 8:23 ` [PATCH 05/10] drm/i915/dp: Add check for hdisplay divisible by slice count Ankit Nautiyal
2024-10-17 9:45 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2024-10-17 8:23 ` [PATCH 06/10] drm/i915/display: Add DSC pixel replication Ankit Nautiyal
2024-10-17 9:33 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2024-10-24 22:18 ` kernel test robot
2024-10-17 8:23 ` [PATCH 07/10] drm/i915/dp: Compute pixel replication count for DSC 12 slices case Ankit Nautiyal
2024-10-17 9:44 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2024-10-17 8:23 ` [PATCH 08/10] drm/i915/display: Account for pixel replication in pipe_src Ankit Nautiyal
2024-10-17 8:23 ` [PATCH 09/10] drm/i915/dsc: Account for Odd pixel removal Ankit Nautiyal
2024-10-17 8:23 ` [PATCH 10/10] drm/i915/dp: Add support for 3 vdsc engines and 12 slices Ankit Nautiyal
2024-10-17 8:42 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Add support for 3 VDSC engines 12 slices (rev3) Patchwork
2024-10-17 8:42 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-10-17 8:43 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-10-17 8:55 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-10-17 8:57 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-10-17 8:59 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2024-10-17 9:24 ` ✓ CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2024-10-17 18:15 ` ✗ CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ba59dff3-7ac1-4300-9397-051c50bb6254@intel.com \
--to=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=suraj.kandpal@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox