Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Hogander, Jouni" <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
To: "intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"Sousa,  Gustavo" <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>,
	"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Write PHY_CMN1_CONTROL only when using AUXLess ALPM
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2025 06:05:24 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bac5a94acb4cc814a56855be54c2b5e69ab573fe.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <175275909975.1809.8747168482147911326@intel.com>

On Thu, 2025-07-17 at 10:31 -0300, Gustavo Sousa wrote:
> Quoting Jouni Högander (2025-07-17 03:32:58-03:00)
> > We are seeing "dmesg-warn/abort - *ERROR* PHY * failed after 3
> > retries"
> > since we started configuring LFPS sending. According to Bspec
> > Configuring
> > LFPS sending is needed only when using AUXLess ALPM. This patch
> > avoids
> > these failures by configuring LFPS sending only when using AUXLess
> > ALPM.
> 
> Hm... But then with this patch we are missing writing zero to that
> bit
> when necessary, no?

That shouldn't be necessary as 0 is the reset value.

> 
> Could the timeouts be happening because intel_cx0_rmw() is getting
> called without calling
> intel_cx0_phy_transaction_begin()/intel_cx0_phy_transaction_end()?

I wasn't aware about these. I will try them.

BR,

Jouni Högander

> 
> > 
> > Fixes: 9dc619680de4 ("drm/i915/display: Add function to configure
> > LFPS sending")
> > Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy.c | 11 +++++------
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy.c
> > index ed8e640b96b0..9cfc3187aeab 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy.c
> > @@ -3239,14 +3239,14 @@ void intel_lnl_mac_transmit_lfps(struct
> > intel_encoder *encoder,
> >                                  const struct intel_crtc_state
> > *crtc_state)
> > {
> >         struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(encoder);
> > -        u8 owned_lane_mask =
> > intel_cx0_get_owned_lane_mask(encoder);
> > -        bool enable =
> > intel_alpm_is_alpm_aux_less(enc_to_intel_dp(encoder),
> > -                                                  crtc_state);
> > +        u8 owned_lane_mask;
> >         int i;
> > 
> > -        if (DISPLAY_VER(display) < 20)
> > +        if (DISPLAY_VER(display) < 20 ||
> > +            !intel_alpm_is_alpm_aux_less(enc_to_intel_dp(encoder),
> > crtc_state))
> >                 return;
> > 
> > +        owned_lane_mask = intel_cx0_get_owned_lane_mask(encoder);
> 
> This optimization could be on it's own patch.
> 
> --
> Gustavo Sousa
> 
> >         for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
> >                 int tx = i % 2 + 1;
> >                 u8 lane_mask = i < 2 ? INTEL_CX0_LANE0 :
> > INTEL_CX0_LANE1;
> > @@ -3256,8 +3256,7 @@ void intel_lnl_mac_transmit_lfps(struct
> > intel_encoder *encoder,
> > 
> >                 intel_cx0_rmw(encoder, lane_mask,
> > PHY_CMN1_CONTROL(tx, 0),
> >                               CONTROL0_MAC_TRANSMIT_LFPS,
> > -                              enable ? CONTROL0_MAC_TRANSMIT_LFPS
> > : 0,
> > -                              MB_WRITE_COMMITTED);
> > +                              CONTROL0_MAC_TRANSMIT_LFPS,
> > MB_WRITE_COMMITTED);
> >         }
> > }
> > 
> > -- 
> > 2.43.0
> > 


  reply	other threads:[~2025-07-18  6:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-17  6:32 [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Write PHY_CMN1_CONTROL only when using AUXLess ALPM Jouni Högander
2025-07-17  7:15 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for " Patchwork
2025-07-17  8:22 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-07-17 13:31 ` [PATCH] " Gustavo Sousa
2025-07-18  6:05   ` Hogander, Jouni [this message]
2025-07-18 10:46     ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-07-18 12:58       ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-07-18 13:08         ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-07-18 13:45           ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-07-22  8:56             ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-07-18 10:30 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure for " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bac5a94acb4cc814a56855be54c2b5e69ab573fe.camel@intel.com \
    --to=jouni.hogander@intel.com \
    --cc=gustavo.sousa@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox