From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Vinod Govindapillai <vinod.govindapillai@intel.com>,
intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: vinod.govindapillai@intel.com, imre.deak@intel.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/5] drm/i915/display: add pme_capable() to the parent interface
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2026 13:19:20 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bb80200efea31ed150318deaa8622d8efddb2666@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260816224005.886035-3-vinod.govindapillai@intel.com>
On Mon, 17 Aug 2026, Vinod Govindapillai <vinod.govindapillai@intel.com> wrote:
> Add a provision to query the optional pme_capability to the parent
> interface so that it could be called independently from xe or i915
> based on the implementation.
But do we need this? Display has all the information to call
pci_dev_run_wake() directly, without going through the parent interface.
The only difference is this is not being set up for i915.
BR,
Jani.
>
> Assisted-by: GitHub_Copilot:claude-opus-5
> Signed-off-by: Vinod Govindapillai <vinod.govindapillai@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_rpm.c | 7 +++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_rpm.h | 1 +
> include/drm/intel/display_parent_interface.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_rpm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_rpm.c
> index 0a331f89b4db..73d85384474e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_rpm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_rpm.c
> @@ -46,6 +46,13 @@ bool intel_display_rpm_suspended(struct intel_display *display)
> return display->parent->rpm->suspended(display->drm);
> }
>
> +bool intel_display_rpm_pme_capable(struct intel_display *display)
> +{
> + const struct intel_display_rpm_interface *rpm = display->parent->rpm;
> +
> + return rpm->pme_capable && rpm->pme_capable(display->drm);
> +}
> +
> void assert_display_rpm_held(struct intel_display *display)
> {
> display->parent->rpm->assert_held(display->drm);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_rpm.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_rpm.h
> index 6ef48515f84b..2d4071fb9282 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_rpm.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_rpm.h
> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ void intel_display_rpm_put(struct intel_display *display, struct ref_tracker *wa
>
> /* Only for special cases. */
> bool intel_display_rpm_suspended(struct intel_display *display);
> +bool intel_display_rpm_pme_capable(struct intel_display *display);
>
> void assert_display_rpm_held(struct intel_display *display);
> void intel_display_rpm_assert_block(struct intel_display *display);
> diff --git a/include/drm/intel/display_parent_interface.h b/include/drm/intel/display_parent_interface.h
> index d7d06dcaa699..563de403b102 100644
> --- a/include/drm/intel/display_parent_interface.h
> +++ b/include/drm/intel/display_parent_interface.h
> @@ -196,6 +196,7 @@ struct intel_display_rpm_interface {
> void (*put_unchecked)(const struct drm_device *drm);
>
> bool (*suspended)(const struct drm_device *drm);
> + bool (*pme_capable)(const struct drm_device *drm); /* Optional */
> void (*assert_held)(const struct drm_device *drm);
> void (*assert_block)(const struct drm_device *drm);
> void (*assert_unblock)(const struct drm_device *drm);
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-17 10:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-16 22:39 [RFC PATCH 0/5] pm_pme support on display hotplug Vinod Govindapillai
2026-08-16 22:40 ` [RFC PATCH 1/5] drm/xe/pm: add xe_pm_pme_supported() helper Vinod Govindapillai
2026-08-17 10:17 ` Jani Nikula
2026-08-16 22:40 ` [RFC PATCH 2/5] drm/i915/display: add pme_capable() to the parent interface Vinod Govindapillai
2026-08-17 10:19 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2026-08-16 22:40 ` [RFC PATCH 3/5] drm/i915/xe: plug the pme_capability query for xe Vinod Govindapillai
2026-08-16 22:40 ` [RFC PATCH 4/5] drm/i915/display: add intel_hpd_polling_enabled() Vinod Govindapillai
2026-08-16 22:40 ` [RFC PATCH 5/5] drm/i915/display: skip HPD polling if PME is supported Vinod Govindapillai
2026-08-16 22:52 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-17 10:15 ` Jani Nikula
2026-08-16 22:48 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for pm_pme support on display hotplug Patchwork
2026-08-16 23:26 ` ✗ Xe.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bb80200efea31ed150318deaa8622d8efddb2666@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=vinod.govindapillai@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox