public inbox for intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
To: rob.clark@oss.qualcomm.com
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org,
	"Felix Kuehling" <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>,
	"Alex Deucher" <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	"David Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
	"Simona Vetter" <simona@ffwll.ch>,
	"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
	"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
	"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	"Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>,
	"Matthew Brost" <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
	"Alice Ryhl" <aliceryhl@google.com>,
	"Dmitry Baryshkov" <lumag@kernel.org>,
	"Abhinav Kumar" <abhinav.kumar@linux.dev>,
	"Jessica Zhang" <jesszhan0024@gmail.com>,
	"Sean Paul" <sean@poorly.run>,
	"Marijn Suijten" <marijn.suijten@somainline.org>,
	amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] drm/msm: Remove abuse of drm_exec internals
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2026 21:52:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bd45632be1a5bcd2ce34834b45a35254e23f7679.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACSVV03FFvi0c4XMEShmH5ou4OKKZcvvni2j=0DBoYnuT55ecQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, 2026-03-31 at 12:08 -0700, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2026 at 2:21 AM Thomas Hellström
> <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > 
> > The code was reading drm_exec internal state to determine whether
> > the drm_exec structure had been initialized or not, and therefore
> > needed cleaning up, relying on undocumented behaviour.
> > 
> > Instead add a bool to struct msm_gem_submit to indicate whether
> > drm_exec cleaning up is needed.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Rob Clark <rob.clark@oss.qualcomm.com>
> 
> This is pretty stand-alone, so I can pick it up for v7.1.  Or ack for
> landing it via drm-misc with the rest of the series if that is easier
> for you.  It shouldn't conflict with anything in flight.

Thanks Rob. Please pick it up and I'll exclude it from the next
iteration of the series.

Thanks,
Thomas

> 
> BR,
> -R
> 
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.h        | 1 +
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_submit.c | 4 +++-
> >  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.h
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.h
> > index cb32093fda47..762e546d25ef 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.h
> > @@ -452,6 +452,7 @@ struct msm_gem_submit {
> >         bool bos_pinned : 1;
> >         bool fault_dumped:1;/* Limit devcoredump dumping to one per
> > submit */
> >         bool in_rb : 1;     /* "sudo" mode, copy cmds into RB */
> > +       bool has_exec : 1;  /* @exec is initialized. */
> >         struct msm_ringbuffer *ring;
> >         unsigned int nr_cmds;
> >         unsigned int nr_bos;
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_submit.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_submit.c
> > index 75d9f3574370..26ea8a28be47 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_submit.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_submit.c
> > @@ -278,6 +278,7 @@ static int submit_lock_objects_vmbind(struct
> > msm_gem_submit *submit)
> >         int ret = 0;
> > 
> >         drm_exec_init(&submit->exec, flags, submit->nr_bos);
> > +       submit->has_exec = true;
> > 
> >         drm_exec_until_all_locked (&submit->exec) {
> >                 ret = drm_gpuvm_prepare_vm(submit->vm, exec, 1);
> > @@ -304,6 +305,7 @@ static int submit_lock_objects(struct
> > msm_gem_submit *submit)
> >                 return submit_lock_objects_vmbind(submit);
> > 
> >         drm_exec_init(&submit->exec, flags, submit->nr_bos);
> > +       submit->has_exec = true;
> > 
> >         drm_exec_until_all_locked (&submit->exec) {
> >                 ret = drm_exec_lock_obj(&submit->exec,
> > @@ -523,7 +525,7 @@ static void submit_cleanup(struct
> > msm_gem_submit *submit, bool error)
> >         if (error)
> >                 submit_unpin_objects(submit);
> > 
> > -       if (submit->exec.objects)
> > +       if (submit->has_exec)
> >                 drm_exec_fini(&submit->exec);
> > 
> >         /* if job wasn't enqueued to scheduler, early retirement:
> > */
> > --
> > 2.53.0
> > 

  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-31 19:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-31  9:20 [PATCH 0/5] drm/exec: drm_exec polishing Thomas Hellström
2026-03-31  9:20 ` [PATCH 1/5] drm/exec: Remove the index parameter from drm_exec_for_each_locked_obj[_reverse] Thomas Hellström
2026-03-31  9:29   ` Christian König
2026-03-31  9:20 ` [PATCH 2/5] drm/msm: Remove abuse of drm_exec internals Thomas Hellström
2026-03-31  9:30   ` Christian König
2026-03-31  9:36   ` Christian König
2026-03-31 19:08   ` Rob Clark
2026-03-31 19:52     ` Thomas Hellström [this message]
2026-03-31 20:39       ` Rob Clark
2026-03-31  9:20 ` [PATCH 3/5] drm/exec: Make the drm_exec_until_all_locked() macro more readable Thomas Hellström
2026-03-31  9:39   ` Christian König
2026-03-31 11:03     ` Thomas Hellström
2026-03-31  9:20 ` [PATCH 4/5] drm/exec, drm/xe: Avoid abusing the drm_exec retry pointer Thomas Hellström
2026-03-31  9:44   ` Christian König
2026-03-31 10:13     ` Thomas Hellström
2026-03-31 11:09       ` Thomas Hellström
2026-03-31 11:59       ` Christian König
2026-03-31  9:20 ` [PATCH 5/5] drm/exec, drm/xe, drm/amdgpu: Add an accessor for struct drm_exec::ticket Thomas Hellström
2026-03-31  9:46   ` Christian König
2026-03-31 10:18     ` Thomas Hellström
2026-03-31 21:46   ` kernel test robot
2026-03-31 22:07   ` kernel test robot
2026-04-01  0:38   ` kernel test robot
2026-03-31  9:49 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/exec: drm_exec polishing Patchwork
2026-03-31  9:51 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bd45632be1a5bcd2ce34834b45a35254e23f7679.camel@linux.intel.com \
    --to=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=Felix.Kuehling@amd.com \
    --cc=abhinav.kumar@linux.dev \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
    --cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
    --cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=dakr@kernel.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jesszhan0024@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lumag@kernel.org \
    --cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=marijn.suijten@somainline.org \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=mripard@kernel.org \
    --cc=rob.clark@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=sean@poorly.run \
    --cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox