From: "Tauro, Riana" <riana.tauro@intel.com>
To: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>, <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: <matthew.brost@intel.com>, <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
<thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>, <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>,
<matthew.d.roper@intel.com>, <michal.winiarski@intel.com>,
<matthew.auld@intel.com>, <dev@lankhorst.se>,
<jani.nikula@intel.com>, <lukasz.laguna@intel.com>,
<lukas@wunner.de>, <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>,
<badal.nilawar@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 09/10] drm/xe/pci: Introduce PCIe Function Level Reset
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2026 14:10:12 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bb04d592-282f-46ed-82eb-86d8d90d95b8@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261026050735.566613-10-raag.jadav@intel.com>
On 26-10-2026 10:36, Raag Jadav wrote:
> With bare minimum pieces in place, we can finally introduce PCIe Function
> Level Reset (FLR) support which re-initializes hardware state without the
> need for reloading the driver from userspace. All VRAM contents are lost
> along with hardware state and driver takes care of recreating the required
> kernel bos as part of re-initialization, but user still needs to recreate
> user bos and reload context after PCIe FLR.
>
> Signed-off-by: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>
> Tested-by: Lukasz Laguna <lukasz.laguna@intel.com>
> Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> ---
> v2: Spell out Function Level Reset (Jani)
> v5: Prevent PM ref leak for wedged device (Matthew Brost)
> v6: Add PCIe FLR documentation (Daniele)
> v7: Refine PCIe FLR documentation (Daniele)
> Introduce xe_pci_reset_skip() helper (Lukasz)
> v9: Add 'Xe' prefix to document title (Rodrigo)
> v10: Update documentation to include PCI Error Handling (Lukasz)
> Maintain wedge reference on FLR failure (Lukasz)
> v11: Cleanup wedge reference logic in ->reset_prepare() (Lukasz)
> Use 'PCI reset' in logs (Riana)
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h | 3 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci_error.c | 134 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 137 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h
> index 0eb36fd91539..73028a45f677 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h
> @@ -521,6 +521,9 @@ struct xe_device {
> /** @pxp: Encapsulate Protected Xe Path support */
> struct xe_pxp *pxp;
>
> + /** @flr_prepared: Prepared for function-reset */
> + bool flr_prepared;
> +
> /** @needs_flr_on_fini: requests function-reset on fini */
> bool needs_flr_on_fini;
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci_error.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci_error.c
> index cdd0af4ec139..3ec687256309 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci_error.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci_error.c
> @@ -12,9 +12,55 @@
> #include "xe_pm.h"
> #include "xe_printk.h"
> #include "xe_ras.h"
> +#include "xe_sriov_pf_helpers.h"
> #include "xe_survivability_mode.h"
> #include "xe_wedge.h"
>
> +/**
> + * DOC: Xe PCI Error Handling
> + *
> + * Xe driver registers PCI callbacks which are called by PCI core in case of
> + * bus errors or resets.
> + *
> + * Currently both Function Level Reset (FLR) and bus error handling callbacks are
> + * supported. Both wipe the VRAM and resets the state of all the hardware units.
> + * Therefore, the contents of all exec queues and BOs in VRAM are lost, and the
> + * hardware needs a full re-initialization. The way Xe driver handles it, is
> + * pretty much similar to system suspend/resume flow with a few notable exceptions.
> + *
> + * Prepare phase:
> + *
> + * - Temporarily wedge the device to prevent userspace access
> + * - Kill exec queues which signals all fences and frees in-flight jobs
> + * - Stop the scheduler and all submissions to GuC
> + * - The fact that FLR is needed is because hardware could be in corrupted state
> + * and access unreliable, so skip memory eviction due to untrustworthy VRAM
> + * contents
> + * - Remove all memory mappings since VRAM contents will be lost
> + *
> + * Re-initialization phase:
> + *
> + * - Recreate kernel BOs due to skipped memory eviction in prepare phase
> + * - Restore kernel queues which were killed in prepare phase
> + * - Reload all uC firmwares
> + * - Bring up all hardware units
> + * - Unwedge the device to allow userspace access
> + *
> + * Since VRAM contents are lost, the user is expected to recreate user memory
> + * and reload context.
> + *
> + * TODO: Reuse FLR callbacks for bus error handling.
> + *
> + * Current implementation is only limited to re-initializing GT. This needs to
> + * be extended for a lot of components listed below.
> + *
> + * - Proper re-initialization of GSC and PXP for integrated platforms
> + * - SR-IOV cases which need PF and VF synchronization
> + * - Re-initialization of all child devices registered by Xe
> + * - MM corner cases
> + * - Display
> + */
> +
> static void prepare_device_for_reset(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> {
> struct xe_device *xe = pdev_to_xe_device(pdev);
> @@ -153,9 +199,97 @@ static void xe_pci_error_resume(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> xe_wedge_put(xe);
> }
>
> +static inline bool xe_pci_reset_skip(struct xe_device *xe)
> +{
> + return !IS_DGFX(xe) || IS_SRIOV_VF(xe) || xe_sriov_pf_num_vfs(xe) || xe->info.probe_display;
> +}
> +
> +static void xe_pci_reset_prepare(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> + struct xe_device *xe = pdev_to_xe_device(pdev);
> + int err;
> +
> + /* No guarantees by PCI core */
> + if (!pm_runtime_active(&pdev->dev))
> + return;
Add a log here. xe_dbg should also be okay
> +
> + err = xe_wedged(xe);
> + if (err)
> + xe_err(xe, "PCI reset failed, device in unexpected state\n");
> +
> + /* Wedge the device to prevent userspace access but don't send the event yet */
> + xe_wedge_get(xe);
> + if (err)
> + return;
> +
> + err = xe_pci_reset_skip(xe);
> + if (err) {
> + xe_err(xe, "PCI reset not supported\n");
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * The hardware could be in corrupted state and access unreliable, but we try to
> + * update data structures and cleanup any pending work to avoid side effects during
> + * PCIe FLR. This will be similar to system suspend flow but without eviction.
> + */
> + err = xe_device_suspend(xe, true);
> + if (err) {
> + xe_err(xe, "Failed to prepare for PCI reset\n");
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + xe->flr_prepared = true;
> + xe_info(xe, "Prepared for PCI reset\n");
> +}
> +
> +static void xe_pci_reset_done(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> + struct xe_device *xe = pdev_to_xe_device(pdev);
> + int err;
> +
> + /* No guarantees by PCI core */
> + if (!pm_runtime_active(&pdev->dev))
> + return;
Same
> +
> + err = xe_pci_reset_skip(xe);
> + if (err)
> + goto out;
> +
> + if (!xe->flr_prepared)
> + goto out;
> +
> + /* Unprepare early in case we fail */
> + xe->flr_prepared = false;
> +
> + /*
> + * We already have the data structures intact, so try to re-initialize the device.
> + * This will be similar to system resume flow, except we'll also need to recreate
> + * kernel bos and restore kernel queues.
> + */
> + err = xe_device_resume(xe, true);
> + if (err) {
> + xe_err(xe, "Re-initialization failed\n");
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + /* Unwedge to allow userspace access */
> + xe_wedge_put(xe);
> + xe_info(xe, "Re-initialization success\n");
Add PCI reset in log. Maybe PCI reset done
With the above logs added
Reviewed-by: Riana Tauro <riana.tauro@intel.com>
> +
> + return;
> +out:
> + /* Most likely the device is unusable and there's nothing we can do about it */
> + xe_wedge_declare(xe, DRM_WEDGE_RECOVERY_REBIND | DRM_WEDGE_RECOVERY_BUS_RESET);
> + /* Drop local reference */
> + xe_wedge_put(xe);
> +}
> +
> const struct pci_error_handlers xe_pci_error_handlers = {
> .error_detected = xe_pci_error_detected,
> .mmio_enabled = xe_pci_error_mmio_enabled,
> .slot_reset = xe_pci_error_slot_reset,
> .resume = xe_pci_error_resume,
> + .reset_prepare = xe_pci_reset_prepare,
> + .reset_done = xe_pci_reset_done,
> };
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-29 8:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-26 5:06 [PATCH v11 00/10] Introduce Xe PCIe FLR Raag Jadav
2026-10-26 5:06 ` [PATCH v11 01/10] drm/xe/uc_fw: Allow re-initializing firmware Raag Jadav
2026-10-26 5:06 ` [PATCH v11 02/10] drm/xe/guc_submit: Introduce guc_exec_queue_reinit_kernel() Raag Jadav
2026-10-26 5:06 ` [PATCH v11 03/10] drm/xe/gt: Introduce FLR helpers Raag Jadav
2026-10-26 5:06 ` [PATCH v11 04/10] drm/xe/bo_evict: Introduce xe_bo_restore_map() Raag Jadav
2026-10-26 5:06 ` [PATCH v11 05/10] drm/xe/exec_queue: Introduce xe_exec_queue_reinit() Raag Jadav
2026-10-26 5:06 ` [PATCH v11 06/10] drm/xe/migrate: Introduce xe_migrate_reinit() Raag Jadav
2026-10-26 5:06 ` [PATCH v11 07/10] drm/xe/pm: Introduce xe_device_suspend/resume() Raag Jadav
2026-10-26 5:06 ` [PATCH v11 08/10] drm/xe: Introduce temporary device wedging Raag Jadav
2026-10-29 6:14 ` Tauro, Riana
2026-10-29 8:20 ` Raag Jadav
2026-10-26 5:06 ` [PATCH v11 09/10] drm/xe/pci: Introduce PCIe Function Level Reset Raag Jadav
2026-10-29 8:40 ` Tauro, Riana [this message]
2026-10-26 5:07 ` [PATCH v11 10/10] drm/xe/doc: Wire up PCI Error Handling Raag Jadav
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bb04d592-282f-46ed-82eb-86d8d90d95b8@intel.com \
--to=riana.tauro@intel.com \
--cc=badal.nilawar@intel.com \
--cc=daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com \
--cc=dev@lankhorst.se \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=lukasz.laguna@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--cc=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
--cc=michal.winiarski@intel.com \
--cc=raag.jadav@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox