Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Vinod Govindapillai <vinod.govindapillai@intel.com>,
	intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: vinod.govindapillai@intel.com, imre.deak@intel.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/5] drm/i915/display: add pme_capable() to the parent interface
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2026 13:19:20 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bb80200efea31ed150318deaa8622d8efddb2666@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260816224005.886035-3-vinod.govindapillai@intel.com>

On Mon, 17 Aug 2026, Vinod Govindapillai <vinod.govindapillai@intel.com> wrote:
> Add a provision to query the optional pme_capability to the parent
> interface so that it could be called independently from xe or i915
> based on the implementation.

But do we need this? Display has all the information to call
pci_dev_run_wake() directly, without going through the parent interface.

The only difference is this is not being set up for i915.

BR,
Jani.

>
> Assisted-by: GitHub_Copilot:claude-opus-5
> Signed-off-by: Vinod Govindapillai <vinod.govindapillai@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_rpm.c | 7 +++++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_rpm.h | 1 +
>  include/drm/intel/display_parent_interface.h     | 1 +
>  3 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_rpm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_rpm.c
> index 0a331f89b4db..73d85384474e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_rpm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_rpm.c
> @@ -46,6 +46,13 @@ bool intel_display_rpm_suspended(struct intel_display *display)
>  	return display->parent->rpm->suspended(display->drm);
>  }
>  
> +bool intel_display_rpm_pme_capable(struct intel_display *display)
> +{
> +	const struct intel_display_rpm_interface *rpm = display->parent->rpm;
> +
> +	return rpm->pme_capable && rpm->pme_capable(display->drm);
> +}
> +
>  void assert_display_rpm_held(struct intel_display *display)
>  {
>  	display->parent->rpm->assert_held(display->drm);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_rpm.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_rpm.h
> index 6ef48515f84b..2d4071fb9282 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_rpm.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_rpm.h
> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ void intel_display_rpm_put(struct intel_display *display, struct ref_tracker *wa
>  
>  /* Only for special cases. */
>  bool intel_display_rpm_suspended(struct intel_display *display);
> +bool intel_display_rpm_pme_capable(struct intel_display *display);
>  
>  void assert_display_rpm_held(struct intel_display *display);
>  void intel_display_rpm_assert_block(struct intel_display *display);
> diff --git a/include/drm/intel/display_parent_interface.h b/include/drm/intel/display_parent_interface.h
> index d7d06dcaa699..563de403b102 100644
> --- a/include/drm/intel/display_parent_interface.h
> +++ b/include/drm/intel/display_parent_interface.h
> @@ -196,6 +196,7 @@ struct intel_display_rpm_interface {
>  	void (*put_unchecked)(const struct drm_device *drm);
>  
>  	bool (*suspended)(const struct drm_device *drm);
> +	bool (*pme_capable)(const struct drm_device *drm); /* Optional */
>  	void (*assert_held)(const struct drm_device *drm);
>  	void (*assert_block)(const struct drm_device *drm);
>  	void (*assert_unblock)(const struct drm_device *drm);

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-17 10:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-16 22:39 [RFC PATCH 0/5] pm_pme support on display hotplug Vinod Govindapillai
2026-08-16 22:40 ` [RFC PATCH 1/5] drm/xe/pm: add xe_pm_pme_supported() helper Vinod Govindapillai
2026-08-17 10:17   ` Jani Nikula
2026-08-16 22:40 ` [RFC PATCH 2/5] drm/i915/display: add pme_capable() to the parent interface Vinod Govindapillai
2026-08-17 10:19   ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2026-08-16 22:40 ` [RFC PATCH 3/5] drm/i915/xe: plug the pme_capability query for xe Vinod Govindapillai
2026-08-16 22:40 ` [RFC PATCH 4/5] drm/i915/display: add intel_hpd_polling_enabled() Vinod Govindapillai
2026-08-16 22:40 ` [RFC PATCH 5/5] drm/i915/display: skip HPD polling if PME is supported Vinod Govindapillai
2026-08-16 22:52   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-17 10:15   ` Jani Nikula
2026-08-16 22:48 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for pm_pme support on display hotplug Patchwork
2026-08-16 23:26 ` ✗ Xe.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bb80200efea31ed150318deaa8622d8efddb2666@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=imre.deak@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=vinod.govindapillai@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox