From: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
To: Sanjay Yadav <sanjay.kumar.yadav@intel.com>,
intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/xe/uapi: Add documentation for DRM_XE_GEM_CREATE_FLAG_SCANOUT
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2025 09:47:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <baedfa4e-3ace-446b-bbf5-ceabf41f600e@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251014142823.3701228-2-sanjay.kumar.yadav@intel.com>
On 14/10/2025 15:28, Sanjay Yadav wrote:
> Add documentation for drm_xe_gem_create structure flag
> DRM_XE_GEM_CREATE_FLAG_SCANOUT.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sanjay Yadav <sanjay.kumar.yadav@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
> ---
> include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h
> index 40ff19f52a8d..2d7945cda739 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h
> @@ -771,7 +771,11 @@ struct drm_xe_device_query {
> * until the object is either bound to a virtual memory region via
> * VM_BIND or accessed by the CPU. As a result, no backing memory is
> * reserved at the time of GEM object creation.
> - * - %DRM_XE_GEM_CREATE_FLAG_SCANOUT
> + * - %DRM_XE_GEM_CREATE_FLAG_SCANOUT - Indicates that the GEM object is
> + * intended for scanout via the display engine. When set, kernel ensures
> + * that the allocation is placed in a memory region compatible with the
> + * display engine requirements. This may impose restrictions on tiling,
> + * alignment, and memory placement to guarantee proper display functionality.
> * - %DRM_XE_GEM_CREATE_FLAG_NEEDS_VISIBLE_VRAM - When using VRAM as a
> * possible placement, ensure that the corresponding VRAM allocation
> * will always use the CPU accessible part of VRAM. This is important
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-15 8:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-14 14:28 [PATCH] drm/xe/uapi: Add documentation for DRM_XE_GEM_CREATE_FLAG_SCANOUT Sanjay Yadav
2025-10-14 14:39 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for " Patchwork
2025-10-14 15:14 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-10-15 0:24 ` ✓ Xe.CI.Full: " Patchwork
2025-10-15 8:47 ` Matthew Auld [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=baedfa4e-3ace-446b-bbf5-ceabf41f600e@intel.com \
--to=matthew.auld@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=sanjay.kumar.yadav@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox